That's a fair point.
Could be all carefully engineered PR for all we know. Or maybe he started off organic and was propped up in the process. I'm 100% there are several NGOs behind his political degenerate shilling and NWO corporate bootlicking. Lefty millennials and zoomers love this cucked soyman.
Yeah, but we also have a TON of shit documenting WW2 as it actually happened. This is known as "contemporary" evidence.
Another magic dividing line in history again?
Are you serious? Those two contradict each other. You acknowledge there's difference in technology, media and society now and 2000 years ago and in the next sentence you deny it?
You are right. If every country behaved as Palestinians do, much of the world would be in ruins as gaza is now.
It's the jews who are slaughtering civilians as we speak. They've been doing this for decades. Have some humility and sympathy, you being atheist doesn't mean you don't have a soul or a conscience. You're made in God's image.
Like, they still make vaccines the same way they always did. In chicken eggs. I'd be willing to be that the only real protection from vaccines is from immunogloobulins in eggs.
Protection from what though. No virus has been isolated and proven to exist.
That's correct, but Peterson and Destiny are not just your regular fresh outta college normies. They have huge influence and are public figures, not some anonymoys journo halfwits (it's likely Destiny is not as stupid as he pretends to be).
One small distinction: Jews want to be perceived as the good guys, as a civilized democratic pro-western nation and as perpetual victims.
That's what degeneracy does to the brain.
I agree but we're talking about ethnic jews only, not about their henchmen. Otherwise we'd have to put almost everyone including Trump or Bill Gates in that category too.
Why not use Musk supportive visit into Israel during palestinian genocide as an argument? For me it is more than enough to get who Musk is and on which side. Why try to stretch some questionable arguments?
Because this post is not about discrediting Musk and exposing his allegiance to the ethnostate. It's about exactly what is stated in the video.
You know to be honest I've not really bothered to spend any time looking into the evidence that plato existed. Then again, nobody ever told me that I need to close my eyes and telepathically send love-letters to Plato.
Now now, you're strawmaning again. We're tackling your denial of Jesus as a historical figure, not as God or as the messiah.
Do you have anything mentioning Jesus that predates 94 AD or not? Because 60 fuckin years is a long time.
It's not. It's within the lifespan of one generation. It's like saying you can't have knowledge of things that happened in the 60's by talking to your parents or grandparents about it. To put it in perspective, people still have stories about WWII.
If all these stories suddenly started emerging today about some magical dude in 1964 who was totally a real person, I'm sure we'd all be quite skeptical about it.
Lol, that's the worst bad faith argument I've heard. That would be the case IF we pretended the world in 1964 was the same world as 33AD and if that hypothetical applied for everything else we know about the 60's (stories about other popular people of the 60's popping out of nowhere). We don't know whether there weren't more documents available to Tacitus and the others that were lost. This is highly likely but regardless they had knowledge and certainty of the events they were writing on.
Are you sure on those numbers? But I get your point - jews are largely overrepresented in the political realm to begin with. That's also mentioned in the video.
I'm an atheist. I don't believe your god even exists and I'm 50/50 on whether or Jesus even lived as a man.
Are you that skeptical of other historical figures of that time or is it something particular that irks you about Christ and the possibility He was indeed who He was as described in the Bible? By attestation I mean other non-Christian documents too. Here's a jewpedia article about it: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sources_for_the_historicity_of_Jesus
Not a single person that we know of wrote about Jesus while Jesus was still alive. Which is very odd for someone that traveled around performing public miracles.
Not a single person wrote about Plato while he was alive too. The first attestation we get for him come 500 years after he died. People back then didn't write everything down immediately and even if they did, much of what they did write down was lost through the ages.
Because according to my research, that's the earliest mention you're gonna find.
So it doesn't count if it was sourced a few decades after the events? What is your claim? That Tacitus and other non-Christian Roman historians made the whole thing up? If that's your standard just concede you can't know anything about ancient and early medieval history at all.
