Well, make your own decisions on the material, of course, but I think it's absolute absurd disinfo and you didn't miss anything except one ring of the perpetual circus..
If nothing else, it's definitely not what happened to MH370 I studied that quite closely at the time and have never in the decade since encountered any evidence which persuaded me to change my mind in the slightest.
So I'm looking at this "alien portal" revelation from the perspective that it's a component of a very low-rent initial phase of Project Blue Beam. You don't need real flying saucers or holograms of flying saucers if you can just assign a handful of people to relentlessly push, "There really are flying saucers! Trust me, bro!"
This is what was being sold on r/conspiracy very heavily a few weeks ago. There were multiple posts with upvotes in the thousands (which I did not believe were organic).
EDIT 5 minutes later: I go to r/conspiracy_commons, and sure enough there's a post with a novella-sized tweet from the guy flogging it, Ashton Forbes:
https://twitter.com/JustXAshton/status/1715882849448943786
My name is Ashton Forbes and I am currently disclosing the most important videos in the history of the world.
The videos in question are that of the true fate of Malaysian Airlines Flight 370, on March 7th, 2014 at 18:40UTC at the Nicobar Islands.
So this is round two of the campaign. I'm surprised to see Kim Dotcom joining in. Or maybe they really are the most important videos in the history of the world.
In news from a few days ago, I thought this was a very telling word choice:
BBC Forced to Apologize Over Claim IDF ‘Targeted Medical Teams and Arab Speakers’ in Raid on Hamas Base Hidden Under Hospital (TGP 11/15/2023)
"Forced"? Yeah, I bet they were.
Haha, knew it! Thanks for the demo. For anyone still reading this (which I doubt) that wishes any insight into the how the human mind actually works...
There's this type of "conspiracy theorist" whose overriding imperative is "to be right". That will lead you towards the truth, but will also eventually lead you away as we can see here.
This NPC lacks the self-control and self-awareness to bring itself to use the "block" feature, even after it was told not to read my material. No matter the taunting and ridicule, it still persists. Somehow it all makes sense to it.
You can also be sure it's learning nothing from any of this, and that's not why I'm writing. It's to highlight that it prefers the comfortable world it creates for itself, where it can always be "the smartest guy in the room". The human mind craves comfort of one sort or another at all costs.
Do you see the mental trap one can easily create for oneself, yet still have no awareness of it even when it's pointed out? You'll be able to get to the truth if you can avoid it. And you can also avoid looking like a triggered NPC dipshit.
But you know what? Even after all this, I can assure you it still considers itself "the smartest guy in the room". Pathetic and sad, but they're all around us.
And again, even after all this, it won't be able to resist some parting shot as it walks out the door. Uh oh, see the trap I just set? It just read this and doesn't know what to do: follow it's imperative or confirm all that I said?
It's like Kirk with V'ger... rofl
Yeah, that's what was going on in that extremely weird scene on the street when she was waiting to be picked up. If you very closely and carefully analyze the "event", you realize that's what was actually happening.
And it had to be public (albeit occulted) because, just like with JFK, she had gone against Their wishes. Although I heard it after (which is why I picked up on it), Dave Hodges passed on this very loose rumor he'd heard that They thought she wouldn't survive until the election, but that if she insisted on continuing, They reserved the right to put her to death Themselves.
So what are the chances wild rumor dovetails perfectly with bizarre event? It's a "gating factor" how few can actually believe how strange the world really is.
IDK if this figures in to whatever the argument may be about Charles, but I'm fairly certain he's a clone. I first saw the clone perhaps a couple of years before the Queen died, and I think they permanently substituted him as King a bit before the coronation.
The only reason I post this "crazy" item is that the article itself discusses Hillary having died. I think we can all agree that the current Hillary is closer to the original than a body double could be, so we must presume she's a clone.
I did follow that particular issue in detail and the real Hillary was dying of kuru in the summer of 2016, was publicly executed at the WTC memorial on 9/11 of that year, and was replaced with the clone by the time of the debates.
There's an underlying problem of much longer standing than CGI or DeepFake technology or whatever else. It's that people have nearly no awareness that they might be being deceived.
