true and false implies conflict of reason
a) AND implies the temptation to choose a side within a conflict of reason (true vs false).
b) True vs false implies want vs not want, while ignoring need aka needing to resist wanted temptation.
c) Nature neither supplies true nor false information...is supplies inspiration by change.
Being implies within (in) spirit (spir) of action (ation)...reasoning tempts one to ignore that.
that statement is true
Stance (state) of mind (ment) implies within motion, hence being enabled to respond to input...true or false implies holding onto what others tempted (suggestion) one to put (consent) into mind.
You believe that you are correct
To believe implies choosing to hold onto a suggestion by another, while ignoring that nature moves, and therefore cannot be held onto.
Using implication (if/then) over reason (correct vs incorrect) allows one to notice for example...in (within) cor (heart) rect/reg (to move in a straight line), hence life being moved from inception towards death.
Reasoning conflicts are circular" IMPLIES THAT YOU ARE ALREADY THINKING IN CIRCLES
Implication derives from motion...a circle implies a shape within motion. Holding onto shapes tempts one to ignore being (life) moved (inception towards death).
Holding onto implies by ones free will of choice...letting go implies nature forcing adaptation from being. Try holding your breath for a while until nature forces you to let go.
word analysises
Words imply a synthesis between suggested word and consenting letter aka ones choice LETTING a chosen one shape words by suggestion. This represents spell-craft.
Being implies apart from one another aka analysis (life) during thesis (inception towards death).
rebut and defend
a) Using implication (if/then) prevents ones free will of choice from entering a conflict of reason (vs).
b) Only withing balance (inception/death) can there be (life) choice...conflict implies imbalance for choice; no matter which sides ones chooses.
c) Confirm vs rebut and attack vs defend tempt both sides to consent to versus/verto - "to turn", hence turning against one another.
you choose to tinker with words like a child first knowing abt language.
Only within sound can words be shaped. Few trick many with definitions to become DEAF PHONETICIANS aka deaf to phonics (sound).
Nature doesn't shape words...it moves instruments apart from one another within sound. Instruments implies "minds structured within" and sound/sanus implies "entire; whole; all"
Sound allows knowledge...words tempt understanding aka standing-under those who suggest the meaning of words.
you believe things to be true that make it so that you never face the fact that your beliefs are not correct.
a) Belief vs disbelief aka true vs false aka me vs you aka fact vs fiction aka correct vs incorrect...choosing either side binds ones free will of choice.
b) No/not/nothing is based on creatio ex nihilo... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creatio_ex_nihilo and represents suggested nihil-ism (nihilo; nothing) tempting ones de-nial of perceivable for suggested.
Nothing isn't in conflict with everything...it's each things free will of choice to deny everything perceivable when consenting to suggested "nothing"... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EQnaRtNMGMI
Yes, a scam.
Yes vs no cheats oneself out of balance.
Your worldview is not
a) Mine vs yours tempts one to ignore that potential (life) during procession (inception towards death) cannot take into possession without destroying each other.
b) Nature WAS perceivable before each being within can suggest what it IS.
c) Not (nothing) implies the inversion of nature (everything).
intellectual growth
Only during loss (inception towards death) can there be growth (life)...intellect/intelligo - "to understand" implies standing under one another, which suppresses growth.
Sleight of hand by Madonna: "express yourself; don't repress yourself...and I'm not sorry...it's human nature"
constant denial
CON implies "together"...DE implies "divided; apart".
Freewill of choice: "My word analyses are true because they are true"
a) Free + will have to separated from one another; otherwise one couldn't be free from one another.
b) MY and TRUE tempt free will of choice to claim for self (my) while holding onto a side (true)...both of which bind free will of choice to others (you + false).
c) Analyzing the synthesis of words allows one to perceive the thesis of moving sound.
I can't give you anything though
All (perceivable) was given to each one (perception)...giving and taking each others suggestions tempts one to ignore that.
Only nature gives (inception) and takes (death) from being (life).
I criticize you
Critic/krinein - "to separate"...https://www.etymonline.com/word/critic hence every ONE being a critic to ONE another.
If one chooses to claim self as "me; myself or I", then every other one becomes a YOU (phonetic jew).