And if they didn't kill him, you wouldn't even call him your messiah in the first place.
Stupid argument. Same as "If it weren't for Judas, Jesus wouldn't have been resurrected". So Judas good?
Not that there's any historical evidence that he actually existed in the first place, unlike the kingdom of Israel which is absolutely historically verified.
Now you're embarrassing yourself. All your credibility in the history domain went down the drain. The NT is the most well attested document of ancient history (https://imgb.ifunny.co/images/1277bee99a10369b2126199c57a50457c80d821bd008e0a7c41e4d7f660c1c75_1.webp).
Based on early documents alone, we have more certainty Christ existed than say Plato. And yet it's always Christ existence that's put into question by "skeptics" but never other popular figures of that time. Strange - it's as if some people have vested interest in denying the Truth and hate Him more than everything. You're a jew, aren't you? Is this why you can't help lying all the time?
Jews killed their messiah. They hate Jesus and use His name as a cuss word. They have their tentacles around the global economy and are the main cause behind most of the crises we're facing through their fake money printing and media propaganda. They are the epitome of evil and servants of Satan. No true Christian can feel any commonality with a jew (and they hold that to be true also since we're goyim to them).
I'm not siding with Palestinians because I think they're great and not barbaric antichrists, rapists and goat fuckers. I'm very much against the mass immigration from the islamic world. No, I'm siding with them because they are on the right side in this conflict. I come from a country that was enslaved by the Ottomans for 5 centuries - do you think I have a deep seated love for muslims?
And you know that how?
Much of history is fake and gay but this is just stupid. Even if he were muslim, the colonizers of America were very much catholic and protestant europeans.
One CIA asset arguing with another CIA asset over something anyone with half a brain already knows. What they actually do is framing the argument about vaccines in general - they are willing to sacrifice trust in mRNA for the sake of regular vaccines. As long as people keep injecting themselves with toxic substances against non-existing viruses they are happy.
Have you noticed how prevalent the "I'm not anti-vaxx, I don't trust the covid shot in particular because it's different" sentiment has become? I went on that bandwagon for a while too. That's social engineers going into damage mode and doing their job.
They won't. They need our kids because they can't breed. Transhumanists are parasites.
I think it is also good thing to find out - why they need us all and not satisfied with just majority.
Because it's a totalitarian system. Competing ideas and worldviews can't be tolerated because it posits danger to the stability of the system. It could spread like a virus. All oppositions has to be controlled and they can either send the dissenters to prison and camps (1984) or they can give them land outside of the technocratic megapolis (Brave New World).
Many at the time of USSR fall bought to Western narratives, but eventually found out that it was all same crap as many soviet narratives. Looks like she fell to Western narratives at USSR fall and unlike most here then moved to GB where Western narratives supported constantly, so she missed that part when Western narrative fall into pieces here and become too uncurious about things around.
I know exactly what you're talking about because I live in it. My country is in the EU and there's a lot of pro-western propaganda that manages to convince young educated people how great the west is. They are using the anti-communist, democratic right sentiment to push people away from Russia and towards the west as if the west is in any way right or democratic. There is a demographic of young educated people in the big cities that eat that up and while the majority of the population is rather conservative and opposed to "european values" we still are ruled by a pro-EU party installed by the western elite. We even got a mini color revolution back in 2020 that installed the current regime (although the previous prime-minister is still in power and he always expressed pro NATO and EU sentiments).
The propagandized demographic exhibits absolute support of all the narratives - be it the coof, clotshots, ukraine, lgbt, atheism, degeneracy, climate change, censorship. That's the power of educational indoctrination, media and culture. All the information is there, it's obvious how stupid the narratives are and yet those supposedly smart people are completely brainwashed. 5th generation warfare is what it is, people just get hijacked.
I almost believed that jewpedia article.
