▲ 3 ▼
KiloRomeo 3 points ago +3 / -0

Woah more potent vaccines based upon social credit score 🤯

▲ 2 ▼
KiloRomeo 2 points ago +2 / -0

The globalist almost all have Nazi connections. Dutch and Norwegian royalty, WEF, etc. Soros literally a former Nazi is funding antifa literally brownshirts. The fourth reich is global and they’re engaging in jab driven genocide

by pkvi
▲ 2 ▼
KiloRomeo 2 points ago +2 / -0

Trudeau go back to theater your arguments have no evidence

▲ 2 ▼
KiloRomeo 2 points ago +2 / -0

Agreed. Regulatory capture causes monopolies

▲ 2 ▼
KiloRomeo 2 points ago +2 / -0

No they’re like “I’ve been thinking ____ for a while now and this confirms it”. 🤷‍♂️ Maybe that’s an approach to treating cognitive dissonance: “deep down inside you knew all along that _____”

by pkvi
▲ 5 ▼
KiloRomeo 5 points ago +5 / -0

My understanding: The s proteins are known to concentrate in sexual organs. Transmission risk would be more for females (or the receiver). Female risk of transmission is to the child.

by pkvi
▲ 7 ▼
KiloRomeo 7 points ago +7 / -0

Cope harder msm

▲ 10 ▼
KiloRomeo 10 points ago +10 / -0

I have normie friends who are finally waking up

▲ 3 ▼
KiloRomeo 3 points ago +3 / -0

Having a virus is not the same as being sick. Almost all of the symptoms you experience when “sick with a virus” are caused by your immune response. Your body can form this same immune regime to other antigens, allergens, foreign bodies, or even yourself. Thus the sickness is not transmissible but the cause can be transmitted.

▲ 7 ▼
KiloRomeo 7 points ago +7 / -0

I agree with the the general sentiment here but want to point out that live views is not the same as total views. Not apples to apples. But, the age of podcast is here finally

▲ 1 ▼
KiloRomeo 1 point ago +1 / -0

TBF MILF means they’re capable which is something that could take years to determine

▲ 2 ▼
KiloRomeo 2 points ago +2 / -0
  • What about malaria?
  • any connection to blood drives?
▲ 3 ▼
KiloRomeo 3 points ago +3 / -0
  1. PCR tests (already covered below)
  2. Efficacy of vaccines (not yet addressed below)
  3. Efficacy of early treatment (already covered below)
  4. Classification of “with covid” vs “of covid” by hospitals on death certificates
  5. Virus genome classification esp. Omicron
▲ 3 ▼
KiloRomeo 3 points ago +3 / -0

The all cause mortality is about 0.87%. So even a 100% increase here places this below 2%. Even so this makes the vaccine more deadly than all the world wars combined. How severe does it need to be in order to be concerning?

▲ 2 ▼
KiloRomeo 2 points ago +2 / -0

A 40% increase in 0.87% brings 2.8MM up to around 4.0MM a year. A hugely significant increase but far from an instantaneous culling. Will probably take 20-30 years to get where they want the population (50-60% reduction). I think the mass migration caravans are covering up the holes left by this increase.

▲ 2 ▼
KiloRomeo 2 points ago +2 / -0

Wow the guy suffers from serious cognitive dissonance. He blames it all on covid, is planning to require the vax, and will raise premiums in low vax employers. But the data is saying it’s caused by non-covid disabilities…. Glad i don’t invest in his company.

▲ 2 ▼
KiloRomeo 2 points ago +2 / -0

7/28/21 was when mRNA was 333.33. Any happenings?

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›