How? Why? Don't use implications.
Do vs don't implies a artificial conflict of reason, which tempts one to ignore natural implication (if/then). There's no conflict within implication.
As for why? If many ignore natural for artificial; then few can shape artificial within natural to control many.
Don't break words apart.
Nature "breaks" beings apart from one another...artificial words tempt many together under the crafted spells by few.
one famous writer, Moorcock
More cock...
fantasy archetypes
Reality moves...holding onto anything shapes fantasy, while building arches among types.
a dark side of the human condition
Being implies in-between light (discernment) and dark (ignorance)...suggestion tempts ignorance of perception.
victimistic world view.
That view within self represents circular logic, which outwards turns against others as conflicts of reason (perpetrator vs victim)...hence victim/vicis - "to turn".
I've been living on the edge so long
Perceivable knowledge
Where the winds of limbo roar
Free will of choice...center of perceivable balance, while being tempted with the roar of suggested sides from every direction.
And I'm young enough to look at
For each look/lock represents a fresh choice.
And far too old to see
For sight to see was always there.
All the scars are on the inside
For being implies....one (life) within sides (inception/death) of all aka a scar/sker - "to cut".
I'm not sure if there's anything left of me
Potential (life) during procession (inception towards death) cannot take self (me) into possession; nor hold onto what others assure one can own.
Don't let these shakes go on
Aka choice within balance being shaken by the suggested choices of others into imbalance...if consented to.
I can't say if we're ever gonna be free
Cause saying binds free will of choice to words held within moving sound.
israel attacked...if Iran defends then US retaliates.
Shlomo: "If I switch "defend" and "retaliate", then the goyim will ignore "attack".
Everything you've just said is circular logic.
a) Everything was perceivable before one can suggest what it is. In this case...sound was before one can logistically think about words shaped within.
b) Logic (circular thinking) is based on ones consent to suggested logos (words shaped within sound).
Your ideas kill their own selves.
a) Others suggest ideal-ism which tempts one to consent to idolatry...doing that implies self destruction, not being killed by others.
b) The suggested words "me; myself or I" tempt one to claim self possession, while ignoring that potential (life) during procession (inception towards death) cannot be held onto.
One cannot own anything...it requires mass ignorance thereof to permit few to "own" everything many are ignoring.
c) Intercourse for off-spring implies "self" being perpetuated through one another.
Have some self r3fl3cti0n, bro.
Re (to respond) flect (to bend) ion (action)...action (inception towards death) bends reactions (life) by separating each one from one another.
Few trick many to self reflect by "remembrance" aka by recollecting suggested information held within memory, which is how circular logic contains the one thinking within his "own" mind/memory.
Perceivable inspiration cannot be held onto, only drawn from on the fly. Memory is necessary for adaptation, while tempting storage aka owning aka taking into possession, while one needs to resist to be able to adapt.
Wrong. WRONG.
Wrong/wer - "to turn"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/wrong hence turning into a conflict of reason (wrong vs right).
You had "it" already.
a) Generation implies motion (male) through momentum (female) into matter (transformed offspring)...suggested "it" tempts one to ignore the implied division of gender aka s(plit)he + wo(mb)man + fe(minine)male.
b) YOU is based upon one taking possession over self as I, while ignoring one aka each naturally designated unit/unitas/unus - "one".
There can be only one.
The only thing
Thing implies a division of everything (whole) into each thing (partial) aka oneness dividing into ones, hence "one and only".
word games
Game/gamble implies taking CHANCE, while giving up CHOICE. Why would free-will-of-choice play such a game?
Free-will-of-choice describes the implication of sound by separating words to make it harder for others to bind themselves by holding onto them.
YOUR "procession
Procession (inception towards death) was before potential (life) comes into being...potential reasoning (me vs you) against one another implies a dis (to divide) tort (to twist) ion (action).
Sleight of hand for distortion (twist) and reason (shout)... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7VhlSmPNsDA
Notice that Ferris/ferry/fare (to carry; pass over) doesn't utter words...he just pretends to, while remaining within the sound of silence.
align with my beliefs
Beliefs are based on circular logic turning into a conflict of reason (belief vs disbelief)...both sides tempt one to ignore being (life) within align aka a line (inception towards death).
