And if they didn't kill him, you wouldn't even call him your messiah in the first place.
Stupid argument. Same as "If it weren't for Judas, Jesus wouldn't have been resurrected". So Judas good?
Not that there's any historical evidence that he actually existed in the first place, unlike the kingdom of Israel which is absolutely historically verified.
Based on early documents alone, we have more certainty Christ existed than say Plato. And yet it's always Christ existence that's put into question by "skeptics" but never other popular figures of that time. Strange - it's as if some people have vested interest in denying the Truth and hate Him more than everything. You're a jew, aren't you? Is this why you can't help lying all the time?
Stupid argument. Same as "If it weren't for Judas, Jesus wouldn't have been resurrected". So Judas good?
Now you're embarrassing yourself. All your credibility in the history domain went down the drain. The NT is the most well attested document of ancient history (https://imgb.ifunny.co/images/1277bee99a10369b2126199c57a50457c80d821bd008e0a7c41e4d7f660c1c75_1.webp).
Based on early documents alone, we have more certainty Christ existed than say Plato. And yet it's always Christ existence that's put into question by "skeptics" but never other popular figures of that time. Strange - it's as if some people have vested interest in denying the Truth and hate Him more than everything. You're a jew, aren't you? Is this why you can't help lying all the time?