Why would monarchs, who's reign was dependent on the people genocide and starve them to death willingly? Yes, there were famines due to crop failures and poor planning. Genocide could only happen due to rebellion or due to failing to defend your people from outside threats. In those times you needed a lot of manpower to grow food and to wage wars. Hierarchy in society was a given and people knew their place. Sure there were unfit, cruel or weak monarchs but they weren't tolerated by their competitors and by the people. As a whole, people loved their rulers and there was no need for them to be brainwashed to do so if the ruler was good and just.
You're looking at history through a liberal egalitarian and frankly marxist worldview where there is always a struggle between the oppressor and the oppressed class. The have and the have nots. That's a relatively recent notion and definitely was not how people in the Medieval time thought. Everyone had their duties and responsibilities in society according to their lot. The king had a duty to rule for the good of the people and people had a duty to obey their king. Just like your head commands your whole body - should the body revolt and disobey it because the other parts feel as important as the head? That's the same thought process that brought us all forms of egalitarianism including feminism too. Women were told they no longer had to listen to and obey men because they are now equal and can be their own masters. Now they assumed the oppressed class status. Next it was the blacks. Then the gays, etc. They've opened the pandora box. Now everyone thinks they're entitled to rights but reject their duties. Everyone talks about liberty as the ultimate good and yet they are more slavish than ever.
Why would monarchs, who's reign was dependent on the people genocide and starve them to death willingly? Yes, there were famines due to crop failures and poor planning. Genocide could only happen due to rebellion or due to failing to defend your people from outside threats. In those times you needed a lot of manpower to grow food and to wage wars. Hierarchy in society was a given and people knew their place. Sure there were unfit, cruel or weak monarchs but they weren't tolerated by their competitors and by the people. As a whole, people loved their rulers and there was no need for them to be brainwashed to do so if the ruler was good and just.
This is when you have an organic society. European "history" past the Roman Empire is on a straight and slippery slope to controlled mass-demoliton by insidious forces (most people like to call them the "Jews" but Gentiles such as the Chinese and the Cambodians can join) and it gets spread to just about everywhere else after the 19th century.
The Roman Empire became Christian eventually and lasted in the East as Byzantium until the Renaissance. The Byzantine empire was an organic society for the better part of its existence. It's system of government was called a symphony - rule by both the Church and the state where both complement each other, symbolized by the double-headed eagle (compare that with the single headed eagle which denotes totalitarian centralization of power). The mind control psy ops and deceptions began after that due to mercantilization and banking which the jews gladly took up. Usury was criminalized in Christian states before that because it's considered sinful.
Why would monarchs, who's reign was dependent on the people genocide and starve them to death willingly? Yes, there were famines due to crop failures and poor planning. Genocide could only happen due to rebellion or due to failing to defend your people from outside threats. In those times you needed a lot of manpower to grow food and to wage wars. Hierarchy in society was a given and people knew their place. Sure there were unfit, cruel or weak monarchs but they weren't tolerated by their competitors and by the people. As a whole, people loved their rulers and there was no need for them to be brainwashed to do so if the ruler was good and just.
You're looking at history through a liberal egalitarian and frankly marxist worldview where there is always a struggle between the oppressor and the oppressed class. The have and the have nots. That's a relatively recent notion and definitely was not how people in the Medieval time thought. Everyone had their duties and responsibilities in society according to their lot. The king had a duty to rule for the good of the people and people had a duty to obey their king. Just like your head commands your whole body - should the body revolt and disobey it because the other parts feel as important as the head? That's the same thought process that brought us all forms of egalitarianism including feminism too. Women were told they no longer had to listen to and obey men because they are now equal and can be their own masters. Now they assumed the oppressed class status. Next it was the blacks. Then the gays, etc. They've opened the pandora box. Now everyone thinks they're entitled to rights but reject their duties. Everyone talks about liberty as the ultimate good and yet they are more slavish than ever.
This is when you have an organic society. European "history" past the Roman Empire is on a straight and slippery slope to controlled mass-demoliton by insidious forces (most people like to call them the "Jews" but Gentiles such as the Chinese and the Cambodians can join) and it gets spread to just about everywhere else after the 19th century.
The Roman Empire became Christian eventually and lasted in the East as Byzantium until the Renaissance. The Byzantine empire was an organic society for the better part of its existence. It's system of government was called a symphony - rule by both the Church and the state where both complement each other, symbolized by the double-headed eagle (compare that with the single headed eagle which denotes totalitarian centralization of power). The mind control psy ops and deceptions began after that due to mercantilization and banking which the jews gladly took up. Usury was criminalized in Christian states before that because it's considered sinful.