If that were the case why the many references to the OT? What does "Before Abraham Was, I Am" refer to if not "I Am that I Am"? Or What does John 1 mean:
1 In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. 2 He was in the beginning with God. 3 All things were made through Him, and without Him nothing was made that was made. 4 In Him was life, and the life was the light of men. 5 And the light shines in the darkness, and the darkness did not [a]comprehend it.
10 He was in the world, and the world was made through Him, and the world did not know Him. 11 He came to His [c]own, and His [d]own did not receive Him. 12 But as many as received Him, to them He gave the [e]right to become children of God, to those who believe in His name: 13 who were born, not of blood, nor of the will of the flesh, nor of the will of man, but of God.
14 And the Word became flesh and dwelt among us, and we beheld His glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father, full of grace and truth.
15 John bore witness of Him and cried out, saying, “This was He of whom I said, ‘He who comes after me [f]is preferred before me, for He was before me.’ ”
16 [g]And of His fullness we have all received, and grace for grace. 17 For the law was given through Moses, but grace and truth came through Jesus Christ. 18 No one has seen God at any time. The only begotten [h]Son, who is in the bosom of the Father, He has declared Him.
It was the Word (Christ) through Whom everything was created and He was with God (the Father). It is Christ Who appears and speaks to the prophets of the OT (the theophanies), not the Father or the Holy Spirit. Only the Son reveals Himself to people ("I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me.")
Marcionism is a low effort heresy early Christians committed because they lacked proper knowledge of Scripture and the doctrines and were influenced by pagan religions like Zoroastrianism (the benevolent god vs. demiurge creator evil god). This gnostic bs has been refuted by Tertullian and later condemned by the Church at the Ecumenical councils.
Jews rejected Christ. They reject Christianity period, there's no need for Marcion's heresy to divorce the NT from the Old and deny the obvious succession to demonstrate they hate the true messiah.
Conclusion: Marcion is not a saint of any existing Christian denomination, he's a gnostic heretic so your title is false too.
You're either with Him or against Him. There's no third way. We all know where the (false) jews stand and Trump loves them because they're his masters. The Talmud literally calls Christ the son of a prostitute. Anyone standing with the state of Israel is a traitor and has the spirit of the antichrist and they will be judged accordingly.
This book is the most definitive mainstream historical research on the subject: https://dn790008.ca.archive.org/0/items/dunlop-d.-m.-the-history-of-the-jewish-khazars/Dunlop%20D.M.%20-%20The%20History%20of%20the%20Jewish%20Khazars.pdf
Here's what one guy wrote about it:
For all the folks who claim Arthur Koestler invented the Khazar theory this is proof he didnt. Koestler wrote his book so others could simply say "A zionist invented this theory". The truth is there are even more books out there than this one on the Khazars and you could check with the Vatican library or just google Leo the Khazar. The people who dont believe there were Khazars obviously do not want to know their history either, usually the same people who dont want to know the history of the House of Judah or the Israelites (all 12 tribes) that James the apostle for one addressed his epistle to. One has to ask why the Arabic looking Jews look different from the European type Jews and I am here to tell you it is not because of geography it is because of biology.
Dunlop does a fantastic job recreating the age old Pagan nomad Empire caught in the center of a religious struggle between Christiandom and the Islamic expanisionist Caliphate. A debate was held between by the Khazar Khagan between a Christian Bishop sent from Byzantium, his Jewish advisor and an Islamic Imam resulting in a third power, a Jewish one. Dunlop presents a well documented work which takes into consideration all documentation Christian, Jewish and Islamic Historical resources in his review. Dunlop uses scholorly advisors to assertain which information is more of fact and which is fabrication for political purposes. It is a very interesting read which dispells much of the myths of Eastern European Jewish history as well is the most accurate presentation on this specific topic. Arthur Kostler in his lesser work "The Thirteenth Tribe" uses Dunlops work in mass referance although it falls short when compared to "The History of the Jewish Khazars" by taking a leap and realying on information deemed inaccurate according to Dunlop and his advisors. Other then that a recommeded read far superior and more indepth then that of Kostler's effort.
I'll read it and make a thread eventually.
Good. I made my motivation perfectly clear - I don't want controlled centralized CBDC.
Good. I made my motivation perfectly clear - I don't want controlled centralized CBDC.
“According to independent estimates, over 6.5 million lives were saved in the first year of use alone and over 3bn doses were supplied globally,” the statement said.
Just throw in some big numbers there and say they're independent estimates. Such scientific rigor!
Only in America, the land of megachurches, charismatics and messianic jews, can someone come up with the insane idea that Donald J. Trump is a Christian.
The khazarian origin of ashkenazi jews theory came from the 19th century. Koestler may have found it useful for the purpose you mention but that doesn't invalidate the theory.
It's a historical fact the Khazar khaganate (modern day Ukraine) converted to judaism around 8th c. starting with Khan Bulan: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bulan_(Khazar) and were a jewish state until the russians came and destroyed them (history rhymes apparently).
We'll need a separate thread for that indeed.
Consider it a borrowing then. I could have used orange man instead. I also use Brandon or pedo Peter when I talk about the other guy. It's a way to disrespect them both because they deserve it. Language is funny this way.
15 “Beware of false prophets, who come to you in sheep’s clothing, but inwardly they are ravenous wolves. 16 You will know them by their fruits. Do men gather grapes from thornbushes or figs from thistles? 17 Even so, every good tree bears good fruit, but a bad tree bears bad fruit. 18 A good tree cannot bear bad fruit, nor can a bad tree bear good fruit. 19 Every tree that does not bear good fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire. 20 Therefore by their fruits you will know them.
Matthew 7:15-20
Well, at least we see their fruits now.
Thanks, I'll read more on that.
