I thought you were referencing mccarthy. I'm not sure i have the same inference here but i could be wrong. My pov regarding this time period is the the MIC took over and never really let go it just got institutionalized as a part of the bureaucratic state
This will be a controversial point of view but i think they should first design a system for determining if some should stay and be granted work visas. I think many are likely hard working and earnestly seeking a better life. We'd be better off creating a clearer path to being a productive citizen. The criminals and those who are here for the hand out should be returned home.
Meta posts like these seem to occur any time the community successfully identifies an antagonist whose sole purpose is to destroy the community. Take from this what you will not this is the second time I've come to this conclusion now related to the same set of users.
"Democracy" is just code for globalist encasement of free states
They also spy on all your notes and files and use the mic to data mine conversations. The "oh it's in the ToS" is a cowardly argument that is admission they're using lawfare against citizens while destroying their civil liberties. The net result is a drag net that steals your ideas faster than you can type them.
This community is full of compromised spammers but also with extreme skeptics. It can be hard to tell the difference sometimes and i think that speaks to the most recent tactic. It's no longer fight the person or the community but attempt to discredit the method of discovery and to sow doubt around every corner to reduce the value and impact
Some people have so succumb to denial that they require extraordinary proof. Even if Pfizer admitted it, I suspect they'd deny its role in any side effects or argue that it wasn't in every jab so it's irrelevant etc
Well so then my feedback would be that they have shown it could be GO but not that it is GO. Additional evidence comes from the dozens of peer reviewed articles admitting they're exploiting GO to replace or augment LNPs. For some this is enough, for a skeptic they'll require more proof. Even if they admitted they were doing it some people would still refuse to believe it or would begin downplaying the safety concern. Denial can be dogmatic
There were definitely lipid nano particles used to infiltrate cells. The most mainstream, seminal research admits this because mRNA requires it for both infiltration and replication. These LNPs are expensive, fragile and need to be temperature controlled. Why wouldn't they try to improve upon this as part of a normal R&D effort? The conspiracy comes in when they were using the cover of immunity to perform their own toxicity studies on a batch basis to determine how to use GO vs LNPs. Bonus points: bad batches tended to target political enemies.
He'll probably refuse foreign aid if they don't take back their citizens (carrot) or threaten tariffs (stick).