Notice furthermore that "my" implies taking possession...doing that within a line distorts procession.
cowboy; samurai; pirate
Notice that these are easily impersonated by costumes. Just put on some recognizable fashion and paraphernalia, and you're good to slap a mainstream culture onto whatever history requires a kosher do-over aka cover-up aka revisionism.
Just like slapping some scaffolding onto already established buildings, while pretending to erect them for the future yet to be written.
It's all about establishing a distance between suggested past and suggested future, to distort the presence within the mind/memory of others.
ancient
Anc-IENT distracts from sent-IENT...one cannot have sentience before (ancient) or after (modern) being (current).
w/o reasoning
Reasoning implies conflicting sides. Reason tempts one to choose one or the other side, while ignoring ones "sight".
more sense
More vs less implies reasoning about "sense", while ignoring...being (life) send (inception towards death), which gives sentience to being, while sentencing life from inception towards point of death.
liberal
Aka free (liber) within all (al)...which one ignores when binding self to suggested liberal-ism.
anarchy is not profitable
Profitable implies "able to set (fit) forth (pro)", hence perception within perceivable being able to set forth suggested.
Anarchy aka "absence of government" implies ones mind controlled by suggestions sets forth by others, which puts ones mind absentia aka away (ab) from sentience; being (sentia).
for both sides is provoking surveillance legislation
a) Nature doesn't VEIL anything...it offers everything (perceivable) to each thing (perception). Ones consent to suggested puts the veil over self.
b) Surveillance implies "oversight", which is based on ones "understanding" of what others are suggesting. If one consents to suggested, then others are permitted to surveil one through the suggested.
it saved more lives than it took
Only nature judges...any artificial justification shaped within tempts one to ignore nature.
Deep state head
Aka each ones deep (ignorance) or elevated (discernment) state of mind.
That's why cutting the head of a hydra/hydor (water) endlessly respawns (inception towards death) more temporary heads (life).
Black Pope
"And call no man your father upon the earth: for one is your Father, which is in heaven." ~Matthew 23:9
Hence a black (ignorance) and white (discernment) pope/papa (father).
still alive
Living implies agitation of matter within motion...not stillness. Suggestion "instills" ignorance if one chooses to hold onto the suggested.
genius...who seems untouchable.
Genius/gens - "generative power"; from gene - "give birth, bege"....those generated (life) cannot hold onto generation (inception towards death), because potential cannot possess procession during motion.
Touchable implies matter enabled by motion to touch each other.
how to psychically connect to
Psychic aka animating power implies disconnection; separation; division of animation (inception towards death) into animated (life).
controlling the leaders
Followers are being mislead by others suggesting to be leaders. In reality...nature moves each life from inception towards death, so following anything implies suicide. That's why followers cannot fathom what controls leaders.
break up families
Nature breaks up beings, which allows intercourse for further off-spring.
Familiar; noun - "demon, evil spirit that answers one's call" implies seeking artificial answers from one another, while ignoring that nature breaks up beings from one another.
forbidden to speak
Bidding implies "asking"...hence conjuring a familiar answering one's call when articulating words within natural sound.
Allegedly...israelis are also at his backdoor.
jews always will have their own, opposite to what people try to build.
a) To build a garden implies working with nature, while drawing insects. Thinking that one can "own" draws gentiles in opposition to one another, while being exploited by a jew.
b) To build implies "towards being", hence build/bheue - "to be"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/build
Only nature towards (inception towards death) being (life)...a jew tempts gentiles to build towards outcomes, while ignoring origin, which is why anything build collapses into its foundation over and over again (tower of babel).
You can't build more or less optimal socium with jews in it.
SOC implies "together", being implies apart from one another. A jew tempts gentiles together within societies, which in return permits each jew to remain apart...https://www.amazon.com/People-Apart-Europe-1789-1939-History/dp/0198219806
jews always will be antisocial
WILL BE implies each beings free will of choice...separated from one another, hence FREE from one another to WILL.
It's "social" which tempts many together, which tempting choice into a pro vs anti imbalance.
