Because you are undergoing mostly angular momentum....which does not get affected much by anything you physically can produce....imagine you are being pushed by a shovel millions of times bigger than you....can you jump without using the existing momentum you have accumulated from the shovel....assume it goes 1000x faster than you can.....how can you slow yourself down....???

Well if you understand it...you would understand your rotation at different part of the globe.....

How deep do the submarines go???

I saw that they go about 1km deep.......now...use your fancy stupid calculator and ask yourself....how far can you see when you are 500 ft above the earth?

Also.... according to Wikipedia...the average depth of the oceans is 14000 ft....so let's say they go down 3000 ft and then they ride.....11k ft above the 'floor "curve"'

Infuriating...it's like they beaten up and won't talk about it....but the bully is waiting for them if don't

Angular momentum........look it up....

.....no...unless they were near the bottom of the ocean .....

You do realise that water doesn't block things....and the water....is miles above the ocean floor....so a few feet of xurvate is nothing....

Bullshit....straight bullshit..

15 I believe.....was average......so median cannot be 500 you fucking retard

Canadians are mostly ignorant....my experience is they will rather tow the line than question the situation....it was shameful seeing them fall....I expect the same, but less gung-ho...just blindly following it....

Psyop originally based on Trump...and obviously designed to either bolster him or put him down.... definitely political job....not organic by any means.

They wanted right wingers....

Possibly created by 4Chan operators...but then coopted by intelligence and PACs

Definitely agree with you there. This place is dying and the mods are narcissistic or just part of the problem....there are 5 people who post regularly and one is a mod....the others are obviously paid off...

Sorry, it's the earth spinning....which you are a part of.....if you go far enough up....sure it will be more.impactful....but you cannot lose that much momentum......

Please understand....you are carrying momentum....but you cannot see it......you relative speed.....is not the speed of your angular momentum

.....no...sonar doesn't need a curve....it's medium based.....so it will go through the water....that wave is tiny and you honestly think there is a smooth curve at the bottom of the ocean??? Foolishness I say. It's bumpy as fuck....so any curve will be shadowed by other things....duh ... .

..... Waves....man...waves.... .

Probably was conditioned to take on a more liberal mindset by the higher ups and he probably was seeing it as a chance to show himself as being able to deliver....

I had a thought while reading this post.

I notice that a lot of the companies are run at the very top by rich oligarchs and connected people, but they are not the ones who implement anything.

Instead they get a lot of young 'geniuses' who they promote as being wizards at whatever, but normally they are just well educated, well-off rich families whose kids had access to everything growing up, but who don't actually have much real world experience.

They don't typically have normal career paths, and instead are 'fadttracked' to the top.

I think this is because once you have experience you realise that ideals are dangerous and most often don't really work despite beat intentions, but the elite know this and instead get passionate but naive bright stars and burn them out before they know any better. Then they throw away the honest ones they cannot corrupt or keep working like a machine

Sonar works by generating pings and listening for the reflected sounds.

That works without need for a globe, so I'm not sure what I'm missing.

Is it was empty space....sure. but it's not. The air is fluid...we just don't see it. But it is still a fluid.

To make it more clear. It would require the earth to slow down or speed up it's spin in a relatively quick timeframe for us to notice. The momentum would be steady state on the surface and near surface of the earth..

Like all things, this take everything out of context and presents flaws.

That diagram is not referring to a 'near' sun....nor 'flat earth'....

The models make a point of stating their assumptions....which....if you were a scientist and engineer would need

The sun...is behind the moon....so....all it can light up is the back ....ever see a glowing building at sunset .....?????? If the sun is so big ..why is the front shadowed?????!!!!!

False perspective.....

Literally film uses it for everything

You haven't provided any evident that isn't without a serious flaw.....so when you finally post something without blatant logical problems ... We will listen.

Perhaps....stop saying the moon landing and FE are related.....they are different conspiracies.

It does align....if you ignore the apparent size and realize the sun is so far away that it is impossible to light the other side of the moon....

Gandalf really is that much taller than Frodo....false perspective caused by the mind

They only post images....nothing else

I'm done.....you are wrong. Refraction is the bending of light due to the wavelengths causing them to be reflected or passed, and objects with refractive properties tend to 'bend' light.... That is because the light reflects at barriers and if it loses some of the kinetic energy to reflection it will bend down a bit accordingly. Materials can be created to react to particular wavelengths like filters, etc.

Those mirages are reflected off the waters surface which is reflecting as well as the light goes through the air lense.

If the floor was less reflective it would not 'raise' as much....and you get instead cut off images from the bottom ...things can appear closer such as mountains over plains based on temperature.....etc.

Just stop... believe what you want. Provide evidence that isn't swiss cheese please.

That is not true though either. It would cut a plane across the view based on location on the earth. That would partially overlap on a large part of the spherical globe on each hemisphere. In the winter the stars would be shifted and on the opposite side from the winter, but only a portion would be completely different on the edges of the cut and would vary at times of the year.

It would be at the equator that would have the most variations between views, but likewise, you would have some that are still similar. Nearest the poles.

I am just suggesting that these types of mirages are not good proof. I am not saying the globe is the truth, I am saying that it is possible for lenses to be built or constructed which can tightly capture and reflect the light as needed, but it is also possible that natural lenses can be formed over long distances which can be composed of various layers of water, and air of various pressures which can create lens effects that curve light around large areas, especially if the humidity has a gradient such as above the ocean on a hot day.

I am just suggesting that the size of the earth would imply a very large lense which could curve the light if the lense was large enough to capture it and bounce it over long distances.

Not that it is a globe ... Just that is doesn't exclude either the FE or GE models.

Explain to me how fiber optics works then?