Joe Rogan on the moon landing
(media.gab.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (57)
sorted by:
The Flat Earth Psy-op and the faked moon landings, also a kinda psy-op, are different. And, of course, I would never believe in either of them.
I know it's gonna sound retarded to you, but yes, flat earth is a psy op. The flat earth society has clear connection to cabal and CIA. Why?
I also never believe anything, so I went out to see what the flat earth psy op was really about. And once you realize what's controlled psy op and what is real, you can use math, observation and logical reasoning to see that we really all have been totally programmed. The surface of earth doesn't curve. The idea of gravity holding particles against an infinite vacuum is stupid...it's difficult to trust your own intellectual ability, but If you do look into the real truth earth, it's easy to see without needing to believe anyone.
Impossible for most people to think out of this box. Avoid anything FE that is mainstream. Like graphics of a flat earth next to the other planets, it's absurd. It's supposed to be, so you don't think it's worth looking into. And it works.
No, it is not worth looking into. it's purely false made up lies psyop.
no there is no redeeming hidden truth. you and all your other paid Comrades psi-op pushing liars.
the surface of the earth does curve you fucking moron. [ sorry let me be clear: I know that neither you nor anyone else really believes this Flat Earth bullshit. the calling you a moron it's like a shorthand]
Long Bridges such as the third bridge across the bosphorus and the Dardanelles bridge and that long bridge in New York that I forget the name of all have adjustments for the curvature of the Earth built into them.
the roads in the American Midwest are built on a mile by mile grid. we are talking across 10 or more States here. ( some roads have now disappeared back into the Wilderness but anyway). every hundred or 150 miles these roads have a swerve built into them to realign them with the latitude and longitude of the Earth. a rectangular or square grid imperfectly projected onto a sphere spheroid. the fucking French Engineers.
Just re reading how retarded you sound. Wow. Do you even imagine what it's like when a trump lover argues a Biden lover. You're like that trump lover. Youre smart enough not to be a liberal, but still too gullible to see past Trump's deception
You're fuct, intellectually. Too far from being able to use you common sense to see through the first layer FE psy op.
Like, you probably believe flat earther think earth is a flat disc with an edge, floating around the sun. You're gullible, that's all
The surface doesn't curve, lazy ass.
You just assume you're right, based on your belief and everyone else.
It's sad you won't even try. Giving up thought before even considering it means you fell for the first psy op. Obviously FE is littered with psy op, as you should expect
pathetic. Of course.
Tell me FE genius:
Where is the edge of your (pretend, non-existent) Flat Earth? The last answer one of you fools gave me was "The Antarctic Ice Wall". Can you improve in stupidity on that?
Can you go to the top of your (FBI-traitor faggots) building and wave to me? I am at sea-level, so I'll be able to see you
for you:
belief:
reality:
Don't believe shit. Use scientific method and observation. Confirm for yourself.
Oh, you mean like this:
Note: Flat Earth morons both disbelieve (paid to) and believe (every day observations) the existence of the horizon.
Question: does the calculated 'd' match the observed 'd'
Calculated d
The tangent (my view to the horizon) , which is d, is at right angles to the line of the earth's radius R. That is what a tangent is.
So there is a right-angled triangle:
a^2 + b^2 = hyp^2 : Pythagorean theorem
R^2 + d_to_horizon^2 = (R + my height)^2 : stick in our, my variables
R^2 + d_to_horizon^2 = R^2 + 2Rxh + h^2 : expand (a + b)^2 to a^2 +2ab + b^2
d_to_horizon^2 = 2Rxh + h^2 : remove R^2 from both sides
d_to_horizon = sqrt(2Rxh + h^2) : sqrt() of both sides
d_to_horizon = sqrt(2Rxh) : same
d_to_horizon = sqrt(2x 6360,000 x 2) or = sqrt(2 x 6360,000m x 2 + 4m ) : same
d_to_horizon = sqrt(2x6360,000x2)
d_to_horizon = 5044m = 5 km.
Observed d, d_to_horizon
Where I live, on the beach, there is an island about 5 km away. (thanks google maps). The horizon is slightly behind that, when viewed from the beach. I will be generous and say that the observed horizon is 6km (and also that the horizon actually exists).
Next time, maybe today (watch for an update) I will look for the horizon from the sea-line.
anyway, roughly correct:
No, the slope. As in at what rate is the horizon curving.
Also, center of earth. You assume the earth is a globe before starting your math.
You're right to use trig, just need to stick to what you can observe. Here, I did this analysis to show trig, next to a simple linear slope, because for distances less than 200 miles, the linear fit is close enough and much easier to calculate. Here, I did this on excel https://anonymfile.com/RY3xB/8-inches-per-mile-squared-analysis.xlsx
Now that you know the slope, the rate of curvature, you can begin thinking harder about what that should look like if the earth was a globe. I doubt you're following. But if you're capable, then tell me the answer:
If a boat that was 20 feet tall went out to sea, and you are 2 m tall standing on the edge of the shore, how far could the boat go before you should not be able to see it because it's behind the curve?
You can also use any number of curvature calculators online
is it a line or a slope? you don't know the difference.
faggot Flat Earth faggot assumes a flat Earth
you are constantly lying. the absolute prerequisite for being a flat Earth moron.
no .
I showed that observation matches the human race's thousands of years knowledge of the circumference of the Earth. observation matches claim.
every correct demonstration would have a faggot Flat Earth scumbag saying : the correct proof assumed the correct observation. that is you.
say your thing about balloons holding up the stars again. one more time. show what kind of person you are.
I agree with all the people who know: you are a worthless fucking moron.
if you weren't so stupid you would see that I did stick to what I - and anyone else - can observe. I matched my own personal observations - that anyone can reproduce - with the claim. of course they match because the claim is true. if the claim was not true they would not match. they matched.
your broad-band ignorance stretches to ignorance of the scientific method.
I am suspecting that you are an institution and allowed to use the computers and the internet. and here we are.