Wrong again - it's a genetically abnormal man (XY).
Why didn't "she" appeal in the CAS, smart guy?
Here's IBA's statement - they tested the guy and found he was indeed male. He could have appealed the ruling but did not:
No, there are genetic mutation leading to abnormalities in males and females.
Has anyone confirmed it's a case of Swyer syndrome?
It 100% is demonic possession and that's what every sane psychiatrist would also tell you. The "hormone disbalance in the brain" theory bs went down the drain recently.
Remember who was behind the 60's drug push into the mainstream. It was Tavistock and the CIA - nothing to do with freedom or "counterculture".
"Listen, my grandfather told me some fat jewish lie because he lacked discernment and wisdom to see through it and I'm going to live by it without ever questioning it for that same reason. Do you mean to tell me grampa was ever wrong and zionism is unchristian?"
That's not likely. The Y chromosome leads to expression of primary and secondary male characteristics including a penis, which could be underdeveloped (they usually cut it off in infancy, leaving the person to lead a life as a perceived female, or maybe an eunuch in the past?). Intersex people aka hermaphrodites are always male biologically (they could have additional X or even 2 or 3 X chromosomes). How they were perceived in culture is subjective but genetically speaking they are always male.
It can't be a biological woman and have Y chromosome, because only males have an Y chromosome - it's how gender is determined. It's a guy with some genetic syndrome. If the debates online showed anything, it's that people failed biology hard.
It was like that ever since the fake and gay freemason (jewish) revolution that toppled the monarchies and installed the left/right republican dialectic where in fact both the left and the right are equally revolutionary - the left being outright commies (the jacobins who won in France) and the right being moderate lolbert degenerates like most of the founding fathers (Jefferson was a famous mason and a satanist and Thomas Payne lived in a menage a trois). And now we see the fruits of their failed experiment (it was bound to fail from the beginning because they defied God and opted out of a monarchy or at least a Christian republic).
In the end both factions share the same basic presuppositions and the left is just more straightforward about it. If you want proof here it goes: today's "conservatives" would be considered liberals 60 years ago. They move along with the Overton window and they ain't conserving shit.
Look up an Orthodox Church near you and you will.
Yeah we used to even have the girls play football with us, nothing wrong with kids playing. I share a similar sentiment towards professional sport though. I think people who want to should practice it (I know pro weight lifters who are great people) but turning it into such a big part of our culture is obviously wrong.
What's worse than being a pro athlete is being a sports fan whose life revolves around those athletes. I believe the same about any form of bread and circuses that distract people from what's truly important. Just to think how many men treat sportsball as religion and how much money, energy and effort goes into the whole thing is disgusting. Like many other aspects of our culture, it's a sign of degradation and decay.
Don't you people have a Bible at hand or at least basic google skills?
Then He said to them, “But now, he who has a money bag, let him take it, and likewise a knapsack; and he who has no sword, let him sell his garment and buy one. For I say to you that this which is written must still be accomplished in Me: ‘And He was numbered with the transgressors.’ For the things concerning Me have an end.” So they said, “Lord, look, here are two swords.” And He said to them, “It is enough.”
— Gospel of Luke 22:36-38, NKJV
Dude, Christians literally fought crusades, what are you on about... We have warrior Saints too.
Stop acting like men can be women and stop letting them compete with each other.
Who would have thought soda can get any more poisonous?
They'll use the Olympics as an excuse to kickstart plandemic 2.0
Terrible but what'd you expect from clown world? We'll need this to become more commonplace before people start doing something.
He didn’t go around assaulting people for blasphemy or heresy
That's literally what He did. I can't believe you went to that passage that proves the opposite.
14 And He found in the temple those who sold oxen and sheep and doves, and the money changers [a]doing business. 15 When He had made a whip of cords, He drove them all out of the temple, with the sheep and the oxen, and poured out the changers’ money and overturned the tables. 16 And He said to those who sold doves, “Take these things away! Do not make My Father’s house a house of merchandise!”
John 2:14-16
Remember, this is the same God that said:
“He who strikes a man so that he dies shall surely be put to death.”
