make some thing new
That implies ignoring all that was for something that wasn't...aka make-belief.
We have to let go
Can one (singular) let go of we (plural)?
- Oxy/ak - "rise out to a point"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/oxy-
Life being moved from inception towards death implies oxy-generation, which as solid within fluid also implies hydro-generation.
a) Rule 1: Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person.
b) Artifice cannot describe natural without contradicting itself...
c) Dumb; adj - "mute, silent, refraining from speaking or unable to speak"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/dumb
How could the written word be vocal; loud and speaking? What if suggested words tempt one to ignore that perceivable sound implies silence... https://genius.com/Simon-and-garfunkel-the-sound-of-silence-lyrics
hostile to all
One cannot be hostile to all for all implies the host of each one within.
persecution
a) Aka per (by) secu (to divide) tion (action)...reaction coming into being implies by the division of action.
The status quo of being implies persecution...a jew suggests gentiles that it means chasing after one another.
b) Persecution; noun - "oppression for the holding of a belief"...notice that a jew suggests gentiles what to belief, which when consented to, suppresses ones choice under fictitious oppression by a chosen ones suggestion.
Free will of choice cannot be oppressed...only tricked into suppressing itself.
hate the jews
a) If a gentiles hates; then a jew loves and vice versa. That's how balance works. The trick...choosing either side puts both in conflict with one another, and ones choice into imbalance.
b) Instead of "hate the jews" try to resist suggested moralism (love or hate); theism (the) and pluralism (jews). That grows ones resistance to any suggested temptation by another.
you have no more bitter, more poisonous, more vehement an enemy than a real jew
a) Real implies ones response (re) to all (al) perceivable. Ones consent to anything suggested implies fiction.
b) Enemy implies "within me"...hence consent inviting the suggestion of another into self, while making oneself ones own biggest enemy.
c) jew implies phonetic YOU, which originates from one claiming self as "ME; MYSELF OR I", hence I AM (je suis; jesus) generating YOU (jew).
That's how jew (you) killed jesus (I) with the nail (de-nial)...
Nazi/nati - "native"...holding onto a definition contradicts the division of native from foreign.
immune
Immune aka im/in (within) mune/mei (change) implies being within (life) change (inception towards death) aka exposed to immunization.
A jew suggests immunity as an exemption from...if a gentile consents to the suggested, then he becomes liable to it.
jews were the only ones
"jews" (plurality) contradicts "only ones" (singularity)...this contradiction permits each jew to exploit gentiles collectively.
King/kin/gene - "give birth, beget"...
- https://www.etymonline.com/word/king
- https://www.etymonline.com/word/kin
- https://www.etymonline.com/word/*gene-
Related to this...crown/korona/sker - "to turn; bend". The king wearing the crown implies each begotten being turning within self (logic) while bending against one another (reason).
all around us
"Around" implies confining self to circular thinking (logic) instead of thinking straight, while "us" implies a suggested pluralism tempting the consenting singular from discerning oneself within all perceivable.
to put mind control into music
What others put into music can only tempt ones mind to consent to outside control...it's ones free will of choice to give others control over ones mind by inviting music/muse into it.
Common law
A contradiction in terms aka plural (common) singular (law) aka mono-poly...a game.
law of the land
Law implies L(and) A(ir) W(ater)..."law of the land" represents a rhetorical test for ones discernment, just like "sovereign citizen".
recognized by custom
Re-cogni implies ones perception...cu-stom (together with another) contradicts that.
Few suggest sales to tempt many into custom consensus...buying into it sacrifices ones perception. A costumer only recognizes advertisements...not the selling out of self to another when trading ones choice for a chosen ones suggestion.
moral consensus
The only consensus within morality implies both sides consenting to be in conflict with one another. Morality implies consensus of mutual destruction.
common law crimes like murder
Notice that murder during mob violence hardly gets justice because it's harder to find the singular among the common...
Why do you think few tempt many together into protests to train so called "swarm" surveillance? It's because of the power of the singular among the weakness of the common.
should be
Should implies "to owe"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/shall
Believing that others owe tricks one into becoming owned by another. FREE will of choice doesn't owe and cannot own....it can ignore itself (ones choice) for another (chosen one) though.
Many of our problems confronting us
Singular solution (inception towards death) generates each singular problem (life)...it's plurality which tricks one to believe that problems keep growing.
"Many; our; problems; confront; us"...these represent artificial plurality, shaped within natural singularity.
problems would be solved
If being implies problem (life) during solution (inception towards death); then each problem will be solved.
if one thing was different.
One can only be different from one another...unless ignored for plurality.
stupidity should be painful
Stupid/stupor/stop - "cessation of motion"...there cannot be a cessation of motion within nature, only each beings free will of choice to ignore being moved.
a) There cannot be too much or too little of nature...only each beings choice to ignore all of nature for too little or too much from one another.
b) More (inception towards death) generates less (life)...less struggles to sustain self during more and more and more...
c) The growing of knowledge lessens ones ignorance...it's the bliss of ignorance one misses, because it covered the burden of growing self apart from one another.
d) I (life) miss the way (inception towards death)...that's a suicidal attitude.
Utah University
a) Utah = yudah... https://www.etymonline.com/word/Utah
b) Universe aka uni (one) vers (to turn) aka turning ones choice into a chosen one, which destroys ones freedom...
