a) Leo > leon > lion > lyin'...
b) Being implies analysis (perception) during solution (perceivable)...one ignores this by consenting to the suggestion of another, which implies a synthesis.
c) Evolve/evolvere/wel - "to turn"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/evolve
Nature implies linear procession (inception towards death)...few within trick many with suggested information into circular thinking (logic); which turns into a conflict of reason against one another.
Suggested information implies "theory"; reasoning about it implies "evolution".
- Good... state of wanting
- Bad... state of not wanting
- Change... needed process
towards Demolition man's future
One can only build upon foundation...ignoring this for building "towards future" demolishes anything build. Watching movies; while ignoring being (life) moved (inception towards death) demolishes being.
Simon says
Simon/shama - "he heard" + Phoenix/phonics - "sound"...one hears the sound of silence; which whatever word one says shapes into noise.
There can be only sound...not OR ELSE. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LQIRD57lls8
I AM
a) I AM aka je suis aka jesus...the origin of jew (phonetic you).
b) Identity Access Management aka suggested likeness (identity) tempting each different ones consent (access) to the manual control (manage) of mind (ment)...that's how a hive-mind aka golem/goyim is being established.
what you think the end of the world might look like when you have a chance
a) Being in-between beginning and end implies being given choice...taking a chance forfeits ones choice.
b) World implies virile (wer) age (ald)... https://www.etymonline.com/word/world which refers to living in-between beginning (inception) and end (death).
Choice implies ones response to origin; chance tempts ones choice towards outcome.
the real work progresses without notice
Aka ones response (re) to all (al) working progression of nature.
be paying attention
Notice/notes - "known" implies all perceivable inspiration given; which ones perception ignores when taking notes from one another.
Nature gives notice towards each beings "free" will of choice...few tempt many to sell out by buying into suggested bank-NOTES aka banking the flow of knowledge.
it's nearly impossible to participate in modern society without one.
PART-icipate implies being apart from one another; SOC-i-al implies together within all...nature separates beings to free potential, which implies im-possi-ble (potential enabled within).
to maximize asset growth, minimize taxes, and provide continuous liquidity.
Nature implies the continuous liquidity; asset growth implies few amassing many, and minimizing taxes refers to burdening many with taxes aka with currency (suggestion) held onto (consent), while ignoring the current (perceivable) of nature.
It's a complex, highly specialized
Many represent the complex; few the specialized. Special implies particular aka apart from one another, which is what amassing together into a complex ignores.
Nature doesn't com (together) plex (to weave)...it separates each being from one another, hence making each one special.
In essence...it's about a continuous cycle
Only within a linear abstract (inception towards death) can there be essence (life)...circular thinking (logic) tempts one to ignore that.
Now, turn
Now implies ones perception of linear progression...ignoring this for before vs after implies the turn within ones mind aka circular logic.
Nobody cares
Caring implies carrying burdens...to be implies being relieved of all burdens.
You have 0 post score.
Score; noun - "an account kept of something past; a debt; a mark"... https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/score
Having no scores to settle implies being free...
entire existence
Being implies fraction within integer, hence only within entire can one exist.
You never posted anything
Everything perceivable is given towards each ones perception...posting anything suggested tempts one to ignore all given.
you don't aim to contribute
a) Aiming implies towards outcome, hence wanting to get (tar-get)...free will of choice implies ones response to origin, hence needing to adapt to what one already got.
b) Tribute; noun - "stated sum of money or other valuable consideration paid by one ruler or country to another in acknowledgment of submission"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/tribute
Paying another implies selling self out. Free will of choice cannot pay tributes without contradicting itself.
You're a chatbot
Which bot can adapt to perceivable inspiration on the fly? Also...chatting aka idle talk aka babble implies babylon (babbling on).
Nature implies ongoing activity; each being within temporary re-activation....ignoring nature for one another tempts one into idleness.
