keep law
Law (Land; Air; Water) cannot be kept..nature gives (inception) and takes (death) from each being (life).
descendant of Abraham
Ab (father) raham (multitude)...God implies singularity, hence "And call no man your father upon the earth: for one is your Father, which is in heaven." ~Matthew 23:9
"An Hegel dran zu bleiben; vor der Schwierigkeit, seine Gedanken zu verstehen, nicht zu kapitulieren. Das war wahrscheinlich die weiseste Entscheidung in meinem Leben. Aber sie führte zur Vereinsamung. Ich denke jetzt anders als die „normalen" Menschen mit der Folge, daß die mich nicht mehr „verstehen". Ich kann das aber auch nicht wieder abstellen."
~Horst Mahler - 'Das Ende der Wanderschaft'
Translation for the lazy: "To persevere with Hegel; not to capitulate to the difficulty of understanding his thoughts. That was probably the wisest decision of my life." But it led to isolation. I now think differently than "normal" people, with the result that they no longer "understand" me. But I can't change that either."
US economy
a) Eco (environment; encircle the mind) + nomy/nem (to take)...if one takes, then one ignores all giving for free.
b) US (united states). Each being within nature implies "uni estate"...few invert this by artificially tempting many together into united states.
GDP (gross domestic product)
Each being within nature implies a domestic (inception towards death) product (life)...few suggest prices to shape the consensus of many into a gross domestic product. Consenting to a price implies by each ones FREE will of choice...buying into what another sells implies selling self out to another.
remote authority...Though Police.
Words (suggested information) shaped within sound (perceivable inspiration) permit remote authority and though policing if consented to.
we are allowing
Allowing implies all (perceivable) allotting each ones share (perception)...WE implies few casting many into lots to gain shareholder control. "we" the word aka suggested information tempting ones consent to hold onto it...implies the casting of a crafted spell.
We experience him always within limits and partially.
"We" implies the self imposed limit of manifold upon partiality. Starting a sentence with "we" ignores that ones sentience starts within singularity.
all is core unity
All generates each unit at core, hence with a heart/cordis/cor...
The Son is himself the "One" (the Unity) in the same way the Father is Unity; but he is "not alone"
Unit within way implies one within all aka "al-one"...
are given the concept two
Con (together) cept (to take) inverts given...it implies one taking from another one, while ignoring all given.
Transformation implies transfer of form (life) within action (inception towards death) aka everything moving becoming each thing matter.
"In the beginning..." implies being within generation...not the beginning of creation.
Begin aka BE (being) GIN/GEN (generation) implies the transformation of generation into generated being. END/ANT (front) implies being forwarded... https://www.etymonline.com/word/end
Sleight of hand: "Transformers...more than meets the eyes"
What of creatio ex Deo?
a) Only within Deo can ex ignore transformation for creation.
b) Deo cannot create, since it implies all. Deo transforms all into each ex-pressing one within.
If whole part, partially whole.
Notice that part-i-al implies "part within all"...using partially whole implies the doubling of all aka a contradiction.
That's why only within whole can there be any part-i-al.
Suggestion can be ignored.
What if ones (uni) together (com) makes it harder for anyone to perceive ignorance?
Also...to perceive from within a group, hides the one suggesting the formation of the group from ones perception.
The state: "How dare you use money for enterprise to kill innocents, while we use money as incentive to kill innocents"
At least they use adults
Like Nora Louise Kuzma aka Traci Lords... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Traci_Lords
want to be God
God implies need allowing one to want, hence giving choice towards (to) being (be).
it is not revealed if any creature can ever "be God" or not.
If any implies within all, then all reveals anyone within...others suggest creationism aka creatio ex nihilo (creation out of nothing) to tempt one to deny that.
Self is not God
How could a part within whole not also be whole?
In that sense perhaps anything is communicable
What if ones (uni) together (com) dulls ones sentience?
Travel is change.
Only within change can one travel..."is" implies holding onto something while ignoring change.
the power to change the (past)
Suggesting others to hold onto the past gives one the power to change it at will aka historical revisionism aka shaping fiction.
