a) Disprove implies the division (dis) of prove/pro-bhwo (being forwarded)... https://www.etymonline.com/word/prove hence prove/proof being in the pudding/putting.
b) Prove vs disprove implies both sides against (contra) one another...hence contra-diction.
You are contradicting me.
Free-will-of-choice doesn't upvote or downvote, hence not taking any side within any conflict against (contra) another. That's ones struggle to remaining free from one another.
Analysis (taking words apart) allows one to see the contradictions others are synthetically holding onto by consenting to a suggestion.
you don't believe doing so is bad
a) Bad vs good implies ones consent to suggested moralism, hence believing by giving faith and taking for gospel (good spell).
b) Believing binds ones "free" will of choice, hence religion aka re (to respond) ligo (to bind).
c) You vs me; do vs don't; believe vs disbelief; good vs bad...that's four conflicts of reason aka contradictions is such a short sentence. Four times you chose to hold onto a side against others...how is that good?
That's your side.
How does writing...love vs hate, hence versus/verto - "to turn"...imply taking a side? Where did I (life) turn from the straight path (inception towards death) of nature?
according to your philosophy
a) Accord aka ad (to) cordis (heart).
b) Phi-lo-sophy (love-logic-knowledge).
Logic implies a mental conflict of reason (love vs hate)...which tempts one to ignore all knowledge moving through each ones heart and mind.
How does a heart choose a side to hold onto?
Saying things does no such thing
a) Saying NO shapes suggested nihil-ism into consenting de-nial of everything perceivable.
b) Only within motion can matter be shaped...holding onto a shape (mentally or physically) denies motion.
c) How could "no" do anything? Explain to me the origin of NOTHING? Where did you get "nothing" from? What gives you the authority to wield "nothing" over others? Why do you feel so comfortable to base your responses on "nothing"?
You are inverting words into something with mystical magic power
Nature doesn't turn sound into words...sound delineates (inception towards death) instruments (life).
b) Ignoring perceivable sound for suggested words implies mystical/myein - "to close, shut"...nature opens all (perceivable) to each one (perception).
Ask yourself if mystical implies "missing all" when listening to one another?
c) Magic/magh - "to be able" implies towards (inception towards death) being (life) enabled by nature. The issue is "make-belief" aka disabling self by consenting to the suggestion of another.
d) Power/poti - "potential" implies ones possibility within all energy. Power implies the expression of matter within impressing motion. Words suppress ones expression within impressing sound....if held onto.
Through suggested words others gain ones power by consent.
Words are just tools
a) Tool implies instrument aka "mind structured within" sound.
b) Just aka "righteous in the eyes of God" implies all natural law...not judging one another. "judge not less ye be judged".
It's few who suggest many to JUST DO IT...
Stop picking your car apart and drive the car.
That which gives (inception) and takes (death) apart (life) cannot be stopped...it moves.
Living within process of dying implies being driven aka derive; verb - "to flow, pour out; originate".
Wherever one drives his car...there's only one final destination for each one within all. Why are you driving a car? To reach your destination faster...could that have a natural implication to think like that, while being moved from inception towards death?
How does one build a car without synthesizing parts, and how could parts come into being without analysis? What comes first...the car; the parts to build the car, or the whole separating parts from one another?
Stop picking words apart and talk normally.
The norm aka the consensus; the standard; the mainstream narrative; the orders to follow; the place where everybody knows your name... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VXED2AVlbR0
To commit aka com (together) mittere (send)...being implies send apart from one another....That must be a bad thing, in your opinion. Why??
a) Good vs bad reasoning is based on your circular thinking (logic)...I describe the linear motion of nature separating matter into each being.
b) Procession separates potential, hence sending each one free from one another. Sending together implies binding together aka restricting potential.
Notice inter-course (synthesis) for off-spring (analysis)...notice furthermore that one needs to resist the want to synthesize, hence corrupting sex/seco (to divide) with lust (loss).
c) Are you more than one? Can you be more than one? If you're joining others, then are you more than one or are you counting others, while ignoring self?
Can you describe the natural states of ZERO and TWO? How does ONE perceive those?
It tempts free-will-of-choice to hate memes for no reason.
Again...love vs hate implies a conflict of reason based on your circular thinking.
Free will of choice needs to utilize implication (if/then) while resisting the wanted temptation of reason (vs) aka balance instead of imbalance.
Instead of loving or hating memes...I simply describe what mimicry implies.
To meme/mimic/mock ignores what nature offers, which is why beings get offended by one another during meme-warfare.
the definition of idolatry is prioritizing thibgs above God.
