1
StoryTimeHour 1 point ago +1 / -0

Exophthalmos - very uncommon but it does exist

I've only met one person who has this

1
StoryTimeHour 1 point ago +1 / -0

I can go with the controlled opp point, but what is the purpose of using an AI voice? Limit loose ends, test AI voice in the news media, or something more sinister? Doesn't make too much sense to me why they wouldn't just use a real person.

1
StoryTimeHour 1 point ago +1 / -0

he is competing with Biden/Gates/Nye to be the biggest shill on the planet

2
StoryTimeHour 2 points ago +2 / -0

It was a research study and it doesn't look like they open sourced their code

My guess is that they cannot use this on a random person, but rather someone who they have lots of data of what they are typing, the type of keyboard they are using to type, and how exactly it sounds when they are typing it to predict the words.

Microsoft/Apple/Google probably could do something similar, but would have no reason to since they are already able to access what you are typing on their OS.

That being said, if you are interested in machine learning, scikitlearn is a great place to start. The library is easy to use with a ton of functionality, all you need is data to play with (kaggle is a good resource for that). It uses python so it's simple to learn. I would recommend installing Anaconda if you are new to it all in order to get python up and running on your machine.

3
StoryTimeHour 3 points ago +3 / -0

I worked in one of the top 100 global companies for over a decade and did witness something like this. I never saw it from this perspective until reading your post though. Guy I worked with never talked about politics other than just general ethics and morality - seeing both sides of the spectrum. He got fast tracked into upper management and immediately became very liberal. It's always puzzled me but just chocked it up to how intense 2015 was.

3
StoryTimeHour 3 points ago +3 / -0

"It could have been so much worse"

the memes always fit themselves in there

1
StoryTimeHour 1 point ago +2 / -1

I wonder if the post include the full images of the pages or just the sections shown in the thumbnails?

The title of the chapter is:

THE CLINTON BODY COUNT: People Who Conspiracy Theorists Believe Were Killed to Preserve the President's Image and Power

Hiding the context seems to discredit the intentions of the person posting it.