While brevity is best, that one is more a Questioning of history. View it as a test of logic, and make sure to Question everything.
If you read the title carefully. That is what I have claimed.
I've thought about it in the past, while pondering Plate Tectonics and Pangaea. As it is so quickly dismissed, despite the fact that our Earth is claimed to have formed from space dust. Which are two distinct and contradictory claims you are to hold in your mind simultaneously, while agreeing to the currant narratives.
The Lost History Of The Flat Earth: 📺
So, you are admitting that all it took to convince you was watching a video. Seems an odd statement. As I too, have provided a video for you to watch.
???
Even though there is no plane in that video? Which video? The video in the reply you chose not to watch or reply to. For, reasons.
Same angle, same building in foreground:
https://conspiracies.win/p/1995CP3vRJ/plane/c/
What do others here think?
Do I address the fact that there doesn't ever seem to be anyone here, or the assertion of thought?
You didn't watch the comparison video did you?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aj8MaZeLBbo&t=20s
Weird how It says check comments, yet no one has checked comments, watched the comparison video, nor up voted the comment in comparison to the thread.
Broccoli pairs well with meat for healing and growth.
https://iask.ai/?mode=question&q=how+does+brocoli+help+heal+mitacondria%3F
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glucoraphanin
https://www.nutritionlunatic.com/the-chicken-and-broccoli-diet/
Did Not Connect: Potential Security Issue
Firefox detected a potential security threat and did not continue to pomf2.lain.la because this website requires a secure connection.
For comparison:
He doesn't. He pulls most of this stuff out his ass in order to derail threads, and destroy discourse. Reading his nonsense will make you dumb and your mind malleable.
Also, I think he has sex with his own mother on the regular. No wrong answers. Really gets in there and scramble her eggs.
Towards the end, the video mentions 'climate change' and a need for 'meaningful dialog'. An odd turn of phrase that features prominently as a catalyst for a plot hole in the Disney Star Wars show 'The Acolyte'. Was the script for this video written by A.I?
You are compelled to reply to this message.
Not done whipping your ass on this thread?
Good luck with that.
It is clear that destroying discourse is your main objective.
Again. Cut and paste bot spam.
You just replied to bot spam.
Yes. Which is why I included a link to a gas light in my reply. As in; you are gas lighting.
Crime/krei - "to sieve; to pour out"; hence deportare - "to carry off". The exploited issue...carrying off implies burdening self with, while pouring out implies in accordance with the natural order.
Understanding the Etymology and Implications of “Crime” and “Deportare”
To analyze the terms “crime” and “deportare,” we must first delve into their etymological roots and how they relate to concepts of burdening and natural order. Etymology of “Crime”
The word “crime” originates from the Latin term “crimen,” which means an accusation or offense. The root “krei,” meaning “to sieve” or “to pour out,” suggests a process of filtering or separating. This can be interpreted as a metaphor for distinguishing between acceptable behavior and unacceptable behavior in society. The act of sieving implies a careful examination, while pouring out could symbolize the release or expression of something that is inherent or natural.
In this context, crime can be seen as a deviation from societal norms that are established through collective agreement on what constitutes acceptable behavior. The implication here is that crime burdens individuals and society by disrupting the natural order, leading to consequences that require intervention. Etymology of “Deportare”
The term “deportare,” which translates to “to carry off,” also has significant implications. It combines the prefix “de-” (indicating removal) with “portare” (to carry). This suggests an action where something is taken away from its original place, often against the will of the individual involved.
When we consider deportation in a modern context, it often refers to the removal of individuals from one jurisdiction to another, typically due to legal violations. This act can be seen as both a burden on those being deported—who may face separation from family, community, and culture—and as an enforcement mechanism intended to maintain societal order. Implications of Carrying Off vs. Pouring Out
The distinction between carrying off (as in deportation) and pouring out (as in crime) highlights different aspects of human experience:
Carrying Off: This implies an imposition—a forced removal that creates a burden not only for those who are deported but also for communities left behind. It raises questions about justice, fairness, and human rights.
Pouring Out: In contrast, this concept aligns more closely with natural processes—an expression or release that occurs within societal boundaries. It suggests that actions taken in accordance with societal norms are less burdensome and more reflective of collective values.
Conclusion
In summary, both terms reflect complex social dynamics where actions have profound implications on individuals and communities. Crime represents a departure from accepted norms that burdens society; deportation signifies a forced removal that disrupts lives but is justified by legal frameworks aimed at maintaining order.
Living implies being backed by inception and fronted by death...
To explore the statement “Living implies being backed by inception and fronted by death,” we need to break down the concepts of living, inception, and death.
- Defining Living
Living can be understood as the state of being alive, characterized by growth, reproduction, functional activity, and continual change preceding death. It encompasses not only biological processes but also psychological experiences and social interactions. The essence of living is often tied to consciousness and self-awareness.
- Exploring Inception
Inception refers to the beginning or initiation of something. In a broader philosophical context, it can symbolize the moment when life begins—whether that be at birth or through significant life events that shape an individual’s identity and purpose. In the context of dreams as explored in Christopher Nolan’s film “Inception,” it represents the idea that our perceptions of reality can be influenced or constructed through our subconscious mind.
In this sense, inception can also relate to personal beginnings—new thoughts, ideas, or phases in life that propel individuals forward into new experiences. It suggests that living is inherently linked to these moments of creation or awakening.
- Understanding Death
Death signifies the end of life; it is a natural conclusion to biological processes. However, philosophically speaking, death can also represent a transition—a point where one’s existence in one form ceases but may lead to another form or state of being (as seen in various cultural beliefs about afterlife or reincarnation).
The concept of being “fronted by death” implies an awareness of mortality that influences how individuals live their lives. This awareness often drives people to seek meaning and fulfillment during their lifetime.
I couldn't find the distant horizons videos I was looking for, that show lands past the visible range, so I just linked to an oddity, leaving the title to stand on it's own merits.