Personally, I think the megalithic structures of the world are explainable through the idea that within humanity exists a (almost entirely forgotten) biological technology, as I try to evidence on c/HumanPotential
However - that does not in any way rule out any of the various “ancient alien” or “spiritual development ‘battleground’” theories which have their own strengths and weaknesses. I lean towards some version of the Law of One ideas, which, like you’re saying, posit non-human influences on our development.
Im wondering if were not at the end of not only one 80 year cycle, but also a macro cycle of 12,000 years?
When you get a chance, I highly recommend that audiobook posted to c/NonDuality , it makes a very convincing case that we are basically at the very start of the “upswing”, after we’ve been (for the last 12,000 years) on the “downswing”.
>it is darkest just before the dawn
The Vedic data fits very well with the ideas presented by Graham Hancock, Randall Carlson, et al :
[Why is there NO evidence of ancient humans?] https://youtu.be/F-d4zfovcog
Spot on, on all fronts.
Just as a day is made of 24 cycles of 60 minutes, and each of those minutes composed of 60 seconds, so too is a month made of 28 days and a year comprised of 12 months.
The same thing occurs with the cycles that govern our existence. Just as each autumn brings a harvest the Great Autumn brings the Great Harvest.
Just as one man lives his life in 72 years, does one “Great Day” pass in the calendar of the “Great Year”
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Year
https://communities.win/c/NonDuality/p/141YWfcoKm/the-holy-science--sri-yukteswar-/c
https://communities.win/c/ConsumeProduct/p/15JnU6ECjg/the-most-ancient-had-a-level-of-/c
That’s another ultra-interesting rabbit hole:
(Same guy) https://communities.win/c/Conspiracies/p/15IrKsMZoT/whoever-built-the-great-pyramid-/c
How the fuck could an illiterate make grand and majestic insights into classical literature - much less ones that would stand for a thousand years and continue to reverberate every time some schmuck like you says “we’re in a pickle”
https://www.rsc.org.uk/shakespeare/language/biblical-and-classical-references
No illiterate could have such deep and intricate knowledge of court politics, or history, or the classics that came before, or any of the other subjects so brilliantly touched upon by “Shake-Speare”.
Comforting notion though.
Some more info on this theory here:
https://sirbacon.org/baconian-evidence-for-shakespeare-authorship/
I lean towards this being true. Also very interesting is the potential role he played in the KJV Bible as the head of the “Divines” who translated it.
Yeah they started banning them back when r/conspiracy moved over and some of us posted it there. I’ve never tried their other domains though, like scored.co
Hah! You should post this on feggit with a slightly more naive title and a link here
ApRiL fOoLs hAhAhAhAhahAh
I’m right there with ya, started my journey a little later, with Graham Hancock largely before branching out into more esoteric subjects, under the thought process of “if history has been a lie I wonder where else that’s the case”....
Kind of amazed an awakening is actually happening, but there's a long way to go yet, huh?
How long is it that the Indian/Aryan system uses for their “transitional ages” between true yugas? Something like 254 years I believe? I’m quite convinced we are living through this transition through the ages right now, whether one wants to think of that in terms of Yugas, Great Ages (Pisces, Aquarius, etc), or another framework. I think that the great labor of our time will be discovering, or more accurately rediscovering, the core Truths expressed across all these systems
I agree, especially given how nicely that data dovetails with the Orion’s Belt alignment of the 3 pyramids just north
Do you know a user who goes by u/gayslop ?
I linked to one of the few people to ever publish a paper on the matter, and who literally brought the theory to people’s attention with John Anthony West starting in the 90s. He admits his dating is the minimum age based on the water erosion, and acknowledges the strength of the other arguments, such as Leo alignment placing it at 10,500 or even one cycle earlier at 36,500 years ago.
The key word was “minimum”
https://www.robertschoch.com/sphinx.html
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/African_humid_period
7,000-10,000 actually
What is the minimum age of the Sphinx? If you can produce the correct answer, I will humor you further.
The cyclical reset of planet earth every “Cosmic” Year / 26,000 earth years, which obliterates and restarts human civilization, and which the megalithic structures of the world are clearly a warning about:
2nd video doesn’t “nullify” anything, Wally just renamed black holes to plasmoids. Those guys are ok though, if a bit lacking in predictive power.
It very elegantly explains their fine tuning - selection towards complexity as an analogue of biological fecundity. How do you figure it doesn’t?
edit4youredit - what needs explaining isn’t the simple presence of “constants”, what demands an explanation is why these constants, which could have taken literally any values, have the values that result in a universe that doesn’t instantly decompose but instead persists for billions of years creating progressively more complexity... seriously...read the link/watch the video and quit yapping in ignorance
There’s also no direct photographing (oh look, an unfalsifiable hypothesis.)
There’s no pictures of protons either genius, are they fake too?
no direct documentation of mass bodies actually vectoring directly towards and merging in the center of one of those “holes”.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_hole_information_paradox
Also, the whole quasar phenomenon observed at the center or galaxies and suspected black holes immediately nullifies their hypothesis.
Oh, does it? I eagerly await your sharing of your research on the matter.
The evidence for black holes is overwhelming.
The theory provides an explanation for how a chain of descendant universes (each resulting from a previous black hole) would “select for” (akin to natural selection) universes which contain complexity - and thus the potential for more “offspring” from that universe.
Just watch the video lol
https://www.britannica.com/science/anthropic-principle
Give that a perusal to see where this post is coming from
Hey, thanks for the kind words! I took a little break from this site, came back a few weeks ago but have been forgetting to cross-post things here if I post them to other .wins too...
You might be interested in a video I posted a few days ago - about The Science Delusion which has seeped into the minds of most “educated” people:
https://communities.win/c/ConsumeProduct/p/15JndY76YK/banned-ted-talk--the-science-del/c
If you enjoy that at all feel free to post it here!
Cheers!