"The Suez is a legitimate international hub. You do not often here of racketeering or piracy in the area."
When the entire fiat banking system is fraud, you can not outright state such as a fact. International trade only exists to further that fraud. So to claim it is legitimate hub of international trade in itself is a falsehood. Anything of substantial value to required purchasing from outlying nations, is costly enough to merit being shipped via express air travel.
Everything else is grain, oil waste products, and cotton.
You didn't answer either of my Questions. in fact, you avoided answering my Questions. So I will ask them again:
Is the Northern passage shorter than going south past the tip of South Africa?
Is taking the northern passage cheaper than the fees incurred by using the the Sues Canal?
My Questions are of course, based on a globe based Earth model.
Now for a third Question. Do you suppose, people use the Sues Canal due to racketeering concerns and payments incurred due to money laundering?
yes on a FE model, no on a Globe.
no, due to short season and massive ice breaking costs.
Personally no. The Suez is a legitimate international hub. You do not often here of racketeering or piracy in the area.
When the entire fiat banking system is fraud, you can not outright state such as a fact. International trade only exists to further that fraud. So to claim it is legitimate hub of international trade in itself is a falsehood. Anything of substantial value to required purchasing from outlying nations, is costly enough to merit being shipped via express air travel.
Everything else is grain, oil waste products, and cotton.