I think they pushed it to first week of December. There’s events aligning that week and it’s also when the next debt deadline hits. I think they underestimated how hard and how long it would take to collapse supply lines and to fire everybody. Plus energy price crunches are more effective when it’s cold.
Not advice but it sure seems like to me that: They can’t prove that your choice causes limitations to your ability to perform your duties. The contact you signed more than likely never included language about compulsory treatments. Their illegal threat has clearly caused you harm in the form of pain and suffering as a result of anxiety. They must cease and desist.
I think we have to focus macro to get predictive due to complexity. Case study: lumber prices. They shot up and collapsed due to transit issues. At the time all the excuses were noise: first fires, climate change, trump tariffs, etc. it only matters if quantity demanded marches supply and if it doesn’t then either price or timelines have to change. Both occurred: increased delays and 4-6x prices. Long term the scarcity effect takes over and causes reduction in velocity and then deflation.
Inflation needs to happen first before deflation can take over. This is because there’s too much momentum. Look at weimer. We’re actually in hyper inflation right now imo. They are desperately using lockdowns and supply bottlenecks to prevent price discovery from occurring.
Deflation has to win longterm too many forces pushing on it:
- demographics
- technology
- globalization
- service orientation
There is a picture supposedly taken of something vaguely familiar to hydra vulgaris. You think they try to reproduce these findings. Hard to say it’s legitimate without independent confirmation. They don’t really offer any evidence for their claims. I think this is concerning since these claims are fairly extraordinary.
Sure would be inconvenient for them if someone pointed out the large swathes of students violating the student code of ethics as it relates to drugs and alcohol. This inconsistency in approach could open them up to misconduct and religious discrimination concerns.
Commission is not about redistribution. That’s like saying capitalism is about money. It’s not false it’s just not full context.
Communism is about power dynamics: using the week to crush the strong so that their power and wealth can be repurposed. Any redistribution that occurs to the poor is only nominal and will be reminded one it is no longer necessary.
Prior odds are rarely used when inconvenient