750+ Studies About the Dangers of the COVID-19 Injections, last updated March 31, 2022.
How to instantly discredit yourself... Talk about the Flat Earth conspiracy!
Even if this is true, which I sincerely doubt given the over whelming evidence, it 1000% causes more harm than good. i.e. Biden stole the election of Trump... "what ever you frigging flat earthier!"
What frigging difference would it make if the world is flat or a globe. Zero, none, nana, zilch..
We know that those in power have sought to discredit conspiracies, but this literary takes the cake. Move on please...
#MoreHarmThanGood
Here is a link to a list of 1000 Peer Reviewed Studies Questioning Covid-19 Vaccine Safety
One down, 69 to go! Lets see how we go with Event 2.
You need a reverse osmosis water filter to remove Fluoride from water (see example in link below) as they are can remove over 98% of impurities including Organic & Inorganic Minerals, Heavy Metals & Fluoride. The 3M one is only a "activated carbon" water filter. Whole house reverse osmosis water filter are expensive and impractical, so best to buy a smaller unit for drinking and cooking.
Agree they are talking about mRNA vaccines, but the 36sec video doesn't mention which one (i.e. one of the existing "approved" or the failed Australian vaccine). Thus why i asked for a link to the full BBC video.
We are fighting an up hill battle so we need to be as accurately as possible, otherwise, we'll not be taken seriously. Credibility is the most important thing when fighting an information war. That was the point i was attempting to make, I'm sorry it came across rude, that was not my intent.
Pretty sure they're talking about the Australian COVID vaccine which caused a HIV false positive and thus was subsequently scrapped, see link below.
Please don't take offense, but I feel we need to be more diligent to ensure our rebuttals are accurate and/or not taken out of context so they are not easily dismissed as "conspiracy theory nonsense". Appreciate it easily say, but difficult in reality.
Looking at table 14 (also see link to report below) the unvaccinated consistently have the lowest age-standardised case of infection per 100,000 people, thereby one could assume their immune systems are on average “better” at resisting infection than single, double and triple vaccinated people.
When you look at Tables 15 and 16, single and double vaccinated people on average have a higher rate of age-standardised hospital admissions and death per 100,000 people than the unvaccinated. This is consistent with above that unvaccinated immune systems are on average “better” at fighting infection than single and double vaccinated people. However, the data indicates the opposite is true for triple vaccinated people (i.e. lower age-standardised hospital admissions and death per 100,000 people) compared with the unvaccinated.
The MSM would use this data to highlight the importance of the booster, but our immune systems don’t get Alzheimer’s, once the ace binding receptor learns to bind to spike protein our immune system does not forget. Proof of this is how people who contracted SARS 17 years ago have natural immunity to COVID, despite the genetic code being ~20% different (will chase down the reference).
My theory is the lower hospital admissions and death of the triple vaccinated is related to the vaccine “pre-culling” the weak and susceptible proportion of the triple vaccinated population prior to any being infected with COVID and dying in the real world, thereby inflating the effectiveness of the vaccines?
Either way, the data appears contradictory and thus warrants further investigation. Keen for people’s critical analysis of this Hypothesis
Glad you enjoyed. One on my favorite quotes from the first Dune book (didn't make in the recent 2021 movie) is "The sleeper must awaken!" The 1984 version did... Interestingly it was 1984, just a coincidence I'm sure!
14% NPCs, bots and/or just out right WE-Ftards!?