You need something liquid. PMs are good because they have a lot of uses, preserve easily, and are light weight. There's been a number of commodity backed currencies in the past too. For instance, whisky, corn, tobacco banks
I sort of disagree in the sense that barter works better in 1:1 or micro groups (granted) but it doesn't work that well in low to medium complexity groups where, for example, my ability to do XYZ depends upon the seasons and I meed a store of value to trade later.
I rememeber analyzing it with basically 0% chance that it wasn't fraudulent and rebuttled the anti beneford shills but honestly they don't care at all about data they only care about force and... they have it, at least for now
Well, for example, we know that Jupiter/Io have a relationship that causes Jupiter to spit out a bunch of EMF with a periodicity that exactly matches the orbital dynamics if this iron core moon. Sun is a bit more collocated because of its size, the distances, and its Corona. I'm totally speculating here but perhaps changes to Corona occur from planets (known phenomenon) can also in turn cause a change to sunspots.
There's only 6 files but supposedly 181 participants for site 1006. Hence OP claim of 97% data made up or missing.
- Red line shows bottoms of sort order for 5/2 for site 1006 and there's only 6 on top
- other images reference participants with a site ID of 20, 50, ... , or even 181 thus expressing the number of supposed participants.
What the OP is saying is that they always 1 file per patient per week per site. So, we should expect 181 files for May 2nd for site 1006 if, within their data, they claim to have 181 patients in the trial. Instead, they have just 6 which is a 97% reduction.
It's actually the most demanded industrial metal if price drops to ~4x copper