Fuck you and your synagogue of Satan apologetics. Palestinian women and children are getting slaughtered by those animals, because jews consider them goyim and not human beings. I am Christian and consider muslims deluded and anti-christian, but I would never support a genocide against them.
We all know why they're instigating this war - so they can take over the whole land, demolish the mosque and rebuild their satanic temple. They're breeding red heifers for the purpose and have the plans for the altar ready. You are supporting a genocide, get the fuck out of here, I'm done with you.
Bush was just following order. We all know (((who))) did it.
Really I don't see propaganda as something inherently bad. It is just a tool that could be useful or harmful depending on who and with what purpose use it. What could be bad in propaganda of family values, knowledge or healthy way of life, for example?
Absolutely agree. Propaganda is about propagating ideas and values - it has no moral quality on its own, it's just a tool like any technology. I don't see authoritarian government as bad either. That's what monarchy is after all.
Validity of state laws depends on their distance from moral laws. Further state laws from moral laws, less they would be respected. To implement those insane laws globalists want, they have to change moral laws in the first place. And according to all above they need faith in system to change moral laws. And again, faith in system is a key thing in all that psyop.
So we get to the argument about moral laws - what they are, how are they justified, are they constructs and subjective or universal and objective. You see how by gradually implementing ideas like atheism, scientism, liberalism, materialism, cultural relativism, etc into society, people's worldview and value system is being changed. Today, there isn't a unified value system for all people, although great efforts are made to erect such a system and most normies in the West will adhere to it - the globohomo soyence consoomer transhumanistic hedonistic degenerate nihilistic one. It's obvious those people's views on what's good, valuable or what freedom is will be vastly different opposite of mine or yours. Yet those are the ideas that get to create law and policy and set us up for the NWO.
That's one of misteries I can't resolve, really. Why and how people forget recent events so fast. Yes, that narrative of living in current day and all that stuff is powerful, but shock from previous manipulation should be strong enough to be significant to remember.
I'd say it's psychological control. A sort of MK Ultra trance people are put into through the constant stream of information and stimuli. That's the dumbing down effect of msm and pop culture. Add to that the purely physiological aspect of bio-warfare through toxic environment, food, water and drugs and people don't even have the capability or the energy and willingness to follow what's going on. So we get back at that B. Russel quote.
But today she suddenly assume that all that GB crap was right thing and helped to "stop covid".
She got hijacked by the propaganda. Living in the West makes you a part of the experiment. It's a giant Skinner box of sorts. People get indoctrinated and their worldview is changed without realizing it.
That paradoxes show that all that modern alt-anti-globalist-movement miss something important and focuses on wrong things in their activity. Well, they do a good job of speading some info, but somehow don't try to dig deeper. And even if they do, it results in some "saturn worshipping" crap and other weird things that looks more like distraction or well poisoning than attempt to find out something practically useful.
Very much agree. Many of those are controlled opposition psy ops. They poison the well by divulging truth mixed with lies and corralling people in groups that are easy to manage and target.
You idiot, arabs WERE NOT muslim before Islam was created in 7th century. Cut the Quran bs and stop strawmaning everything I say. Regardless of whether you believe arabs have their origin from Abraham's son Ishmael, both arabs and jews belong to the semitic group of peoples and both use semitic languages common to the region.
It would only apply to direct family members of Mohammed, who are extinct.
Possibly, I don't claim they're the same. You're the one making claims about jewish ancestry. I'd like to see your proof that modern khazarian jews are descendent from the jews 2000 years ago.
I mean, 90% there took the shot so I wouldn't be surprised if they fall for it again. Those people are braindead.
You're a sophist. Multiple non-Christian historians wrote about Him and their account confirms the account of the evangelists (not including supernatural claims).
As I said - if you don't accept the historic attestation of Jesus as a historical figure because it was written 60 years after His death, you should reevaluate almost everything you assume to know about the distant past. And yet here you are arguing about the jews having historical claim on the land as if the account supporting that is not problematic.