In reality...change (inception towards death) generates power (life). Power implies potential wielded by free will of choice...not anything achieved by possession.
want a multiverse
Nature implies singular need for each singular being within...want implies from one another, which establishes multiple buyers under a singular seller.
Universe implies one turning towards another (consent); multiverse implies many ones turned together (consensus)...only the chosen one shaping the suggestion is permitted to wield the power of both universe and multiverse.
Edit: Where does the Master of the Universe got his power from? "By the power of Greyskull I have the power". What's grey? An intermediary in-between white (discernment) and black (ignorance)... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7yeA7a0uS3A
The Smartest
"As of 2025, there are approximately 19.8 billion active IoT (internet of things) devices worldwide"...it's the gentile consensus to use a device (devil), which makes each gentile Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Realistic, and Time-bound aka SMART.
origin of civilization
ATION (action) implies the origin of each reaction within...a jew suggests civilism to domesticate each consenting gentile into a civilist.
Civilization falls because civilians ignore to react (life) to action (inception towards death)...the outcome is always the same; it's the origin which allows those within to be different.
why the USA is so great and powerful
Nature was always greater than any being within, and only within fill/fall (inception towards death) can there be power (life)...a jew UNITES the STATES of gentiles together to harvest the underutilized falling power by exploiting weak (being) within great (nature).
Solutions? Specificity?
Solution (inception towards death) generates specificity (life).
Companies to boycott?
Each others, because nature sets each being apart from one another.
Interesting articles with new takes?
a) Interest aka inter-esse (within essence) implies each being within nature.
b) Article implies the artificial inversion of natural.
c) Artificial "new" tempts one to ignore natural "now".
d) Taking from one another tempts one to ignore all given.
Ok we get it, the jews are bad mmmmkay… anything else?
a) If jews bad, then are gentiles good while ignoring jews for "anything else"?
b) Nature (all perceivable) generates being (ones perception)...anything else implies suggested fiction.
Now what?
It's asking for "new takes" which makes "now" questionable.
some of these nazi larpers are adl and 8200 agents
So ashke-nazi nazi-larpers?
The German language abbreviates by the first two letters...NAtional SOzialist aka naso, not nazi. Nazi aka ashke-nazi stems from the NAZI RIGHT aka NAZI RITE (nazarite; nazhir)... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nazirite
Be the change you wish to see
Being implies within (life) change (inception towards death)...to wish implies ignoring perceivable origin for suggested outcome aka corrupting ones sight.
alternative religion
How could one alternate while responding (re) to bondage (ligo)? Not much wiggle room...
self-castration
What if consent implies submission to another aka emasculation?
blood representing
While within a vessel?
Okay then
- Okay vs dissatisfying (circular reasoning)
- If/then (linear implication)
This contradiction corrupts ones perception of moving differences.
enabling forward grasping
Enabling ones free will of choice to grasp (want) or release (need).
Passing through inspiration implies information unheld
Inspiration passes through no matter how much information one helds or unhelds, yet the more information held, the less inspiration perceived aka the more pass through ignored.
analytical reproduction implies any synthesis is unheld (any conflict is ignored)
Ones responding perception within all perceivable produced implies reproduction...any synthesis held or unheld, and the resulting conflict of reason (held vs unheld) distracts perception from reproducing.
Reproducing implies adaption to process...not to product.
From the christian perspective...the seed within the soil, growing the tree into the fruit, which falls to the soil to spread the seed implies the process one needs to adapt to. Taking the fruit (of forbidden knowledge) into possession tempts one to ignore the process.
- Apple/apply - "to join; combine" aka a synthesis.
- Bite/bheid - "to split" aka an analysis.
Presence implies medium undistinguished
Presence given implies the opportunity to distinguish aka self discernment aka a growth potential...using the word "undistinguished" implies taking possession of loss aka defining self by what one isn't.
Medium/middle implies choice in-between...not what is being mediated as distinguished or undistinguished.