I wished for mods
One who submits wishes for moderation by another aka shirking of response-ability...voting representatives is based upon exploiting that.
Nobody could be more useless
How could one use no body? What if each one implies body (matter) within mind (momentum) of all (motion).
Most users have blocked
a) Nature promotes "free" will of choice to each being...few exploit ones ignorance thereof by tempting many to block each other.
b) Nature uses; each being within re-uses nature or ab-uses each other, which requires an artificial block upon ones natural free will of choice aka "willing ignorance".
it helps me to stay sane
Sane/sanus - "sound"...sound moves, which prevents each instrument within from staying too long.
Sleight of hand for those with eyes to see.... https://genius.com/The-clash-should-i-stay-or-should-i-go-lyrics
Resisting the clash (reason) allows one to discern self as staying (life) during going (inception towards death)
If you actually had arguments...
...then my arguing mind would ignore actual perception for fictional reasoning about suggestion.
Argumentation (vs) contradicts implication (if/then)...all implies one; argumentation implies one vs another, while ignoring all.
how useless you are, and how useful I am
Useless vs useful argumentation implies self abuse, while seeking others to abuse. The only way out...letting go of self possession (I am).
like you...and the difference is way big
Free-will-of-choice comments LIKE who else? What if only DIFFERENCE can be free?
she was just copying
Copying (perception) source (perceivable) or mimicking (consent) one another (suggested)...
Being within nature implies different copy within same origin.
copying older ancient truths
Old vs new; ancient vs recent; truth vs lie...a circular conflict based on mimicry of one another; not copying linear origin.
Instead of old vs new...try now. Instead of ancient vs recent...try sentience. Instead of truth vs lie...try change.
You don't like Blavatsky, go to the source
Like vs dislike tempts one to ignore that same source differentiates each being.
before the gnostics
Forwarding being generates gnostic/gno - "to know" aka all perceivable moving towards each ones perception.
Those who seek, shall find.
Only withing foundation (perceivable) can one seek (suggested)...seeking tempts one to ignore foundation, and since foundation moves life from inception towards death..."those who seek, shall find".
not yet with a soul
Soul/sole implies "one and only" aka all (whole) for each one (partial) within aka all of nature moving through each being within.
The "soulless" choose to ignore all (perceivable) for one another (suggestion), hence not lacking a soul, but lessening ones access to the sole origin of being by willingly ignoring/denying it.
machine
Machine/magh - "to be able, have power"...nature enables being; beings trick one another with artificial magic/magh to ignore nature.
Nature enables each being to be manual; many following the suggestions of few become automatons, because each one shirks manual response-ability (free will of choice) onto another.
look like
Nature moves each being apart from one another during a process (inception towards death) of separation (life). Looking/locking alike tempts one to ignore being differentiated from one another.
Llm produce individualized pacification propaganda
So are languages. Notice that in most hero journeys the adversary sabotages his plots by talking, hence permitting the hero to do his thing.
Nature moves sound through instruments, which inspires instruments to adapt to sound. Words shaped; shared and held onto by minds (ment) structured (stru) within (in) sound are pacifying adaptation.
Words (logos) > circular thinking (logic) > turning against each other (reason)...pacifists at war with one another.
to poison LLM crawlers
If you distinguish between crawlers, then you ignore that the world wide web crawls any input.
SPAM
Perceivable inspiration implies everything available at any moment to anyone's perception within...suggested information is being shared by one another to distract from perceivable, and has to fill in the discrepancy with SPAM aka copy&paste repetition.
LLM
Model implies "likeness made to scale"...being implies differentiation (life) during equalization (inception towards death).
Few tempt many to learn languages, as to make many alike and scalable. The use of LLM's as technology aka tekhnē (artifice) + logy (logic) distracts many from languages being crafted spells by few.
advertising
Ad (toward) verto (to turn)...hence using advertisement to turn the mind of life from inception towards death aka from perceivable origin towards suggested outcome.