The "hippy-Jesus" you talk about is 2 dimensional and nonexistent. Our Lord is both loving, merciful and just and justice sometimes necessitates violence. This ties to my other comment about disciplining children - a father should be an icon of God in the family. I'll leave the conclusions to you. This is the true Christian morality and I showcased that aspect quoting our most cherished Church father St. John Chrysostom who gave us the Orthodox liturgical service.
Physical violence is a sure fire sign that the parent never learned to control their own emotions and doesn’t understand how to actually correct a behavior.
What if an occasional slap is more effective in correcting behavior and ends up being for the better of the child? You assume the reason parents hit their children is because they loose control and act on their emotions instead of reason. But what if they are guided by reason in administering the punishment?
Morrisey is based. Pretty solid song too.
God bless! I'm Orthodox but I can't find anything to disagree on here. We have common ground while most prots have no idea what Christianity is even about. That's why they embrace all this liberal anti-christian nonsense. Just look at how many "Christians" found nothing wrong in the opening ceremony. Zero discernment.
You have pure communism in your family. You don't trade duties in family, you do not charge your kids for food and do not pay your wife for washing dishes and you will feed every family member regardless of the size of their contribution to family wealth. This way things was long before any Jews appeared on the face of the Earth. Literally "From each according to ability, to each according to needs".
Correct, a family exhibits the above. But the family has a specific meaning tied to specific ends. It's a man and a woman united in a sacred marriage for the purpose of multiplying and attaining eternal salvation in God's Kingdom. How do you extrapolate that relationships within that unit to broader society? In the Christian paradigm, you can't because society (people) has another set of relationships codified in it - it's a yet another circle around the family. There you have your neighbor, community and people you exchange goods, services and trade with. There is equality too - but it's equality before God to whom every person and t heir soul is equally important and precious.
What communism does, is basically obliterating any distinctions and boundaries - not just between family and community, but up to the single individual who is now fully integrated and ceases to be a unique person made in the image of God. It's a demonic monist worldview, characteristic of the Eastern religions, platonism and Kabbalah ("We're all one and distinctions are an illusion" - aka Maya and the subsequent liberation from it through nirvana, or "We were once all one but fell into multiplicity, and now we must return back to unity" - a symbol of this is Eliphas Levi's Baphomet - the demon signifying the single origin of male and female and of all dichotomies, masons (jews) love that shit).
This is the occult metaphysics behind communism and it was well understood within the highest ranks of the Party - those guys weren't your usual diamat goobers because materialism is the dumbest philosophy ever created. They were decent philosophers who understood metaphysics more in the vain of O'Brian in 1984. They knew communism is a giant satanic cult and the ultimate form of government meant for the coming Antichrist.
That's why I said it's the greatest jewish lie. The reason you fell for it is because from what I gather you're not against Christianity, but you're also not grounded in the orthodox worldview and can't discern the subtle inversion of Christianity communism presents. There are 3 major red flags:
- they want to create a world without God, where secular government is the ultimate authority on everything (totalitarian humanist dictatorship)
- they want to establish a worldly paradise (utopia)
- they want to collapse all meaningful distinctions and hierarchies into One (monism, communism)
Jews always exaggerate things they want to use for their own goals. But you don't have to accept their exaggregation. You could easily love communism inside your family and hate it for the whole country. But Jews want you either hate it or love it unconditionally.
But why would I use their term "communism" to describe what a Christian family should be when I have a worldview that supplies all the terms and meanings I need? This is like using "cisgender" to describe a healthy sexual proclivity.
This is in fact a common jewish strategy. Jews know that if you just slip a new word and offer an identical meaning they can be like "but it's still the same thing, a synonym - not a biggie, you see?" But that's the first step in subversion of language and meaning. Then they gradually skew the context and add more meaning to the initial term, until it becomes a completely new concept and meanwhile they use culture and media to saturate the language with the new term. This was also explained brilliantly in 1984 and I think this was the most important part of the book. The way people think is governed by the words (concepts) they know and use.
It's the claims made by the federation that disqualified those guys on the grounds of not meeting gender criteria. Claims which the boxers didn't appeal for some reason. They could have easily taken another test proving their sex.