you are constantly lying. the absolute prerequisite for being a flat Earth moron.
You assume the earth is a globe before starting your math
no .
- you are a moron.
- you cannot refute what I showed.
- you can hide because you're a worthless human being.
I showed that observation matches the human race's thousands of years knowledge of the circumference of the Earth. observation matches claim.
every correct demonstration would have a faggot Flat Earth scumbag saying : the correct proof assumed the correct observation. that is you.
- you have no understanding of science or the scientific method.
- you have not refuted with any other matching of observation with claim. you can't and you never will.
- you are an inferior person. that is why you are posting Flat Earth bullshit.
I doubt you're following
say your thing about balloons holding up the stars again. one more time. show what kind of person you are.
I agree with all the people who know: you are a worthless fucking moron.
need to stick to what you can observe.
if you weren't so stupid you would see that I did stick to what I - and anyone else - can observe. I matched my own personal observations - that anyone can reproduce - with the claim. of course they match because the claim is true. if the claim was not true they would not match. they matched.
your broad-band ignorance stretches to ignorance of the scientific method.
I am suspecting that you are an institution and allowed to use the computers and the internet. and here we are.
Oh, you mean like this:
- distance to centre of earth, R, is 6360km, 6360E3 m, depending where on earth I am
- My viewing height is 2m, say
- d is the distance to the horizon, where my line of sight hits the horizon.
Note: Flat Earth morons both disbelieve (paid to) and believe (every day observations) the existence of the horizon.
Question: does the calculated 'd' match the observed 'd'
Calculated d
The tangent (my view to the horizon) , which is d, is at right angles to the line of the earth's radius R. That is what a tangent is.
So there is a right-angled triangle:
- side length R to the centre of the spherical earth (side a)
- side length d my view to the horizon, length to be solved for (side b)
- hypotenuse R + my height. (side hyp)
a^2 + b^2 = hyp^2 : Pythagorean theorem
R^2 + d_to_horizon^2 = (R + my height)^2 : stick in our, my variables
R^2 + d_to_horizon^2 = R^2 + 2Rxh + h^2 : expand (a + b)^2 to a^2 +2ab + b^2
d_to_horizon^2 = 2Rxh + h^2 : remove R^2 from both sides
d_to_horizon = sqrt(2Rxh + h^2) : sqrt() of both sides
d_to_horizon = sqrt(2Rxh) : same
d_to_horizon = sqrt(2x 6360,000 x 2) or = sqrt(2 x 6360,000m x 2 + 4m ) : same
d_to_horizon = sqrt(2x6360,000x2)
d_to_horizon = 5044m = 5 km.
Observed d, d_to_horizon
Where I live, on the beach, there is an island about 5 km away. (thanks google maps). The horizon is slightly behind that, when viewed from the beach. I will be generous and say that the observed horizon is 6km (and also that the horizon actually exists).
Next time, maybe today (watch for an update) I will look for the horizon from the sea-line.
anyway, roughly correct:
- observed horizon 6km,
- calculated horizon 5km.
Check the curve for yourself, what should the curve look like given the slope the earth would need if it really was 24,900 miles around.
Hmm, ok.
- distance to centre of earth, R, is 6360km, 6360E3 m, depending where on earth I am
- My viewing height is 2m, say
- d is the distance to the horizon, where my line of sight hits the horizon. Note that Flat Earth morons both disbelieve (paid to) and believe (every day observations) the existence of the horizon.
Question: does the calculated 'd' match the observed 'd'
Calculated d
The tangent (my view to the horizon) , which is d, is at right angles to the line of the earth's radius R. That is what a tangent is.
So there is a right-angled triangle:
- side length R to the centre of the spherical earth (side a)
- side length d my view to the horizon, length to be solved for (side b)
- hypotenuse R + my height. (side hyp)
a^2 + b^2 = hyp^2 : Pythagorean theorem
R^2 + d_to_horizon^2 = (R + my height)^2 : stick in our, my variables
R^2 + d_to_horizon^2 = R^2 + 2Rxh + h^2 : expand (a + b)^2 to a^2 +2ab + b^2
d_to_horizon^2 = 2Rxh + h^2 : remove R^2 from both sides
d_to_horizon = sqrt(2Rxh + h^2) : sqrt() of both sides
d_to_horizon = sqrt(2Rxh) : same
d_to_horizon = sqrt(2x 6360,000 x 2) or = sqrt(2 x 6360,000m x 2 + 4m ) : same
d_to_horizon = sqrt(2x6360,000x2)
d_to_horizon = 5044m = 5 km.
Observed d, d_to_horizon
Where I live, on the beach, there is an island about 5 km away. (thanks google maps). The horizon is slightly behind that, when viewed from the beach. I will be generous and say that the observed horizon is 6km (and also that the horizon actually exists).
