Nick Fuentes says don't read your bible, just listen to "clergy"
(www.youtube.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (64)
sorted by:
Back in the day when I red the Bible I became a convinced atheist. Almost as if a person needs to read Scripture through a correct paradigm to come to a correct interpretation. I wonder what that paradigm is? Could it perhaps be the institution established by the One that speaks through the text? Nah, that's a man-made tradition. Just read it in your closet and you'll definitely get everything right on your own. Your interpretation will most likely align with what at least one of the 10000 different sects teaches out there.
Assuming any of them is the true Church (spoiler alert: it is not because history) 10000 to 1 for being correct is not that bad I guess.
Ones perception...not the suggestion by another.
Script/skribh - "to cut, separate, sift"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/script
All perceivable separating each ones perception from one another implies the natural script...if one reads the written scripture by another, then one is tempted to ignore analysis (perceivable moving through perception) for synthesis (consent holding onto suggested).
Inspiration implies natural script; information implies artificial script...only oneself can discern this.
Correct vs incorrect aka a conflict of reason implies an artificial script run by others within oneself from outside.
God was before free will of choice was given to choose correct or incorrect from one another.
Implies the one within all who articulates natural sound into speech to distract one another.
The line (inception towards death) differentiates each interpreter (life) from one another...aligning with one another implies death to interpretation.
Differentiation implies analysis; alignment implies synthesis.