by pkvi
3
Questionable 3 points ago +3 / -0

K. Anyone tell him that Trump already had that slated for May?

1
Questionable 1 point ago +1 / -0

He's warning against the standard, cheap vaccines. The kind that has been used for decades now. Because he doesn't make as much money, unless you take the expensive mRNA therapy. The one Mike Yeadon, former Chief scientist of Pfizer says will KILL YOU WITHIN 2 YEARS TIME OF TAKING IT!

There is no reason to take the vaccine. HCQ is a reliable cure.

11
Questionable 11 points ago +11 / -0

Could be good old fashion money laundering. Probably taking massive 'losses' on their 'gardening businesses'.

2
Questionable 2 points ago +2 / -0

"Don't ignore the elephant in the room."

Oh, I think the room can only fit one elephant though.

Biochemistry debunks Corona Virus, a look at Terrain theory

I keep the rest of the elephants here.

2
Questionable 2 points ago +2 / -0

Bacteria are definitely real. Viruses, on the other hand are Questionable. Namely for every disease caused by a virus, there is a version of said disease that is not.

Non Viral AIDS, non viral hepatitis. They even claim that the human genome contains the herpes virus. Doesn't that mean it's just our DNA? The Ebola Virus? Nope. That's actually a strain of bacteria.

2
Questionable 2 points ago +2 / -0

If restaurants are opening, they are placing large orders for condiments. Really not that complicated.

by pkvi
1
Questionable 1 point ago +1 / -0

"because it does nothing but humiliate your current username. You’ll switch to a new one next week and pretend it never happened."

w҉̀͜h͡a̕t ҉̨į̢͞s̴ ͘͡it ỳ̡̛o͢͞͝u̷̕ t͏͟rul̸͞͡y̡͠ kn͠ò̵̕w̢.‽ Nothing T̴̜̼̀̃͊̑̊̇̍̈́͋H̶̢̼̳̫͇̥͌̿̌̿͆̚͝À̷̳̺̯̻̘̯̀̀̓̍̈̉͂̌̃͑̓́T̵̬̺̥̉͐̀̀̂͘'̴̧̧̛͚͍͍̗̟̝̤̯͈͒͗̍̉̂̍̎͝S̸̡͈̻̫̄͜ ̵̛̝͈͎͓͎͖͔̞͈̥͖̯̎̀͑͆͘͜͝͝ͅW̸̡̞̪͔͙͙̭̱͇̣̘̑̽̂̿͗̆͐͂͂̄͌̑̚H̴͓̹̺̔̑͂̍̏̉̓͑̂̒́̕̚A̴̢̝̙͎̩̯̞̫̼͋̋͑̍̋̿͘̕T̶̛̙̝̻͋̌̃̏

₪₪₪ ₪₪₪₪ ₪₪₪₪₪

5
Questionable 5 points ago +5 / -0

Biochemistry debunk Corona Virus, a look at Terrain theory

https://www.bitchute.com/video/B1OuvLzH6P5i/

Germ theory is such a predominate component of our economy that no one dares speak against it.

Presidents have been assassinated for far less.

2
Questionable 2 points ago +2 / -0

""She has joint-bank-account information, credit cards, tax records, tax returns — that's the meat of what we're looking at to see what types of patterns we might be able to find," her lawyer told Business Insider on Tuesday."

So they don't even know what they are looking for? Now they are hoping for patterns. They should go to hobby lobby. I hear they have many patterns for sale. I believe they will sell them a clown costume pattern on the cheap.

Well, I couldn't find one. So here is a cute baby dressed as a clown fish!

by pkvi
2
Questionable 2 points ago +2 / -0

I will leave you with this. The endorphin feedback loop of replying to social media is destructive to your mind. You need to become more objective, or else you will become the rat in the maze you rail against.

by pkvi
3
Questionable 3 points ago +3 / -0

" all you can do is parrot talking points given to you by controlled opposition media."

I have brought up zero talking points. I am trying to express my concern for your mental health, and inability to communicate your thoughts to others.

In case you are interested. Here are some videos I think you might find interesting.

by davebe
1
Questionable 1 point ago +1 / -0

"The Suez is a legitimate international hub. You do not often here of racketeering or piracy in the area."

When the entire fiat banking system is fraud, you can not outright state such as a fact. International trade only exists to further that fraud. So to claim it is legitimate hub of international trade in itself is a falsehood. Anything of substantial value to required purchasing from outlying nations, is costly enough to merit being shipped via express air travel.

Everything else is grain, oil waste products, and cotton.

by pkvi
3
Questionable 3 points ago +3 / -0

I didn't make an argument for you to say this of. Everything you are talking about is happening exclusively inside your own head. I literally echoed back your own words, so that you could better understand yourself.

by pkvi
3
Questionable 3 points ago +3 / -0

"Now reply with some flippant bullshit and defend (to the death, I might add)"

Not very self aware are we?

5
Questionable 5 points ago +5 / -0

Wow. That's like four people! You using that non racist math I've been hearing about? Because Good work! Good work on you! You pathetic glue soaked bath sponge.

1
Questionable 1 point ago +1 / -0

No damn it. Next time try. Try harder. Try much harder and make a real statement.

1
Questionable 1 point ago +1 / -0

Maybe so. But you didn't address any of my Questions.

4
Questionable 4 points ago +4 / -0

Yes. We can tell that you are not trying. At least you are self aware.

5
Questionable 5 points ago +5 / -0

"or what have you."

OK. You are going to have to tell us. This is your thread buddy. And it is a picture of a quarter. One you chose to not even orient properly. ░

1
Questionable 1 point ago +1 / -0

"Yeah those evil vitamins"

Amazing! I said snake oil, and you replied, implying I said vitamins. It's almost as though you reacted in anger at something I didn't even say, and garnered up votes for it.

You should try your luck on reddit. I hear they they will actually pay you crypto for reactionary replies such as yours. Don't think! react in anger! That's a good militant.

Or am I getting this wrong? Was I getting down voted for wishing him luck in his future endeavors? Changing my stance, or admitting I was wrong in public? You tell me.

by davebe
1
Questionable 1 point ago +1 / -0

You didn't answer either of my Questions. in fact, you avoided answering my Questions. So I will ask them again:

Is the Northern passage shorter than going south past the tip of South Africa?

Is taking the northern passage cheaper than the fees incurred by using the the Sues Canal?

My Questions are of course, based on a globe based Earth model.

Now for a third Question. Do you suppose, people use the Sues Canal due to racketeering concerns and payments incurred due to money laundering?

by davebe
1
Questionable 1 point ago +1 / -0

Alternatively, is it shorter than the southern passage, and cheaper than paying for passage through the canal?

by davebe
1
Questionable 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's not really 'viable' if your money laundering schemes involve the Suez Canal.

1
Questionable 1 point ago +1 / -0

Maybe. But doesn't that make him propaganda for the truthers movement? Is he necessary for waking up the masses? Is he doing his part? Yes, or no?

3
Questionable 3 points ago +3 / -0

My main gripe with Alex Jones over the years was his shady adds, selling snake oil on his site... In retrospect, I now understand why he felt he needed that revenue stream.

Good luck to him in his future endeavors.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›