Context. You can't ask Questions of events nobody understands or knows of.
Oh, no. This was posted just 6 days ago.... Speaking of which, you can stop scrolling now.
So, Barack Obama, George Bush Sr, George Bush Jr, Bill Clinton, Dick Cheney. Let me know if I missed anyone, because, I don't think I missed anyone.
Just look at those white devils, forensifying in teams like some sort of auditors of doom. DOOM I TELL YOU!
If I called you unhinged, would you make a thread about it?
If these "forever chemicals" are in everything, then you best option is still breast milk. Provided you haven't been vaccinated for Covid of course.
So, are we just accusing anyone we disagree with, as pedophiles?
To answer a Question.
Ignore everything you are reading here. It's all Questionable at best.
The image in the sidebar is from a Time magazine's article, where they straight up admit to fraud.
"That’s why the participants want the secret history of the 2020 election told, even though it sounds like a paranoid fever dream–a well-funded cabal of powerful people, ranging across industries and ideologies, working together behind the scenes to influence perceptions, change rules and laws, steer media coverage and control the flow of information."
I was in a college art class back in the late 90's. Upon being asked by our professor our opinions on the art of the 20th century, the entire class had one answer for him. Every one of us told him it wasn't art, but fraud.
I'd pay no more than $500.00 for that piece, without the frame. The frame adds no value to that painting, and any decor that can accompany that frame would not benefit from the painting it holds.
No. It's true. I believe them. It's just not the most relevant fact in a MURDER case.
So it is your claim that they knowingly intended harm? Along with all of America that went along with it, placing masks on their children, whom were committing child abuse. Guess we will have to lock up all of America then.
Maybe we could build a prison wall around it's border.
Well, well. Now ain't this some shit.
But you've drank water I assume? You can O.D on water, throwing off your electrolyte balance thus dying.
You can also be sexually aroused by a line drawing. You can't however have sexual relations with a drawing.
Look, I'm going to be honest, It sound's as though you are just trying to make excuses to do as you wish, without considering the consequences. Those consequences are harming children. Don't hurt children. It's that simple to understand.
And if you didn't pick up on the innuendo I dropped earlier, "Handle It" was a euphemism for masturbation. As again, you can no more rape adults you desire, than you should those underage.
Sort your shit Bro.
A lot of these people actually think they are helping. They believe germ theory, they believe vaccines work. It has has been the predominate accepted norm for the past 150 years.
Just a reminder, this is what I replied to:
"How about we punish every single "officer" that enforced such blisteringly retarded psychosis?"
Are you actually going to call every single police officer that enforced this a psycho, that knowingly acted in bad faith? That's a little far fetched don't you think?
Hell it took me until last February before I stared to realized something was wrong. Now picture the other 300 Million American's that are just now figuring it out THIS February. Did they all knowingly act in bad faith as well?
Doing cocaine is natural, as it is what our body craves. There are inherent dangerous in natural urges. With cocaine the primary danger is to yourself. With sex crimes, the dangers are to others. In this case, the most vulnerable amongst us.
Look, people often times masturbate instead of raping the people they are infatuated with. With that in mind, I'm certain that most adults can HANDLE their sexual urges, without hurting others.
Just as most functioning adults frequent Starbucks in the morning, as apposed to hitting up Uncle Tony's for a gram of coke.
Forced diversity, is not diversity. It is created conflicted designed to foster division.
Then you would need to start by punishing Ron DeSantis himself. Along with nearly all Floridians. You just can't. Push to far in either direction, and you have totalitarianism. These are crimes of intent, and only those knowingly acting in bad faith can be punished. Or next thing you know, we will be punishing kindergarten teachers 50 years from now, for their 'crimes against humanity.' Let me know if that sounds familiar to you.
Whatever you think is happening here. It is not.
I only gave you something to think about. Nothing more. Nothing less.
The character's head is large. He sits in judgment. The artists vainly used his own likeness. His torch is small, dwarfed by the ego of the sleepy eyed man wielding said flame. This singular golden highlight doing little to distract from it's drab nature.
Onlookers struggle to advert their eyes as they pass by the solemn vestige. It sits in the shadows of towering structures much older than itself, adding little to the decor, unable to signify meaning of it's own. There is no plaque in memorandum of any particular events. It is in fact ugly, and distasteful. Not something fit for display.
What in fact is the artist trying to tell us here? What does it tell us of the "BLM" movement? Is this the ugly truth the masses refuse to see? And just as important to ask, is this the imagery the artist intended, or were his hands guided by another.
That's a good Question. You should think on it for a while.
So, you didn't ask a Question, but the title of the video does, and then it answers that Question in the first 20 seconds...
"Lost .winner".