by DrLeaks
2
Questionable 2 points ago +2 / -0

Humans are not phones. '

3
Questionable 3 points ago +3 / -0

And would you look at that, he actually named some names. I have no idea who those people are, but there they are.

by Asterix
1
Questionable 1 point ago +1 / -0

Page not available.

1
Questionable 1 point ago +1 / -0

no it's not you braindead chimp.

You're adherence to the teaching of Jesus are flawed. In fact you could say you are failing.

It is O.K to not know. That is not debatable.

1
Questionable 1 point ago +1 / -0

so what's the truth then? is it flat or round?

Crater Earth says it's both. But you would know that since you've already 'looked into it' and aren't just venomously attacking people as retards. Right? You already know the answer to your own Question correct?

https://www.bitchute.com/video/QetnEQ2pszMr/

1
Questionable 1 point ago +1 / -0

Working List of Problematic Posting Paterns:

Motivated Reasoning Bias

link

Narrative Templates

link

The Red Line of Reality

link

What should be happening in your head upon Reading these:

Red Light Triggered

2
Questionable 2 points ago +2 / -0

You've now created backstories, story lines, and motivations for a small group of people that worked on a movie in 1990, and entire police divisions, to support your statements of 'The internalized perceived passage of time being accelerated'. Which is a concept that has no attachment to any meaningful real world occurrence. This is fucking madness.

WARNING:

Motivated Reasoning Bias: Detected

link

Narrative Control Template: Detected

link

Red Line of Sanity: Breached

link

Red Light: Triggered

link

2
Questionable 2 points ago +2 / -0

Gosh golly sir. If I turn in a list of my fellow flat earthers to be banned from your site, will you reinstate me and allow me to up vote threads over there?

I now know it was wrong of me to post content here on this other website that you don't control. And that you were in the right when you spied on me, and banned me for my content here.

We are all beneath you, for not carrying your water.

Hint: It rhymes with "hair lyding in eye lacement!"

1
Questionable 1 point ago +1 / -0

To be clear. Don't actually do this. Just be aware that others are doing this. To you!

1
Questionable 1 point ago +1 / -0

I wasn't engaging with you, as I was working on the linked image.

Or more accurately, I am engaging with you, but not with the narrative.

In addition, the time of silence between responses, is also a form of engagement.

engage in debate

There is no such thing as debate online without a debate moderator.

There are only text based exchanges.

1
Questionable 1 point ago +1 / -0

Correct. I am not trying to own you. I am trying to educate you.

Now just click the fucking link.

you strong confidant noble young man.

1
Questionable 1 point ago +1 / -0

In addition, aim past your target, and allow for bullet drop. You will seem crazy, but the 'corrected' version from the masses will seem more realistic.

https://conspiracies.win/p/17rmJZ14SJ/x/c/4Z7QYDZ98Pw

1
Questionable 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yes. I'm insulting you. And now you are defensive. See how easy it is to be manipulate now?

Sorry, didn't read past first sentence as this was what I was waiting for.

And I am done working on my thread for your review:

https://conspiracies.win/p/17rmJZ30Ol/

Enjo̷̧͉͋y!

1
Questionable 1 point ago +1 / -0

Until World War 2, you were considered a child until you were 21. This is how the family unit was destroyed. Useful idiots like you, going along with the current zeitgeist.

Oh wait. Are you claiming he was a self made millionaire at age 19, and just new about Kabbalist teaching through osmosis?

Take a screen cap > Write a narrative > Make it the title > Fool simple people > lather, rinse & repeat, until the brain is squeaky clean and washed.

1
Questionable 1 point ago +1 / -0

In the story, where he refers to his past, as a 19 year old? So, a college age youth, where as now he is 80+ years old? Do you think at all, or just mask everything in your veil of un-reality? I don't know man, You're seeming awfully Questionable to me.

Now, are you speaking on roadkill77 behalf? Because I asked him a Question, and not you. And it's his place to defend his stance. Or in this case dodge it.

2
Questionable 2 points ago +2 / -0

Those are actually real guns, available at the time. They are just outfitting them with really bad laser site choices.

https://www.imfdb.org/wiki/Predator_2

Det. Danny Archuleta (Rubén Blades) at the top carries a Smith & Wesson 4506 fitted with a Laser Products model 302 weaponlight.

Detective Leona Cantrell (Maria Conchita Alonso) Cantrell with her SIG-Sauer P226. The early LASERAIM sight appears to have been designed for a longer pistol.

Only 3 guns in the entire movie have laser sites on them, that look inappropriate. As laser sites were very popular and trending at the time.

2
Questionable 2 points ago +2 / -0

So.

Judge a man not by the content of his character, but by those his Father hired to teach him as a child. -roadkill77

Would you claim that I am misrepresenting you here?

4
Questionable 4 points ago +4 / -0

They claim to be all about debate, but without a debate moderator there is no such thing. There is also no ability to down vote, so there isn't even a means to signal disapproval.

4
Questionable 4 points ago +4 / -0

You called someone over there a nigger didn't you?

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›