All of the redacted sections marked as (b)(4) refer to technology within a weapons system. the last redaction is followed by a statement on sterility.
Not entirely true. But all media can be used as propaganda regardless of intent.
On the rising tab? Where rising is determined by a base threshold? Gosh I wonder what could cause this basic function of math.
Because he says so? Great idea. Lets see how well that works for me. Here it goes:
MagaPede69 brainwashed commie traitor should accept he's wrong about voter fraud, If not, most people would say, "You're an idiot!"
There. I'm sure you will now see reason. It's as simple as that. and my work here is now done.
Someone should remind them that the News is not simply 'stories'.
Yes, that is a more accurate Quote. And it changes next to nothing. Do you want to know what nonsense looks like?
"Another episode of ragebait theater."
The only word in that sentence that I can not dispute, is the word "of" as it's only purpose is to support the sentence structure itself.
There is no 'rage' in this thread. This is not 'theater', that is a quote, and a direct link to a video. This is no more bait, than any other thread is. This is not 'another of 'anything', other than another thread in a forum you are choosing to participate in.
Now is this the link you were looking for? Duhhhh....
I find Brother Nathanael to be an interesting man.
I believe he just admitted to practicing the same business model as Epstein. You know, black mail, child trafficking.
It's over whenever you say it's over. And not a moment sooner.
Honestly, to me it seems they just overplayed their hand. They assumed that their narrative of Milley the hero was so strong that they could openly admit to treason without an investigation.
In V for Vendetta, V was in control of the fate computer.
Question? Who's in control of the algorithms? And why do those in charge so blindly go along with these narratives?
I'm assuming that allowing it to expire will trigger something. And that this is delays whatever that something is. Pure speculation on my part.
I don't care about his death, provided that it was from the 'covid-19 delta/Indian variant'.
I do however care to point out the flaw in the logic of those who do, and will use it to push the experimental gene therapy.
Which was the reason I posted, proving a link, and a quote.
Well yes. Though I assume the person who would normally review a statement such as this, before being put up on the website would be Steele himself.
With all due respect. I don't care.
Why is it always a horizontal collage when it comes to the chans?
"Can you provide a list?"
I doubt he can. In my opinion he is simply reacting to a few random stories he has read, as the media wishes for him to, and drawing his conclusions in the same manner.
I'm fairly certain that most everyone reading this understands they are talking about the active ingredients, and not the saline solution containing those ingredients.
Inventory lists? Or just a few photos of sand people waving guns about?
Did you click on the link?
So, who are 'at risk'? Her child trafficking friends and associates?
My problem with this drawing is a simple one.
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=air+cargo+pallets&t=hy&va=g&iar=images&iax=images&ia=images
Right. Because they aren't designed for research. They are designed for conversations that self expire. Only the most autistic are capable of using them to present information to any effect.
What you are thinking of, is a standard forum format. Linear without threads, but possessing a permanent record.
For reasons related to the endorphin feedback loop, and the dominance of smart phones. People refuse to use them, in spite of their clear usefulness.
But we already have 4chan, and those sites are actually harder to use, and less reliable. Finding actual information on image boards, is like finding a needle in a hay stack. Which is why we need to find their reposts elsewhere, on sites such as the .win network.
Sure they have their usefulness, but those sites already exist.
I would say the CIA is aligned with the world banks, while the treasury, has split from it.
So what they have given us, is a fragment of information from one of the pages without context? As the frame the information contains has information edited by the writer of the article, we know that not even the text box displayed was in the report.
Simple Question, is the information displayed representative of post or pre-audit? Who can say, as that article sure doesn't.