I would never have made that connection.
Yep. You're "micro cucked" if she's not a virgin.
I don't know the biology of how this happens, but I bet.
"....and that wine may cheer the heart of man. That he may make the face cheerful with oil: and that bread may strengthen man's heart." Psalm 104
Gluttony was always sin, but the Bible also tells us that a wine used to promote cheer is acceptable.
You're redefining the word free to suit your own argument.
Even St. Paul says to test the spirits and to retain what's good.
When pentacostals and others babble in tongues...
Because such people break restraints upon them by their nature.
If you have location services enabled on your phone, while not actively using the map app while driving, you get what you deserve.
The exception proves the rule, mon ami. I actually knew you'd come back with that, and let you do it anyway to prove my point. Thanks.
And really, you shouldn't post something that is so easily show how right I am without checking yourself first.
https://www.pewresearch.org/religion/2020/01/22/what-americans-know-about-the-holocaust/
"Most U.S. adults know what the Holocaust was and approximately when it happened, but fewer than half can correctly answer multiple-choice questions about the number of Jews who were murdered.....[only] (45%) know that approximately 6 million Jews were killed in the Holocaust. Nearly three-in-ten Americans say they are not sure how many Jews died during the Holocaust, while one-in-ten overestimate the death toll, and 15% say that 3 million or fewer Jews were killed.
Most who underestimate the number of Jews killed in Holocaust have neutral or warm feelings toward Jews...This raises an important question: Are those who underestimate the death toll simply uninformed, or are they Holocaust deniers –"
Look into the numbers for young people, and it's even greater, that is to say, more denialist.
That is a motte and baily debate tactic you just engaged in. I've taken the outer walls, and now you're defending the inner bailey.
I'm not saying your point in your reply is wrong, but it's not the original one, and thus not the one that should have been made.
The fact that the police don't show up at your home for memes is the 1st Amendment version you're operating under, much less that most of the public thinks the holocaust didn't happen or was greatly exaggerated due to memes people have been sharing since the internet was created, under said system.
Not really, but I'm not going to bother with debating it.
Buying Greenland?
I would sooner eat my hat than believe that there will be a version of the First Amendment that banned Holocaust denialism. Ain't gonna happen.
You can read the 3rd without reading the first two, and Lewis really predicted the future in Hideous Strength.
More like "good choice."
I mean, this is pretty good but the connection to the name Malachai is just wrong.
Anybody named Malachai is named after the minor Old Testament prophet.
Suspension of free speech to you can't criticize the Freemasons? That's beyond retarded.
It would absolutely be a good think if Europe became fascist. Mass deportations all around.
The Jews ran the multiculturalism game in Europe, but the mohammedians hate them, and now they are trying to get control of their golem.
I must have missed it back then. I do remember the Netflix show.
Yep, it's an easy grab at some diversity points.
The food is poisoning us, but it didn't start out that way.
Take the ingredients for a ice cream sandwich in 1960. It's milk, cream, eggs, etc. Then they change one ingredient in the product every couple years for 60 years. Every single small change makes sense, and make the product virtually identical to the product it was 2-3 years prior to the change.
But if you compare an ice cream sandwich from today to one from 1960, it tastes different and had a ton of weird unpronounceable things in it to preserve shelf life and to hide to taste of the weird chemistry items in it.
The result of this process on lots of food is why we are getting poisoned.
I'll stay with the standard definition of things. And even when it restricts their personal freedom? The history of the world says otherwise. All it would take is one Napoleon who wanted his Josephine.
I give you the last word.