Definition aka to affix (definit) action (ion). God implies all action (perceivable) for each ones reaction (perception) within. It's consenting to the suggestions of one another, which tempts one to ignore all perceivable.
All perceivable (inspiration) moves through each ones perception and cannot be held onto, which is why anything suggested (information) tempts ones consent to hold onto ideals/idols...like words within sound.
As for definition aka DEAF PHONETICIAN aka one deaf to phonics (sound)...yet again spell-craft; thinly disguised from those with eyes to see.
above God
God implies as above/so below aka the balance for each ones free will of choice in-between. It's seeking understanding (standing under), which imbalances many below under few above.
Something prioritized above God.
a) Prior/pri - "before", hence forwarded (inception towards death) being (life)...not a conflict between before vs after or priority vs irrelevance.
b) Something implies "sum of things" aka a synthesis of what everything separates into each thing for analysis.
It's ones consent to any suggestion of one another which shapes a "something" out of each thing within everything. That's tikkun olam (repairing the world by bringing together) aka mosaic law (puzzling pieces into whole) aka creatio ex nihilo (something out of nothing).
A jew tempts gentiles together, hence amassing a sum aka a quantity aka an amount (mount zion) etc.
perceivable vs suggested
Perceivable implicates (if/then) aka if all perceivable, then each ones perception. Suggestion turns one away from perceivable (logic) and against (versus) one another.
It's suggested vs suggested, while ignoring perceivable. Perception cannot be turned against anything; suggestion turns one from perceivable, hence from linear thinking into circular thinking.
To believe implies holding onto a side, while nature moves...which establishes circulatory rotation aka shaping matter during motion into tumbleweed.
avoid contradictions
A VOID implies "nothing" aka ones de-nial (nihilo; nothing) of everything perceivable. That's the contra-dict-ion aka the dictated turning within action.
To know implies each things perception within everything perceivable...what if nothing was suggested to you by others? Could that be used to exploit your ignorance?
own self
Self implies perpetuation of potential through one another during procession...owning implies taking possession, which contradicts the aforementioned.
A being cannot take nature into possession, or in other words...potential cannot take procession into possession.
You imply mockery
What's the origin of YOU? One taking possession over self as "me; myself or I", which labels anyone else into a "you".
Where's the mockery? I AM aka je suis (jesus) shaping YOU (phonetic jew).
Jesus (taking possession over self) contradicts Christ (to anoint aka being separated from one another within all/oil.
a) Disprove implies the division (dis) of prove/pro-bhwo (being forwarded)... https://www.etymonline.com/word/prove hence prove/proof being in the pudding/putting.
b) Prove vs disprove implies both sides against (contra) one another...hence contra-diction.
Free-will-of-choice doesn't upvote or downvote, hence not taking any side within any conflict against (contra) another. That's ones struggle to remaining free from one another.
Analysis (taking words apart) allows one to see the contradictions others are synthetically holding onto by consenting to a suggestion.
a) Bad vs good implies ones consent to suggested moralism, hence believing by giving faith and taking for gospel (good spell).
b) Believing binds ones "free" will of choice, hence religion aka re (to respond) ligo (to bind).
c) You vs me; do vs don't; believe vs disbelief; good vs bad...that's four conflicts of reason aka contradictions is such a short sentence. Four times you chose to hold onto a side against others...how is that good?
How does writing...love vs hate, hence versus/verto - "to turn"...imply taking a side? Where did I (life) turn from the straight path (inception towards death) of nature?
a) Accord aka ad (to) cordis (heart).
b) Phi-lo-sophy (love-logic-knowledge).
Logic implies a mental conflict of reason (love vs hate)...which tempts one to ignore all knowledge moving through each ones heart and mind.
How does a heart choose a side to hold onto?
a) Saying NO shapes suggested nihil-ism into consenting de-nial of everything perceivable.
b) Only within motion can matter be shaped...holding onto a shape (mentally or physically) denies motion.
c) How could "no" do anything? Explain to me the origin of NOTHING? Where did you get "nothing" from? What gives you the authority to wield "nothing" over others? Why do you feel so comfortable to base your responses on "nothing"?
a) Only sound can be turned into words. Sound/sanus - "entire; whole".... https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/sound
Nature doesn't turn sound into words...sound delineates (inception towards death) instruments (life).
b) Ignoring perceivable sound for suggested words implies mystical/myein - "to close, shut"...nature opens all (perceivable) to each one (perception).
Ask yourself if mystical implies "missing all" when listening to one another?
c) Magic/magh - "to be able" implies towards (inception towards death) being (life) enabled by nature. The issue is "make-belief" aka disabling self by consenting to the suggestion of another.