Charlie Kirk
a) Charlie/charles/carl - "freeman"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/carl
b) Kirk/kirkja - "church"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/kirk
What is the ideal goverment type
Both idealism (ideal) and symbolism (type) represent tools by others to govern ones mind. Letting go of ideals/idols prevents others from governing ones mind.
They presupposed voting
THEY implies ones singular vote for a plurality of others. Holding onto the plurality implies the supposition.
Viewing freemasonry as a plurality/group/brotherhood of man etc. tempts one to ignore that each of the 33 steps is about setting oneself free from others.
Masonry implies building walls (ignorance) by joining (consent) bricks (suggested information) together, which one can only do by "free" will of choice.
complaining about free speech suppression and suggesting...is a contradiction.
Because suggestion contradicts perception.
natural causes
There's only one cause (nature) for each effect (being) within...suggested pluralism (causes) tempts ones consent by voting.
Few are governing many by plurality...nature sets each being free from one another.
Free Speech Enforcement is unConstitutional.
Constitute implies "standing together"...aka the choice to restrict self.
Nobody can enforce
Being implies "force-en" aka forced into being...others suggest en-force-ment to manipulate ones mind.
to criminalize words
What if sound implies law and any word shaped within a crime against it?
that should not be said...
...but can and will be said by free will of choice, unless self restricting.
Communist
COM (together) UNI (apart from one another)...consenting to any suggestion makes one part of a COM-UNI-ty. That's how few centralize power by tricking many together.
if someone says "fire"...that is free speech
Articulating the word "fire" implies by free will of choice...aiming it at another implies an offense upon the free will of choice of another.
Shaping words within sound implies freely shaping within dominance (free-dom)...sharing words binds free will of choice to one another.
the word "fire" is not enough
Any word implies a letter aka ones free will of choice LETTING another shape words....that's what stokes the fire by friction through bondage.
The solution that many are doing now is suing...for monetary profit.
a) Money implies a net negative for anyone consenting to it...only the chosen ones suggesting it make profit + interest.
b) A solution reveals...suing implies a suit to conceal.
getting close to end times
As soon as one chooses to let go of measurements taken...time ends for one. It's not about getting close, but about closing oneself to all one got access to.
GOG (a sleight motion) + MAG (to knead, fashion, fit) aka fashioning by sleight of hand.
Transmitting sound and music with light
a) What if sound and light are the same for each different transmission shaped within?
b) What if the issue isn't about defining sound and light, but about discerning self to be within the audible and visible separation (spectrum) of all sound and light?
c) What if music represents a distortion of sound for anyone holding onto it aka "catching a tune"?
signals coming from out there
Signal implies each ones sight (sign) within all (al)...not an identifying mark shaped to describe to one another what one sees.
signals coming from out there, that, when converted...
From out there into here implies transmission by separation, which CON (together) VERT (to turn) inverts. The suggested word "convert" represents a crafted spell distorting the transmission of all perceivable through each ones perception.
Converting a signal distorts the linear transmission thereof.
be able to "hear" like even who knows what.
a) Being able implies one being enabled by all aka all sound enabling each ones hearing.
b) Sound enabling hearing implies sameness enabling differentiation...likeness tempts one to ignore all for one another.
Hearing alike implies ignoring differences. That's why all music is based on repeating tunes to catch like the pied piper did to the rats.
If they hadn't done it someone else would have.
If I don't kill you; then someone else will, therefore killing you became justified...
The problem is nothing to do with jews
If a jew sells the solution to a problem designed by a jew, then it's a gentiles fault for falling for the problem and paying for the solution.
Imagine a street for gentiles into which a jew digs a hole. Whenever a gentile falls into it, the jew blames him for it, then offers him help to get out for a price, while adding interest to it. That's the issue...the street represents the natural passage of life, while the hole represents any temptation suggested along it.
technological progress
Nature implies progression...any artificial technology shaped within implies regression. A jew sells technology as progression to tempt gentiles to ignore regression. Whatever technology one holds onto either pulls one down with it or gets dumbed for the next in line of progression.
Consenting to a suggested SENSOR permits those who suggest to CENSOR...using others to mediate senses censors self.
Example...using binoculars for artificial enhancement does not enhance ones natural sight, but narrows it to the artificial binoculars suggested by others. Notice how easy it is to sneak up on someone using binoculars...
phyphox
Physic/bheue - "to be" + phone/phonic - "sound"...consenting to a suggested "physical phone" distorts ones physic within all phonic.
discover the world of physics
If physic implies being, then world implies summation of beings together, which covers the division (dis) of each being from one another.
There's no "cover" over nature...only each beings free will of choice to cover self from natural with artificial.
Why did jews invent AI?
To automate the gentile want for artifice; with question + answer representing appetite + fodder.
Nature doesn't answer any question...it's the ongoing solution (hunger) for any temporal problem shaped within.
Example...any complex issue becomes simpler the more hunger grows. FOOD NOW implies natural procession overruling any artificial product. Suggested information represents the artificial product used by a jew to feed the appetite of gentiles, which distracts from the natural process of perceivable hunger.
Aka concealing the rise and fall of the son/sun aka covering illumination aka obscuring enlightenment...