Aren't you the guy who arranged to have me BANNED from The Great Awakening for posting in Flat Earth threads here? Can you not go a day without posting Flat Earth content?
What the hell man. Every Flat Earth thread I see now, is posted by YOU!!!
I almost made it an entire morning without reading about Flat Earth. Thank you for that!
/rent free
Actually, that's the goal of a nuclear deterrent.
What are the repercussions of Norway's actions?
Why Norway is nervous:
https://conspiracies.win/p/16aAIRLC7D/according-to-reporter-seymour-he/c/
They didn't stop. They were ordered to keep driving until it crashed. Then they manually detonated it. But you already knew all that from our interactions yesterday, and are just playing games to push your climate change lock downs narrative. Which clearly leads us to ignoring this event.
https://conspiracies.win/p/16aADse5sA/ohio-gov-mike-dewine-says-the-ra/c/
What you want an MSN link? HOW ABOUT THE FUCKING GOVERNOR OF THE MOTHER FUCKING STATE??!
https://patriots.win/p/16aADse5TP/ohio-gov-mike-dewine-says-the-ra/c/
https://video.twimg.com/amplify_video/1625602889732292609/vid/1920x1080/86ElfSaonrE13tjn.mp4?tag=16
What's the difference between a demokkkrat panicking over the BP oil spill or you panicking over a train car on fire?
wheat fields. water supplies, people. vinyl chloride. Cancer. And nothing else as environmentalism has nothing to do with fake climate change.
And what exactly is the conspiracy theory? They wrecked the train on purpose?
They detonated them on purpose. We have been discussing this for days now!
Some here acting like climate alarmists over a chemical fire
That's you! I've already mentioned this has NOTHING TO DO WITH FAKE CLIMATE CHANGE TO YOU IN THIS THREAD! You are now actively lying or evading the truth!
A distraction that everyone is trying to silence? Including you?
Yagh, sure, that makes a lot of sense. In fact, it makes all the cents in the world!
"we want you to"
Wait. Who the fuck is this "we" he speaks of?
Submission Statement:
For a video being pushed to the mainstream, I found it to be surprisingly insightful.
"war of choice". What an odd way to refer to "Operation Desert Shied".
It's a bit of a dry read. But then again, articles didn't used to be so sensationalized in the past, and were more factual based.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Business_Times
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IBT_Media
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Jang
https://www.newsweek.com/newsweek-sues-david-jang-leader-sect-under-federal-investigation-1723056
David Jang is described in the lawsuit as an "alter-ego" of companies and other entities that owe Newsweek money,
Johnathan Davis, who owns the other 50 percent, accused Pragad of weaponizing the newsroom in a corporate battle when Newsweek reported that agents of the Homeland Security Department had searched the premises of Olivet University in Anza, California, as part of an ongoing probe into money laundering, visa fraud and labor trafficking.
He never does. Not only does he not wish to get involved in details, he doesn't wish to share his motives or actual beliefs. It's as though he doesn't believe what he is saying.
Denying that vague sentence on what you believe? Yes. I wish to deny and appose all that you are.
Environmentalism is a conservative value. (conservationism ) It's why we have parks and clean water. Climate change is a farce. Kind of like you, for not knowing the difference, and pulling accusations out your ass.
You think not wanting to consume cancer causing chemicals is "supporting climate lock downs"? The Question isn't if you have been drinkingb It's how drunk were you when you replied, and should you have?
And you can too. Simply by understanding the basic rules of games. ͔̦͉̮̦̇̈́ͯ̈̽͂ͅ ̏