Singularity implies dualism disestablished.
Singularity implies the entirety of implication from if to then for each one within...including established or disestablished dualism (aka holding onto one another).
Choosing nihil implies not chosing
Choosing nihil implies choosing not...."not choosing" implies the circular inversion of ones straight thinking.
Nothing didn't exist before choice. Everything was before each thing gains the choice to bring nothing (denial of everything) into existence.
Choosing was given by nature to being..."not choosing" is suggested by a being to another, hence tricking each other to put nothing before choice.
Letting go implies emptying
a) Letting go implies all going letting each one within choose how to respond.
b) Empty implies a measurement taken by one within all. Even if one "empties" suggested information out of ones mind/memory, all perceivable inspiration always fulfills mind (fulfillment)...it's just that the former tempts one to ignore already being fulfilled within all given.
spirit let go lets go of existence
Ones ex-stance implies expressing choice standing in-between impressing balance (spirit). Impression aka action (ion) pressing (press) into (im) reaction implies being "spirited away".
a word behind thee
That's a word a being left behind and chose not to hold onto.
he way, walk ye in it
That's the sound moving through each ones mind structured within (in-stru-ment).
when ye turn to the right hand, and when ye turn to the left...
...then ye ignore linear progression.
oil
Aka oil/all, hence s-oil implying the split of all into each seed (seeing division)...
What does each imply?
One (partial) within oneness (whole) aka each unit.
Addition implies ones inception; subtraction implies ones death; multiplication implies ones intercourse with one another; division implies being one within oneness.
Measuring isn't necessary for nature to work, yet each native within tempts each other to ignore that.
Rise during fall?
Living potential during process of dying.
Inhale and exhale alternate
Check this out... https://www.etymonline.com/word/alternate
- Alternate..."by turns"
- Alternative..."offering choice"
What if nature offers each being choice during linear progression? Notice that any -ism a jew suggests tempts gentiles to alternate between two, while ignoring that there's only one alternative.
Example: moralism (good vs bad alternation). The alternative...all offering one free will of choice.
Strange
Breathing implies nature moving through each native...resuscitation represents strange (foreign).
What prevents cause?
a) The question itself implies something other than cause aka a contradiction.
b) Prevent aka pre (before) venire (to come)...not a suggested hindrance, but coming into being within forwarding motion.
What prevents cause? Nothing aka not a thing aka vacuum aka nihil, suggesting resistance.
Nothing implies effect denying cause for affection aka one thing denying everything for one another. Resistance implies each ones responding stance within all and among the temptation of one another.
Resistance isn't about preventing cause, but resisting one another's tempting affection. Matter within motion needs to resist the wanted temptation to hold onto other matter.
Does one require measuring another?
Mentally holding onto any measurement contradicts the distance measured during the process of separation.
Even simpler...measuring implies in-between two, which contradicts the one measuring.
If one does not measure another, does one perceive one?
One perceives one another as moving differences...holding onto measurements tempts one to ignore the "moving". The held onto measurements are then used to established artificial likeness among natural differences.
Does letting go of measuring let go of perceiving?
Perceivable cannot be held onto...only suggested. If life cannot perceive its inception and death, then any measurements taken are based on artificial beginning and end.
Example...a race from start to finish ignores that one had to be alive to start it, and continue to live to finish it. Now try to apply "racing to be the fastest" with life being moved from inception towards death while racing to be the fastest...
What is reproduction without synthesis?
It's holding onto the synthetic which corrupts reproduction, not the existence of synthesis. The conflict (with vs without) represents the synthesis one ignores analytical reproduction for aka ones response to all nature produces.
If one and another analyze and resist synthesis, how can that re-pair (reproduce)?
One AND another implies the synthesis one didn't resisted. Analysis implies each ones perception within all perceivable.
Action winging through reaction implies re-perpetuation (re-flex perpetuation). Synthesis?
Through implies a separation (analysis)...it's the separated partial which needs to resist the wanted temptation to hold onto information, while ignoring the passing through inspiration.