There are many, many historical photos all the way back to the Civil War (which nearly takes us back to the invention of photography) that are fake. How could they possibly have withstood scrutiny all these decades, long before any modern tech was available to create near flawless phonies? Simple: they were never, ever scrutinized.
The problem is actually even deeper than that. You can point out the obvious flaws and they still do not "get it". Why? Not quite so simple as the last: their worldview--because of fear and/or limits to their imaginative ability--cannot accommodate even entertaining the concept that they have been so universally deceived.
Everyone chooses their own reality, and they cling to it like a man in the middle of the ocean clings to a floating door. Few can bring themselves to let go and try to swim on their own, or even just stand up and realize the water was only four feet deep to begin with. They rant and curse at any who do so as idiots or madmen.
Your self-delusion is not helping anyone, particularly yourself. You can keep all your "helpful" commentary in your own "reality" in the future. I forbid you from reading any of my material.
i used to laugh at people such as you. Now it's all just too common and too pathetic to merit even that much attention.
Just as a point of comparison (and to keep the history alive), even though ice hockey has the reputation as a violent sport, this is the most violent incident I ever knew of (although I'm sure there are others):
The Donald Brashear-Marty McSorley Incident
It took place 2/21/2000, so you can already see how far back we have to go. Interestingly as relative to the current incident, the attacker McSorley was white and the victim Brashear was black.
I think the NHL has ever had at most four black players. But you can see in the article (and I bet in any other writeup you find on the incident), that no one even mentions race.
We never appreciated how good things were without the constant and intense racial division.
I wouldn't necessarily expect to see any fan video. It's been a few years since I went to a live hockey game but hardly anyone bothered taking any pics or video besides selfies and if the mascot came by.
That seems counter-intuitive given today's habit of filming every f-ing thing, but fans attended in person not solely or even primarily because of the hoopla and energy, but because you really do get a different--and in many ways better--feel for the game when you can see the entire rink at once.
Then on top of that, everyone just records the game at home so that if something interesting occurs, they can rewatch it with slo-mo and all the angles and commentary.
Which makes me wonder how the actual broadcast went out. I suspect it was, "And now an extended word from our sponsor, followed by a featurette while officials clean up all the blood."
As to the video, I'd say it wasn't so much of a second kick as that he had his leg locked, was driving it right at the guy's head, and it bounced off his chest/shoulder pads.So again, evidence that he didn't just happen to be swinging his leg for some inexplicable reason.
senior officer rank
Aviation Survival Technician Second Class
Also, "Zach Loesch discharged" turns up no results of Zach Loesch actually being discharged.
And if you bothered to read carefully, I never in the slightest way implied you were lying. It's just that I personally hold my research to a higher standard than what was being asserted as fact.
What I offer to anyone reading this is that these are things to keep in mind if you ever seek to move beyond confirmation of your own conclusions and expect to get to the truth.
I suggest everyone actually take the time to study the BBC writeup as an indication of how surreal "journalism" and "law enforcement" have become.
First, not only is Matt Petgrave not pictured in the article (which has become standard malpractice), he is not even mentioned. Instead, we get this vague construction:
The Nottingham Panthers player was hit in the neck by a skate....
For all we know, a white hetero Christian fascist threw it from the stands. Then we are told of the "investigation":
"We have been carrying out extensive inquiries to piece together the events which led to the loss of Adam..."
WTF? It was televised. There is, of course, no link to the video, and they talk like he was abducted by a flying saucer. And I'm sure this next bit information originally came in response to the police investigator asking, "Jeez, doc, what the hell do you think happened to him?":
A post-mortem examination confirmed he died as a result of a fatal neck injury, South Yorkshire Police said.
They do raise a final mystery, because I can't for the life of me figure out who "the real killer" might have been:
The force said detectives arrested the suspect on Tuesday....
It's all really a new low.
No, I don't remember that guy at all, nor do I discount that they simply made the story up to easily convince the naive, gullible, and frightened minions.
But you'll ask how they can just make things up, and how could it possibly have that strong an effect? No such minions around here, eh, bro?
Well I think that in a lot of instances, as part of the psyop, they way overstated vaxx mandate compliance rates all across the spectrum, and I've never once heard of any auditing.
