▲ 2 ▼
guywholikesDjtof2024 2 points ago +2 / -0

The priest-craft

What?

of the various religions spiritually enslave people, keeping them from experiencing higher reality.

Thanks for describing what non-Christian worldviews do. One particular one, athiesm, does this a bunch.

Spiritual growth isn't about a belief in whether this or that historically happened,

However there is a historical aspect.

It is about growing in Christ and reflecting on His Words.

but about

It's about having a Relationship with God.

the Inner Light within us.

When a person is born it (if it exists) should be spread throughout the body.

It is beyond the comprehension of those accustomed to basing their morality on what God allegedly said according to a book that there is no right and wrong in life, and everything is a learning opportunity.

Run on sentence. Rephrase this, please.

▲ 2 ▼
guywholikesDjtof2024 2 points ago +2 / -0

AI = Always Inmates

GDP = Globalist-Dominated Prisons

▲ 2 ▼
guywholikesDjtof2024 2 points ago +2 / -0

Thankfully, they're starting to (bad thing) repent to Jesus en masse. Fixed.

▲ 2 ▼
guywholikesDjtof2024 2 points ago +2 / -0

were staged

Meaning what? If so, there's nothing to show that.

elevated

By their own selves and the left.

▲ 2 ▼
guywholikesDjtof2024 2 points ago +2 / -0

how nobody talks about

Because no one cares. Who cares about Rooling? The only person going on about her here most recently is you. What a small, small hill to die on.

▲ 4 ▼
guywholikesDjtof2024 4 points ago +4 / -0

I notice a massive lack of Erika criticsm. "I LOVE WOMEN NOW!!!"

▲ 3 ▼
guywholikesDjtof2024 3 points ago +3 / -0

came back

Because he wasn't ruling anymore. Thanks for admitting commie dictatorships banned the TRUTH.

▲ 2 ▼
guywholikesDjtof2024 2 points ago +2 / -0

Getting married to a person who lives an anti-Biblical lifestyle and believes an unBiblical worldviews will do that to you, yeah.

▲ 2 ▼
guywholikesDjtof2024 2 points ago +2 / -0

The whole leftist platform is team Epstien island.

▲ 2 ▼
guywholikesDjtof2024 2 points ago +2 / -0

nothing but Christc#ck culture warriors.

How so?

Then Vance goes on a rant telling the rest of the world to be natalist or die.

Strawman?

▲ 3 ▼
guywholikesDjtof2024 3 points ago +3 / -0

So you happily admit the Leftist adjacency similarities. Okie.

▲ 2 ▼
guywholikesDjtof2024 2 points ago +2 / -0

Dumb. Leftists are anti-family. Leftists are also athiests. You are. Therefore you are closer to a leftist.

▲ 1 ▼
guywholikesDjtof2024 1 point ago +1 / -0

Also post this on Videy.co , not a fan of bit chute.

▲ 2 ▼
guywholikesDjtof2024 2 points ago +2 / -0

The crossover between you and feminism is claiming that "Marrige Bad!!"

▲ 1 ▼
guywholikesDjtof2024 1 point ago +1 / -0

it doesn't [cites multiculturalism article]

Show me where blacks are being to taught en masse to love whites and consider them as brothers.

Because killing white people is the point.

Correct.

▲ 2 ▼
guywholikesDjtof2024 2 points ago +2 / -0

wants us to think we love each other

Blatantly false. Why do you think all this division propaganda exists and the left is radicalized to hate their opponents? Why do you think russia and Ukraine areN'T being told to love each other?

What did Jesus say were the 2 greatest Commands?

And John 3:16

I wish whatever term you used is as based as you seem to believe it is.

▲ 2 ▼
guywholikesDjtof2024 2 points ago +2 / -0

Wrong versus right implies keeping within a circle,

False. It implies a true line and a false line colliding until there is none of the false line and only the true line remains. It's more linear than whatever weird worldview you have.

while ignoring line given.

See above

...taking given

You don't even need to take anything, Someone can just drop something on your patio as a gift, and you don't need to do anything to have it.

thereby shaping a contradiction in-between taking rightfully vs wrongfully.

That's a good thing if that were true. If you take something, you only do one or the other.

One knows...you is based on me, hence an understanding (standing under one another).

It's I AM (Jesus) who defines what YOU ARE (judah).

So are you a Christian? And don't do any "THIS IMPLIES THAT" stupidity with this question.

a) Giving implies IM-pression, being given implies EX-pression aka impression (inception towards death) gives expression (life).

Nope. The giver exists. "REEEEE GIVING THINGS TO PEOPLE KILLS THEM!!!!!" Nope. "Inception towards death" doesn't exist. Nobody but you believe in such a concept. It's a fairytale you made up. "OH LOOK HE SAID "MADE UP" LEMME CLAIM THAT MEANS SOMETHING ELSE!! MUH PRECIOUS WORD MAGIC SO GREATE!!!!1!1!1!"

Taking represses expression or as Madonna put it: "Express yourself; don't repress yourself; and I'm not sorry; it's human nature".

HAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAAHA you base WORLDVIEW BELIEFS on SONGS??!!? Even more reason your wordgame-based worldview is unsustainable. "Basing implies [WHATEVER I SAY HERE]" in 3, 2,.... (Yes you're that predictable.)

b) Putting THE before GIVER contradicts the first commandment.

"REEEEEEE MY IDEOLOGICAL OPPONENT PUT CERTAIN WORDS IN CERTAIN POSITIONS!!! THIS MEANS SOMETHING!!!! WORDS ARE MAGICAL AND IF YU SAY THEM IN A CERTAIN ORDER THEY DO A MAGIC THING!!!! BUT BAD WORD POSITION MEANS BAD MAGIC!!1!11! REEEEEE!!!"

If implies then (linear progression)

If your worldview is false, then you should reject it. If you stop word games and be normal, then lots of good will come your way. Linear progression!!

true implies versus false (circular conflict)

Arbitrary. It could be shaped an octagonal prism for all I care. Doesn't have any bearing on anything. >"The words "shaped" and "bearing" do/imply something!!11!1" in 3, 2,...

that's how ones trust in either true or false side was banked inwardly (logic) and outwardly (reason) within a confining circle.

Wrong. There is no circle for trust to be in. You think trust is a physical thing, don't you. Like how athiests believe all is matter. Show me this imagined "circle". Your claims about circles are unfounded and not true.

Nature doesn't give true or false options to bind self

Because it allows other things to give them. And it's not sentient, so how could it care? DUH.

...nature gives free will of choice.

Wait, you're not the source of FWOC????

True and false are optional

INCORRECT. Every day we live as if they are integrated into all reality and concretely true. Optional, no.

to what primary gives.

"Primary" can't and doesn't give anything because it's not a noun. You messed up. Try a different word. Mabye you meant "optional to what pretzel gives". "Meant implies or does something!! Look he said the word meant! So special and magical!! Woooowwww!!" in 3, 2,....

▲ 2 ▼
guywholikesDjtof2024 2 points ago +2 / -0

The entirety of my comments are true.

cannot be free by claiming a worldview

What a stupid claim. By your logic, a kid isn't free to choose which blocks to put in which holes just because..... HE PUT A SQUARE BLOCK IN A SQUARE HOLE.

claiming contradicts seeing

Mud pool reef. Fish contradicts u/free-will-of-choice.

Claiming does NOT contradict seeing.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›