What's so ridiculous about this... https://img.gvid.tv/i/4BY6KRZ6.png
Finite information for many; infinite inspiration for few...nature doesn't get stuck; LLMs and AI tempt many to stick to an artificial feedback loop for a while.
As for training...nature offers each being the opportunity to learn to teach self and vice versa within an inexhaustible environment. It's beings learning and teaching from one another which exhaust each other.
why everything we believe about infidelity is wrong
a) Infidelity - "want of faith", hence unbeliever (infidel)...
b) Everything implies need, each thing within implies want (life) struggling within need (inception towards death), while tempting each other into conflicts of reason...want vs not want aka believe vs disbelief aka right vs wrong.
c) Faith/bheidh - "to trust" implies ones consent to the suggestion of another, while ignoring ones "free" will of choice. Trust binds choice, which is what a jew utilizes to bind gentiles into conflicts of reason against one another.
divorce
Aka di (divide) vorce/verte (to turn)...hence dividing those turning against one another from one another. Marriage implies a contract aka drawn (trahere) together (con) CONTRA-wise...
Nature straightens (inception towards death) beings (life) apart from one another, which only then permit intercourse for further off-spring...a rite of separation.
cheat pass
Cheat/escheat/excadere aka ex (out of) cadere (to fall) implies each beings rise (life) out of fall (inception towards death), which implies a pass-over...
The status quo of being implies "cheat pass"...a jew tempts gentiles to give cheat passes to one another, while ignoring all given each one a passing cheat.
16 straight, 16 curvy rays
a) Straight (inception towards death) generates curve (life)
b) Straight light generates a spectrum which curves each ray within aka bending the light.
c) 16 aka 1+6=7 aka seven...straight and curve S(plit)EVEN
common trait
a) Each jew suggests trait/trade to tempt gentiles into becoming common traders/traitors.
b) Nature sets each being apart from one another, hence "free" from one another...consenting to each others suggestions joins together (common) what nature sets apart (private).
c) Trait/trahere - "to pull, draw" aka each jew utilizing suggestion to pull; draw at the consent of gentiles aka the natural struggle between resistance (life) and temptation (inception towards death).
what if...just curious
Curious implies "desirous of seeing"...putting it at the end of a suggested implication (if/then) tempts the desire of others to see the suggested outcome, while ignoring perceivable origin.
That's how a jew turns the minds of gentiles against one another within conflicts of reason (good vs evil).
hanukkah
Hanukkah - "consecration" implies creating (crat) together (con) apart (seco) within action (ion) aka utilizing suggested creationism to tempt gentiles together, which when consented to, permits each jew to remain apart within whole of transformation.
own profits
One cannot own pro (forwards) bhet (to speak)...one can tempt others to claim what's spoken forwards as corpus oration.
own brands
Fire cannot be owned...it was given as animating force towards being, while burning out.
cramming black into nearly all ads
Advertisement implies turning (vert) mind (ment) towards (ad), hence from perceivable light towards suggested darkness, which can never be all, since all implies light, but it can nearly engulf each one within darkness (ignorance).
Almost no one comprehends
All perceivable sets each one perception apart from one another...suggested com (together) prehendere (to catch hold of, seize) inverts that.
The opposite of comprehension? Discernment aka separation (dis) of perceiving (cern) mind (ment).
change in the global power structure
Glo (round mass) be (being) implies the amassing of beings into circular logic inwards; which turns into conflicts of reason outwards.
Change implies linear progression...global implies a circular structure shaped within, which drains the power of those who ignore linear progression.
coming of a divine child which will usher in a new golden age
Aka coming (inception) of a divine/divided child (life) which will (free will of choice) usher in a new/now golden (malleable aka able to shape) age/aiw (vital force).
In short...each one coming into being within all.
Fourth Eclogue
Eclogue/ekloge - "selection" aka ones free will of choice being tempted by the suggestions of others to make a first; second; third; fourth etc. selection, while ignoring to be ONEs choice within all balance.
