Joe Rogan interviewed some kike who claimed we have no free will of choice. (((Sam Harris)))
I'd like for you to debate this kike. He claims there is no free will. You claim we have free will of choice. Which one of you is lying? Well he's a jew so we know he can't help but lie because his father is the father of lies. John 8:44
Free will of choice implies singular..."we" implies a suggested pluralism tempting ones free will of choice to consent. Others restrict ones free-dom if held onto.
I'd like for you to debate this kike
Like vs dislike...that's the debate within your gentile head. A jew knows that each being within nature is different from one another, hence tricking gentiles with "likeness".
Choosing a side contradicts ones free will of choice...only in-between (life) sides (inception/death) can there be choice.
Nature isn't open to debate...a jew suggests THE BAIT (de-bate) to tempt gentiles to ignore nature.
You claim we have free will of choice
a) YOU implies one claiming self as I AM (jesus), which brands every other one as YOU ARE (judah)...
b) Only nature gives (inception) and takes (death), which gives each being (life) free will of choice to adapt to given or try to take from one another.
c) Free will of choice cannot claim without contradicting itself.
Apple of sin aka "to apply to symmetry"...that's why it's forbidden to take the fruit of knowledge given freely.
Which one of you is lying?
Truth vs lie represents a debate (reason) among gentiles about a jewish suggestion, while ignoring perceivable CHANGE.
Nature changes being...holding onto truth or lie ignores change. Adaptation to change requires free will of choice.
because his father is the father of lies
"And call no man your father upon the earth: for one is your Father, which is in heaven." ~Matthew 23:9
It's gentiles who believe that "the father of lies" is true, which in return permits each jew to shape a lie aka the contradiction of truth within change.
What happens if one applies change to truth? It becomes a lie, and vice versa.
sam harris
Samuel (name of god) + Harris/harry/harjon (to lay waste, ravage, plunder)...
God gives sound...a jew articulates sound into words to trick gentiles into taking the name of god in vain, which in return permits each jew to lay waste; ravage, and plunder gentiles.
Pam/pan - "all, every, whole, all-inclusive" + Bondi (in bondage)...ain't jo/jew a sweetheart?
Joe Rogan interviewed some kike who claimed we have no free will of choice. (((Sam Harris)))
I'd like for you to debate this kike. He claims there is no free will. You claim we have free will of choice. Which one of you is lying? Well he's a jew so we know he can't help but lie because his father is the father of lies. John 8:44
Not sure of how we contact him to setup the debate. I found two possible emails [email protected] and [email protected]
Free will of choice implies singular..."we" implies a suggested pluralism tempting ones free will of choice to consent. Others restrict ones free-dom if held onto.
Like vs dislike...that's the debate within your gentile head. A jew knows that each being within nature is different from one another, hence tricking gentiles with "likeness".
Choosing a side contradicts ones free will of choice...only in-between (life) sides (inception/death) can there be choice.
Nature isn't open to debate...a jew suggests THE BAIT (de-bate) to tempt gentiles to ignore nature.
a) YOU implies one claiming self as I AM (jesus), which brands every other one as YOU ARE (judah)...
b) Only nature gives (inception) and takes (death), which gives each being (life) free will of choice to adapt to given or try to take from one another.
c) Free will of choice cannot claim without contradicting itself.
Apple of sin aka "to apply to symmetry"...that's why it's forbidden to take the fruit of knowledge given freely.
Truth vs lie represents a debate (reason) among gentiles about a jewish suggestion, while ignoring perceivable CHANGE.
Nature changes being...holding onto truth or lie ignores change. Adaptation to change requires free will of choice.
"And call no man your father upon the earth: for one is your Father, which is in heaven." ~Matthew 23:9
It's gentiles who believe that "the father of lies" is true, which in return permits each jew to shape a lie aka the contradiction of truth within change.
What happens if one applies change to truth? It becomes a lie, and vice versa.
Samuel (name of god) + Harris/harry/harjon (to lay waste, ravage, plunder)...
God gives sound...a jew articulates sound into words to trick gentiles into taking the name of god in vain, which in return permits each jew to lay waste; ravage, and plunder gentiles.
Glad you know about how bad this do nothing DEI female is too. Have upvote.