The modern day Jews are not, and have never been, God's Israel people as proven by the bible, history and even Jewish writings.
Apparently DNA tests also prove that. They've had already lost the historical lineage even at the time the gospels were written. Today's jews in the west and Israel are mostly turkic people from the Khazarian khaganate (modern Ukraine). Makes one wonder if there's a deeper significance in the wars waged in both former jewish historic kingdoms.
What makes you think so?
So you can tell that I'm cucked because I used Drumpf instead of Trump?
The Roman Empire became Christian eventually and lasted in the East as Byzantium until the Renaissance. The Byzantine empire was an organic society for the better part of its existence. It's system of government was called a symphony - rule by both the Church and the state where both complement each other, symbolized by the double-headed eagle (compare that with the single headed eagle which denotes totalitarian centralization of power). The mind control psy ops and deceptions began after that due to mercantilization and banking which the jews gladly took up. Usury was criminalized in Christian states before that because it's considered sinful.
That's seems right. But the misled once are all going to side with the Antichrist and will eventually accept the beast system just like they did the vaxx passports and the clotshots. They will be among the goats when judgment comes. Being ignorant or misled is not an excuse.
That's an ad hom. No argument there.
Why would monarchs, who's reign was dependent on the people genocide and starve them to death willingly? Yes, there were famines due to crop failures and poor planning. Genocide could only happen due to rebellion or due to failing to defend your people from outside threats. In those times you needed a lot of manpower to grow food and to wage wars. Hierarchy in society was a given and people knew their place. Sure there were unfit, cruel or weak monarchs but they weren't tolerated by their competitors and by the people. As a whole, people loved their rulers and there was no need for them to be brainwashed to do so if the ruler was good and just.
You're looking at history through a liberal egalitarian and frankly marxist worldview where there is always a struggle between the oppressor and the oppressed class. The have and the have nots. That's a relatively recent notion and definitely was not how people in the Medieval time thought. Everyone had their duties and responsibilities in society according to their lot. The king had a duty to rule for the good of the people and people had a duty to obey their king. Just like your head commands your whole body - should the body revolt and disobey it because the other parts feel as important as the head? That's the same thought process that brought us all forms of egalitarianism including feminism too. Women were told they no longer had to listen to and obey men because they are now equal and can be their own masters. Now they assumed the oppressed class status. Next it was the blacks. Then the gays, etc. They've opened the pandora box. Now everyone thinks they're entitled to rights but reject their duties. Everyone talks about liberty as the ultimate good and yet they are more slavish than ever.
That's not good enough. He still is culpable and needs to face justice.
Sadly, Christianity in the West has been compromised for more than a thousand years. The Illuminati took much of their strategy, methods and structure from the Jesuits.
I'm not sure what you mean by "caused the Medieval Dark Ages". You speak of it as if it was some kind of an event or a single regime, yet the Medieval period spanned 1000 years and it's impossible to be summarized like that (besides calling it "dark" and "the old world order" as opposed to "enlightened" and "novus ordo seclorum" in freemason/illuminati fashion which is exactly what the 18c. revolutionaries did and what people are born into presupposing the good guys won a few hundred years ago against the oppressive monarchy and Church bringing us the enlightened egalitarian, feminized and degenerate society we live in today, a society that can't even reproduce and that ironically while seemingly chaotic is more oppressed and top-down controlled than ever by tptb).
With the clotshots? He shouldn't have initiated the military operation Warp Speed to begin with. But even after that he had the choice to halt the vaccine program and expose the shots as unsafe and ineffective. Sure, they may have killed him but he'd die as a martyr. Instead, he doubled down and patted himself on the back for killing and disabling thousands of people (millions worldwide).
I'm not even going into his support for Israel and zionism. This makes it all the more obvious he's controlled (RFK too - they may allow an "anti-vaxxer" in the public arena but they will never allow anyone who's not licking balls for Israel; also the fake libertarian controlled opposition Javier Milei - they all love the ethno-state).
Lol, its peasants like my ancestors, who helped create this country, with crazy ideas that they read, in books like the bible.
Take Rev John Wing for example, a unworthy minister who lived about 500 years ago.
He claimed that we had our own connections to god, we didnt need a pastor to tell us what god was thinking. Stuff like this is the basis of western democracy.
I know, and the degenerate dying culture we live in now, that touted western democracy, is the logical conclusion, the fruit of the theological and ecclesiological fallacies of the reformation. Was the Catholic Church corrupt? Sure it was and it still is. But that doesn't mean the protestants were correct in uprooting Christianity from its tradition and reinterpreting everything as they pleased, creating as many interpretations as there are people reading the text. Christianity is all about tradition and succession. That's why we get the full linage of Jesus in the gospels, or the many references to the OT, the rituals which are taken from OT and transformed by Christ, the liturgy or the "laying of hands" as a way to pass on the Holy Spirit. Take all that away and you get a guy (if you're lucky) in a suit preaching their personal interpretation of Scripture in an office building. That's a self-help session, not a liturgy and it has nothing to do with the early Christian Church.
If it werent for "peasants" like my ancestors, wed still be relying on priests and kings/queens to interpret gods will for us lmao.
Why is that bad? Do we fare better now having 1000+ fake churches and various new age demonic interpretations of Scripture? There is only one truth in Christ. In fact Christians still rely on the Church for interpretation because that's the only true interpretation there is - through tradition, apostolic succession and the Church. The Bible (both testaments) was written by the Church Fathers inspired by the Holy Spirit, it's a product of that tradition.
It's easier to cheer for him when presented with a false choice between him and some legacy CIA/CFR/Skull and Bones selected ghoul.
Warp speed level cope. Was that what Q said? Do I have to link the many times Trump explicitly endorsed the mRNA/DNA covid vaccines?