So suppose you were in charge of some vaxx program and found out that 75% of the targets weren't going along with it. If that gets out, the compliance rate goes down to "true believers" only, it's big news, and you get tossed like a used Kleenex. What to do?
If you've pushed far enough and they're still not going along, just instruct the tech to whisper confidentially, "Okay, pal, I get it and I'm totally with you. I'm just gonna squirt this on the floor. But if you tell anyone, both you and me are going to get torched and I will personally come kick your ass."
I mean, if a Marine general couldn't figure out a way out of it, none of us could.
I wonder if Smith knows who actually blew up the barracks? I sort of suspect he does, and is letting that same group know that there better not be any barracks suddenly blowing up this time around as a way to entangle the US in the conflict.
Well, we have this story from three days after his hospitalization, albeit from a site all the "smart" people consider fiction:
White Hats Investigate Possibility of Foul Play Regarding General Smith’s Heart Attack (RRN 11/2/2023)
And if anyone is concerned as to the results and his status, there's this follow-up story five days later:
General Smith Shot With Heart Attack Gun, Findings Say (RRN 11/5/2023)
I haven't tried to follow the Sudan situation, but from the little I understand there's a lot to understand. The first part is that the West has been fucking with the poor place for over a decade.
Coincidentally, I just tonight posted over on r/conspiracy about the whole "Kony 2012" psyop and how George Clooney was a spy. When I went to check my notes on Sudan I found that even the mainstream admitted what a catastrophe the Neo-Colonialists had created with the South Sudan situation:
George Clooney, South Sudan and How the World's Newest Nation Imploded (Newsweek 10/2/2014)
The point is, I would not be quick to come to a conclusion as to exactly what Egypt was doing over there, especially in a place so distant from the flow of even alternative news. I mean, three decades after the fact, they've still got everyone convinced the Rwandan genocide was exactly the reverse of what it really was.
For me, the key to understanding events would be deciding basically whether Sisi is a "good guy" or a "bad guy". I've recently seen a push for "Sisi is a crypto-Jew!" You might think, "Ah, of course, I should have guessed."
But I recall back in the Libyan situation, watching a mainstream report where the guy said, "About 25% of Libyans think Gaddafi is secretly a Jew." I thought it was such an odd thing at the time it stuck in my mind. The point is, I think we may be seeing the same thing when they need to discredit someone in the Arab world (and amongst conspiracy theorists).
I feel confident that 5 such mysterious soldiers died suddenly in what we're supposed to believe was a "helicopter mishap".
I suspect there will be a series of unfortunate aircraft events and elevated levels of training accidents. Or maybe they'll just save up for one big shipwreck. No rescue, no trace, no survivors, stop talking about it.
I haven't studied the situation closely, but it seems generally agreed by informed and practically-minded people that the two-state solution died a long time ago. There is no possibility of it ever coming into existence, or of working were it somehow forced into being.
If so, it can then be said that everyone talking about it otherwise is misinformed, deluded, or using it as a pretext for some other purpose. As a prime example, various politicians use it to buy time while working on their real agenda.
The big problem is, if it comes down to one state and it's either Israeli or Palestinian, the Zionists understand clearly it's virtually certainly not going to be Israeli.
Everybody else knows that the fanatical Satanic Zionists are cornered animals and will put up as big a fight as possible for as long as possible (because something may break their way, right?), and they are trying their best to find a way to avoid a huge, messy fight.
Israel has never been weaker internally, has less support externally, and created more global outrage than currently. Maybe the cooler, calculating heads will find a way to the conclusion without all the horror and misery.
Right, exactly.
The airplane itself later showed up as "MH17" in pieces all over Ukraine, so we know for sure what happened to the hardware.
IIRC, after it left Kuala Lumpur there was something about the plane going super-high and maybe depressurizing, so many of the passengers may have died from that. But then there was the famous Philip Wood text from DG itself, so some fraction made it alive.
Since no one has ever seen any of the passengers or crew since then, the only conclusion seems to be that any survivors were simply put to death and dumped out in the Indian Ocean.
All in all, pretty f-ing chilling. Makes me wish they actually had been abducted by a UFO.