Being implies partial...not social. Each jew knows that, while tempting gentiles to collectively ignore it.
like the devil
Devil implies division (de) buying/selling (vile/wes)... https://www.etymonline.com/word/vile#etymonline_v_7787
Nature divides each being from one another...buying (consent) and selling (suggestion) tempts beings together, hence making differences alike.
euphoria
Euphoria implies eu/es (to be; essence of being) + phoria/bher (to carry)...nature releases each being as free will of choice; while choosing to carry suggested burdens represents sin.
A jew furthermore utilizes euphemism to tempt gentiles into euphoria, hence corrupting phori (to carry) with phēmē (speech; voice; utterance)...nature moves sound through each being; suggested words tempt each being to hold onto definitions, hence becoming DEAF PHONETICIANS.
The jews hinder the Gentiles from salvation
a) Suggested pluralism (jews; gentiles) tempts one to ignore singularity, hence gentiles collectively permitting each chosen one power (sovereign) over the collective (commonwealth).
b) Action (tion) cannot be saved (salva)...reactions can be tricked to ignore perceivable, while holding onto suggested.
A jew tempts gentiles to "save" suggested information within mind/memory, while ignoring that all perceivable moves each ones perception apart from one another.
c) Holding onto suggested HINDERS ones perception to draw from perceivable.
jews have a lot of money, a lot of wealth, a lot of power
a) Gentiles represent the lot (share) a jew casts together with suggested money.
b) The lot of gentiles ignore wealth when choosing suggested currency over perceivable current.
c) Gentiles supplying a lot of power to each jew implies democracy aka dēmos (common people) + kratos (strength).
They use all of this to poison the world
Gentiles willingly ignore what ALL perceivable was, when consenting to what a chosen one suggests ALL is.
One of the reasons I'm anti...
Reasoning implies one against one another, hence pro vs anti....an artificial conflict; permitting each jew control over both sides of every war gentiles are fighting each other over.
I'm not a Nazi.
Within all...each one implies foreign to one another and native/nati/nazi to origin.
I distance myself from Nazism.
a) Ignoring perceivable for suggested...distances native from origin, while permitting foreigners access to one.
b) MY contradicts distance, since it implies a taking into possession and holding onto "myself", which establishes a conflict with "yourself".
A jew suggests -isms to tempt gentiles into taking possession; as to establish conflicts among gentiles called "reason".
Here's a breakdown
It isn't...it's the users consent coming together with suggested information by artificial intelligence.
Doing that tempts one to ignore that nature breaks down all perceivable into each ones perception...which suggestion inverts.
A fake advertisement for a fake product.
It's turning ones mind towards (ad-vertise-ment) suggested products, which tempts one to ignore that ones perception was produced by perceivable reality.
Turning towards (ad-vert) fakes ones response to all (re-al).
tdf
Little did a jew know that a foreskin can do this effortlessly.
Resist and persist
Resistance to suggested information implies persistence within perceivable inspiration....the former tempts one to hold onto; while the latter moves through one and cannot be held onto.
organization
Organ/organon/wergano - "implement; that with which one works"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/organ
A jew utilizes suggested information as an implement aka a supplementary payment within the consenting gentiles mind...which is how artificial organization works, while the natural organ implies each ones perception within all perceivable, while being moved apart from one another.
books
For whom do the generals work?
Few suggest "general" to tempt many to sub-ordinate (ordering under) gener-al (generating all) instead of each one re-generating self by resisting all temptation.
Work implies energy (internal/inherent power) aka each one inheriting all...unless ignored for one another.
That is the question
QUEST (towards outcome) tempts one to ignore ION (enacting origin).
Many on their quests forwards to seek answers from one another are thereby subordinating to the generating all; which permits few to control military...