Also...sorcery implies source (perceivable) enabling ingredient (perception).
d) Power/poti - "potential" implies ones possibility within all energy. Power implies the expression of matter within impressing motion. Words suppress ones expression within impressing sound....if held onto.
Through suggested words others gain ones power by consent.
a) Tool implies instrument aka "mind structured within" sound.
b) Just aka "righteous in the eyes of God" implies all natural law...not judging one another. "judge not less ye be judged".
It's few who suggest many to JUST DO IT...
That which gives (inception) and takes (death) apart (life) cannot be stopped...it moves.
Living within process of dying implies being driven aka derive; verb - "to flow, pour out; originate".
Wherever one drives his car...there's only one final destination for each one within all. Why are you driving a car? To reach your destination faster...could that have a natural implication to think like that, while being moved from inception towards death?
How does one build a car without synthesizing parts, and how could parts come into being without analysis? What comes first...the car; the parts to build the car, or the whole separating parts from one another?
The norm aka the consensus; the standard; the mainstream narrative; the orders to follow; the place where everybody knows your name... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VXED2AVlbR0
Anyway; norm/gnōmōn - "carpenter's square"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/norm It's freemasonry and circular logic represents the compass.
a) Good vs bad reasoning is based on your circular thinking (logic)...I describe the linear motion of nature separating matter into each being.
b) Procession separates potential, hence sending each one free from one another. Sending together implies binding together aka restricting potential.
Notice inter-course (synthesis) for off-spring (analysis)...notice furthermore that one needs to resist the want to synthesize, hence corrupting sex/seco (to divide) with lust (loss).
c) Are you more than one? Can you be more than one? If you're joining others, then are you more than one or are you counting others, while ignoring self?
Can you describe the natural states of ZERO and TWO? How does ONE perceive those?
Again...love vs hate implies a conflict of reason based on your circular thinking.
Free will of choice needs to utilize implication (if/then) while resisting the wanted temptation of reason (vs) aka balance instead of imbalance.
Instead of loving or hating memes...I simply describe what mimicry implies.
To meme/mimic/mock ignores what nature offers, which is why beings get offended by one another during meme-warfare.
Definition aka to affix (definit) action (ion). God implies all action (perceivable) for each ones reaction (perception) within. It's consenting to the suggestions of one another, which tempts one to ignore all perceivable.
All perceivable (inspiration) moves through each ones perception and cannot be held onto, which is why anything suggested (information) tempts ones consent to hold onto ideals/idols...like words within sound.
As for definition aka DEAF PHONETICIAN aka one deaf to phonics (sound)...yet again spell-craft; thinly disguised from those with eyes to see.
God implies as above/so below aka the balance for each ones free will of choice in-between. It's seeking understanding (standing under), which imbalances many below under few above.
a) Prior/pri - "before", hence forwarded (inception towards death) being (life)...not a conflict between before vs after or priority vs irrelevance.
b) Something implies "sum of things" aka a synthesis of what everything separates into each thing for analysis.
It's ones consent to any suggestion of one another which shapes a "something" out of each thing within everything. That's tikkun olam (repairing the world by bringing together) aka mosaic law (puzzling pieces into whole) aka creatio ex nihilo (something out of nothing).
A jew tempts gentiles together, hence amassing a sum aka a quantity aka an amount (mount zion) etc.
Perceivable implicates (if/then) aka if all perceivable, then each ones perception. Suggestion turns one away from perceivable (logic) and against (versus) one another.
It's suggested vs suggested, while ignoring perceivable. Perception cannot be turned against anything; suggestion turns one from perceivable, hence from linear thinking into circular thinking.
To believe implies holding onto a side, while nature moves...which establishes circulatory rotation aka shaping matter during motion into tumbleweed.
A VOID implies "nothing" aka ones de-nial (nihilo; nothing) of everything perceivable. That's the contra-dict-ion aka the dictated turning within action.
A being cannot avoid nature.
CAN NOT...what can nothing do? Can/gno - "to know"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/can
To know implies each things perception within everything perceivable...what if nothing was suggested to you by others? Could that be used to exploit your ignorance?
Self implies perpetuation of potential through one another during procession...owning implies taking possession, which contradicts the aforementioned.
A being cannot take nature into possession, or in other words...potential cannot take procession into possession.
What's the origin of YOU? One taking possession over self as "me; myself or I", which labels anyone else into a "you".
Where's the mockery? I AM aka je suis (jesus) shaping YOU (phonetic jew).
Jesus (taking possession over self) contradicts Christ (to anoint aka being separated from one another within all/oil.