1
Michalusmichalus 1 point ago +1 / -0

You are making nonsense comments. Did YOU read the article, or is it above your reading level?

1
Michalusmichalus 1 point ago +1 / -0

Legacy media has been worthless for years, Reddit shortly after.

by DrLeaks
1
Michalusmichalus 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's sickening.

1
Michalusmichalus 1 point ago +1 / -0

That seems very suspect. Also you're pointing to pre birth, and this study is post birth. More suspect than the climate change causing heart issues.

Considering this was a test specifically to test for what wouldn't be known for years. We will have to wait, and see. I am curious which tests were used from this article though.

1
Michalusmichalus 1 point ago +1 / -0

The data has just started to be looked at. Basically putting prepubescent girls on BC for acne wasn't a good idea, but no-one told them they were the drug trials.

by pkvi
1
Michalusmichalus 1 point ago +1 / -0

I think it's AI. It's more difficult to get to An actual human.

2
Michalusmichalus 2 points ago +3 / -1

I'll never forget axo being repeatedly dragged in the news. But this is more. This is trying to maintain a hold on the news diet.

16
Michalusmichalus 16 points ago +16 / -0

Noob. That happened to the rest of us like 3 years ago.

2
Michalusmichalus 2 points ago +2 / -0

I hope you look at this situation from this perspective as well. You know they like to lockstep.

0
Michalusmichalus 0 points ago +1 / -1

I browse news in my browser. If I used Google news, they'd compile every article on the topic for me...but Google.

1
Michalusmichalus 1 point ago +2 / -1

I was a women that had high risk pregnancies. I understand these laws, the medical terminology, and how the outcome was very easily predictable. The why is what I don't see. Why do this? Why risk mother and child? Why kill the mother for a baby that would never live, or make the women having kids sterile due to complications?

It seems to me to be another way of preventing population growth.

by DrLeaks
1
Michalusmichalus 1 point ago +1 / -0

Everyone needs help from time to time. If that's the way they intend the statement, I agree.

-1
Michalusmichalus -1 points ago +1 / -2

Biology 101

A pregnancy is counted from the first day of the women's last period. (This is why due dates are corrected later in pregnancy after sonograms) That means even if the woman only had sex on day 28 of her cycle, she's automatically 4 weeks pregnant. Now apply 6 week abortion bans to the human biology that the laws ignored. The later corrections are too late for choices to be made.

Next is the, " heartbeat laws" the mothers blood runs through from beginning to end. This leads to situations where there is no heart, but a, " heartbeat" echo is detected in equipment from the mothers heart doing its job. I have also posted a thread where a woman was forced to give birth to cancer. Not even a human being. A clump of cancer cells.

3
Michalusmichalus 3 points ago +3 / -0

If you don't add the link, the video plays on this site, and we can't read the comments on the site the video is on.

2
Michalusmichalus 2 points ago +2 / -0

There's another definition of, " the watchers". People paid to keep the demons out of dead bodies.

Nathaniel J. Gillis a deomonologist gives lots ofbinterveiws.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›