Next time, maybe today (watch for an update) I will look for the horizon from the sea-line.
anyway, roughly correct:
- observed horizon 6km,
- calculated horizon 5km.
Of course.
at least you will get you $1.50 or however much you are paid per post. If the block function worked on this forum then I would never have to see your dishonest, retarded jibberish ever again.
No, the curvature was not needed for those bridges, or any bridges
Flat earther lying again (FELA)
snipers, there's no adjustment for corrialis or curve.
FELA
It's not like you have ever even tried to verify anything.
FELA. I lived in the midwest, the earth-aligning curves are real . I live on the planet, and neither I nor you can see the Eiffel Tower.
Trust me,
No one would ever trust you.
Trust me, determining the earth is flat, for yourself, is an intellectual challenge.
"challenge" might not be the correct word,
.
I get it: Compulsive liars with no self respect become flat earthers. Gotta get that FELA
There probably isn't an edge because the idea of a giant sun and huge planets and infinite universe is all institutionalized bullshit.
Who? is batshit crazy again.
You believe I am a flat earther because I said the earth is flat.
Who is batshit crazy again?
Observation shows a flat and stationary earth
Who is batshit crazy here?
The land we are standing on might go on for infinity.
(love the "might".) Yeah, infinity dude. You have to bring "(might be) infinity " to support your batshit argument.
for you:
belief:
- the third bridge across the bosphorus and the Dardanelles bridge and that long bridge in New York
- curvature added to longitude, lattitude aligned roads
reality:
- made up FBI-faggot traitor psy-op flat earth.
pathetic. Of course.
Tell me FE genius:
-
Where is the edge of your (pretend, non-existent) Flat Earth? The last answer one of you fools gave me was "The Antarctic Ice Wall". Can you improve in stupidity on that?
-
Can you go to the top of your (FBI-traitor faggots) building and wave to me? I am at sea-level, so I'll be able to see you
Exosomes don’t prove the existence of viruses.
You are correct; I did not mean that they did.
I was just trying to make a strong, true statement: "Exosomes exist ... "
Well, exosomes are real; non-exosome cellular detritus, shit, is real. Some large items that have been called "viruses" have been photo'd.
But you are 100% correct (I think) if you re-worded to something like:
"AFAIK there seems to be, neither, any worthwhile evidence for "it's viruses" nor for for the existence of v____ that match (at all) what are claimed of these v____s"
No, it is not worth looking into. it's purely false made up lies psyop.
no there is no redeeming hidden truth. you and all your other paid Comrades psi-op pushing liars.
the surface of the earth does curve you fucking moron. [ sorry let me be clear: I know that neither you nor anyone else really believes this Flat Earth bullshit. the calling you a moron it's like a shorthand]
-
Long Bridges such as the third bridge across the bosphorus and the Dardanelles bridge and that long bridge in New York that I forget the name of all have adjustments for the curvature of the Earth built into them.
-
the roads in the American Midwest are built on a mile by mile grid. we are talking across 10 or more States here. ( some roads have now disappeared back into the Wilderness but anyway). every hundred or 150 miles these roads have a swerve built into them to realign them with the latitude and longitude of the Earth. a rectangular or square grid imperfectly projected onto a sphere spheroid. the fucking French Engineers.
it should be " Who ...." Sorry.
Ah, that's your thing. you - for some reason - come to forums like this and tell lies. I have been thinking that everything you post is retarded.
now I get it. it's not retarded per se, you are here to tell lies. got it.
The Flat Earth Psy-op and the faked moon landings, also a kinda psy-op, are different. And, of course, I would never believe in either of them.
maybe you are mentally ill?
Satellites hang from fucking balloons
yeah, ok dude.
Flat Earth is a retarded psy-op.
you are a pusher of a retarded psy-op.
at least you're getting paid, or being let off whatever charges were brought against you , or gaining class credits for your traitor class, or whatever the deal is.
well, that was irrelevant.
I have never seen you to not be a piece of shit. And this is no exception.
If you are not israeli, then those US taxpayer-funded mobsters with their pretend religion would definitely give your citizenship based on your posting history.
it's fake or the guy is fake. I read his assertion his document. he purposely and dishonestly conflates excess to open source code with access to the data, and stealing of data with stealing of and manipulation of executable code.
he doesn't do it directly: sites articles that talk about the stealing of data and the use of open-source code, end dishonestly claims that these references talk about stealing a manipulation of executable code.
it's fake: it's Democrat: it's fake
Compare:
he
- 1900 words of ordered, packed historical info
you:
- lied that being called something in a movie is not being called something
- "Are you 12?"
Dude, this forum is not for you
any thinking person would believe RT ahead of the New York Times.
TPTB must be trying to damp down this - yes fake - rumor. soon we will be hearing Flat Earth bullshit too.
mental illness conflating wordplay with reality
is it a line or a slope? you don't know the difference.
faggot Flat Earth faggot assumes a flat Earth