Militant/militare - "seeking political change by use or advocacy of direct action"...seeking refers to the answers of questions, while advocating direct action implies each one being (life) directed (inception towards death) within the generating all.
transhumanism
Consenting to a suggested -ism contradicts transfer aka to carry (ferre) across (trans), since the one consenting is holding onto the suggested.
a) Schizo/schism (division) + phrenia/phreno (mind) implies the status quo of each ones perception within all perceivable. It's many consenting to suggestions by few which establishes an artificial hivemind aka collective consciousness.
b) To distract from the above...the jew Eugene Bleuler (coined schizophrenia; schizoid;autism;depth psychology) and the jew Sigismund Schlomo Freud (founder of psychoanalysis) have conspired together to "conquer psychiatry"... https://www.amazon.de/Sigmund-Freud-zuversichtlich-Psychiatrie-Briefwechsel/dp/3796528570
working inside the wire
a) EN'ERGY, noun [Gr. work.] - "internal or inherent power"...hence all for one and one for all. Everything works so that each thing can be employed within.
b) Inside (life) the wire (inception towards death)....one cannot be outside the wire, yet many willingly deny being.
to essentially wage war against us.
a) Essence implies each being...suggested pluralism (us) tempts consenting beings into conflicts of reason against each other aka wars.
b) "For the wages of sin is death" ~Romans 6:23
Sin aka syn (together with)... https://www.etymonline.com/word/syn- which is why sin/syn (together) destroys life essence (apart) if waged upon.
Magnets are magic
a) Natural - Elect (choice) implies Magh (to be able; have power), hence each being representing elect-magh.
Artificial - elecTRICK + magNETick, hence tricking both into bondage aka suggested electromagnetism.
b) Notice the difference between magh + mag...
That's where the magic happens...and where the H becomes silent as in phonetic age/aiw (vital force)... https://www.etymonline.com/word/age
c) Electricity implies choice (elect) center (city)...magic is used to attract elect (choice) from city (center) aka temptation (want) drawing resistance (need) off-center.
a) Questioning tempts others onto a "quest" towards suggested outcomes, while ignoring perceivable origin.
Nature doesn't answer questions...it offers the ongoing solution (inception towards death) for each temporary problem (life).
b) One needs to resist the wanted temptation to ignore what WAS perceivable for what IS suggested; otherwise another gains ones permission to shape what IS to obfuscate what WAS.
Free will of choice implies "alone" aka all (in) one, hence each ones choice at the center of all balance, while struggling to resist the temptation of each other to bind self.
You and I tempt ONE to ignore self for others, hence i am (je suis; jesus) and you (phonetic jew).
Few are selected by many coming together, which in return permits each chosen one to remain apart... https://www.amazon.com/People-Apart-Europe-1789-1939-History/dp/0198219806
Chosen one implies the inversion of ones choice...viewing self as part of few implies an artificial distortion of being one within all aka partial within whole.
Real implies ones response (re) to all (al) perceivable...consenting to suggested distorts ones clarity.
Assert/adserere - "to join together"...contradicts being apart from one another, hence being enable to wield FREE will of choice.
Implication (if/then) doesn't join together like reason, but separates if (action; motion; flow) and then (reaction; matter; form) from one another.
Utilizing implication within a moving system allows one to notice contradictions shaped by holding onto something (mentally or physically).
If reason; then versus/verto - "to turn" which contradicts being (life) straightened (inception towards death).
a) Being implies difference (life) during sameness (inception towards death). Few equalize differences by tempting many to react alike one another.
b) Only nature does...each being within re-does self, while being (life) done (inception towards death).
For example...few suggest actors under directors to distract many from reacting to being (life) directed (inception towards death).
Only those within a conflict lay a claim to a side...free will of choice operates in-between (life) sides (inception/death)...neither of which can be held onto, hence others shaping conflicts of reason by tempting choice with artificial sides like yes vs no, true vs false; he vs she; me vs you; us vs them; belief vs disbelief; pro vs contra; agree vs disagree; left vs right; up vs down; front vs back; football vs soccer; liberal vs conservative; poor vs rich; mcdonalds vs burger king; beauty vs ugly; britney spears vs christina aguilera; trump vs biden; ukraine vs russia; jews vs gentiles; black vs white; red vs blue; smacks vs frosties; vanilla vs chocolate; coffee vs tea; nationalism vs internationalism; communism vs capitalism; christianity vs islam; orthodox vs catholic; wahabi vs sunni; individual vs collective; bourgeois vs proletariat; winning vs losing etc.
Each of those conflicts of reason represents a rebranding of want vs not wanting suggested, while ignoring perceivable need.