Choice implies reaction to balance...not selection of other choices.
the last part of my lost life
Aka the lasting (dying) of ones losing (living) part within whole.
Life isn't lost, but growing (life) during loss (inception towards death).
if I had breathe enough
Infinite breath (inception towards death) moving through each finite breath-taker (life)...hence what's being taken has to be given away, and what was given (living) shall be taken (dying).
end all war
All cannot be at war; each piece/peace within can ignore self discernment by waging war against one another. This war is called "reason"...
world of peace
Aka wer (motion) ald (momentum) of piece (matter). Being implies a piece (peace) within the age (ald) of man (wer).
nursed with divine gifts
That which nurses (inception towards death) divines/divides (life) into gift aka that which is given and poison (deadly potion/position/portion/potential etc.)
Hyper (excess) + agent (action).
All implies ongoing action; each one within implies a temporary reaction...both excess and scarcity are suggested by few to tempt many to ignore self discernment.
a non-human...
...implies one's de-nial (nihilo; nothing) of being (matter) hue (momentum) within man (motion).
willfull force...
...implies need (inception towards death) forcing want (life) to wield free will of choice. Few suggest full and empty to distract from that.
guiding ideologies
Few suggest idealism to tempt the consent of many into circular logic within self, which turns into conflicts of reason against one another.
Since logic implies a circular course...it doesn't need to be guided. Instead...few misguide many from linear (inception towards death) progression (life).
not reducible to one
a) All implies oneness (whole) for each one (partial) within. All moves each unit of matter apart from one another during a process of increasing (inception) and reducing (death) aka living within process of dying.
b) Not implies ones denial of all for one another's suggestions, which reduces ones perception of all into a controlled environment by few within ones mind/memory.
it moves through systems, stories and symbols
While a being holds onto suggested systems, stories and symbols...perceivable nature moves through (inception towards death) each being (life).
principalities
Prin (prime; first) cip (capere; to grasp) al (all)...all implies primal; each one within implies secondary (seco; to divide). Grasping onto each others suggestions tempts one to ignore divine/divide.
Being implies within PRIN of AL...struggling with the temptation to CIP.
rulers of darkness
Rule/reg - "to move in a straight line" implies being (life) moved in a straight line (inception towards death)....discerning this implies brightness; ignoring it implies darkness.
Ignoring perceivable for suggested selects those suggesting as "rulers of darkness".
spiritual wickedness
Being implies wicked/wick/weg - "to be strong; lively" within spirit/spiro- "to breathe" of all, hence "no rest for the wicked" (during motion).
jews secretly run the world?
a) A jew runs the world/vault aka the revolving minds of gentiles.
b) Gentiles ignore the world/werald aka wer (man) + ald (age) aka motion running momentum through matter.
c) Secret/seco - "to divide", hence the artificial division of a gentile mind turning from nature into a vault, and the natural division of world aka wer+ald.
you are saying
That's how a jew tempts gentiles to establish a vault within mind/memory around suggested information, while ignoring the flow of perceivable inspiration.
Nature doesn't say anything...it moves sound apart. Saying implies articulation of sound, which a jew utilizes as both spell-craft and soothsaying to distract gentiles from nature.
Truman was...a 33rd degree Freemason. His chief advisor was David K. Niles
D.NILE...the chief advisor of TRU MAN.
Iran vs israel
The sides are suggested to versus/verto - "turn" ones sight from perceivable. Holding onto either side distorts ones sight.
Sleight of hand:
- I turned to look, but it was gone
- I cannot put my finger on it now
- I have become comfortably numb
Reason among gentiles represents the war, and Trump; Bibi; Khamenei and Tate are inciting consent with suggested information.
Taking and giving statements within any court of law is based on an artificial language model as proof or evidence...not on nature.
AI can only feed back what those using it have freely given, hence giving artificial authority is based on shirking ones response-ability (free will of choice) within nature.