Contrastive facts (ie illustrating hypocrisy) used to be the best approach. Lately I'd argue that accelerationism is more effective. Essentially advocate for the most extreme, ridiculous point of view that's morally consistent with their flawed reasoning. For example, obviously white people should not be allowed to own property just as is the case in a South Africa. This will wake people up. You will need to be able to follow it up with an explanation that enables understanding such as "I'm not serious but you need to realize this is consistent with wokeness"
Well we know there is connection between EMF and spraying as it relates to weather modification. There might be a connection between 5g and central contaminants. Atomized dipoles such as graphene would interact with microwaves. My best guess is that the contamination looks similar to the compound found in the jab. Spray a little to justify using the jab then use it to create the contamination that interacts with the 5g. Then it's a selective killswitch basically. I think they're beta testing it in athletes to determine effectiveness.
Nah I highly doubt this. It would give NATO what they want: an excuse due to human rights and treaty violations. More likely a strategic repositioning ahead of Winter. All they have to do is wait after all they have then surrounded on 3 sides.
Do you think there really were planes or not? We've got eye witnesses saying there were gray planes and some saying there were no planes. Then we've got CGI planes. I think the CGI could be an attempt to match the narrative. But, were there actually planes?
Just watched this and it's related https://rumble.com/v1iunqk-larry-silverstein-trump-netanyahu-compilation.html
Thought has crossed my mind... i mean the DNC is the party of the KKK and of slavery after all