The flexing represents motion bending matter apart from one another, and perpetuation implies cause (inception towards death) to endure (life), hence the suffering.
Singular wing?
Choice (bird) within balance (wing)...balance isn't two sides; but one process for each potential bird within.
Example...a fallen (inception towards death) angel (life) loosing ones wings (balance). Angle/angle/ang - "to bend".
Light (E-M aka I AM)
Light 'em up...
past is future, distinguished by their medium between
Distinguished by each ones PRESENCE, while the measurements (past; present; future) are mediated by another. If one consents to suggested mediation, then one ignores to distinguish as medium.
cooperate like inhale/exhale
What each different potential inhales/exhales implies the same process...others suggest likeness and cooperation to tempt possession.
Implying dualism aka ignorance of all?
Replace good and bad with ones choice within all to hold onto either side...it's ones choice of either side which establishes duality, and thereby ignorance of all singularity.
If good is existence and bad is nonexistence
Existence implies ones choice within balance...others suggest imbalance (good vs bad) to tempt non-existence aka ones denial.
Balance was before choice came into being...what is good or bad is being suggested afterwards.
kenosis
Nosis implies ones perception within all perceivable. Kenos (empty aka containing nothing) implies ones de-nial of perceivable for suggested nihil-ism.
Ones memory/mind holding onto suggested information becomes the container of nothing aka revolving information within ones mind, while denying the inspiration moves through.
a) Rule 1: Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person.
b) Was Ford a spammer for publishing The Dearborn Independent and The International jew?
c) Was Jesus a spammer for denouncing the Pharisees?
d) Guess who thinks spam (spiced ham) isn't kosher?
What's less destructive to him...exposing himself or continue to permit a jew to hold exposure over him? What if it wasn't about telling others, but about letting go from within self?
Notice furthermore that he disclosed himself abusing his cousin, yet not who abused him beforehand...
established for ever
Aka ever forwarding (inception towards death) each temporal establish-ment (life)...a process of separation. Tikkun olam inverts this process by tempting the established (life) forwards (inception towards death) by artificially putting together what nature separates.
Christian covenant concept
Christ implies "anointed one" aka the process of anointing each one during separation from one another...covenants and concepts imply a suggested synthesis.
- Covenant aka com (together) venire (to come)... https://www.etymonline.com/word/covenant
- Concept aka com (together) capere (to take)... https://www.etymonline.com/word/concept
Concept and Covenant imply anti-christ...
If jews have mishandled it
a) Chosen one implies singular..."jews" implies a suggested plurality inverting ones singular perception.
b) Nature sets each being apart from one another (to christen)...a jew tempts gentiles with concepts and covenants to come and take together. It's a gentiles consent to concepts and covenants which mishandles the natural state of being.
not the fault of the concept
Concept implies suggested temptation...consenting to it puts one at fault for falling for a temptation.
Only during failure/fault/fall (inception towards death) can one rise (life).
Will all be again?
You already answered yourself in the question, yet lacking self discernment... "will be again" aka "a gain of being will".
Only one within all can be again and again and again...all implies ongoing; one implies temporal.
Does self imply all moving through one with all moving through others?
Replace all with "cause" and each one with "effect", then ask yourself what could prevent cause from moving through each internal effect?
One within all, others within all, no "others than others"?
"Other" implies ones measurement of one another. All doesn't require to be measured by anyone within, since all implies one for each one within aka the internal division of singularity (cause) into each single unit (effect).
What if holding onto others "affects" an effect to ignore cause? Notice then that an "off-spring" cannot be held onto, which is why the perpetuation of self requires letting go.
Is "repair" suggestion or inspiration?
Re (to respond) perre (to produce) implies all producing each responding one within...others suggest that repair means putting together what's broken aka tikkun olam (repairing the world by bringing together).
Inspiration implies analysis; suggestion tempts synthesis...it's ones free will of choice to resist latter for former. Without ones consent to the suggestion of another there would be no synthesis. Me writing about this implies analysis; your consent to my analysis implies synthesis...unless you choose to resist.
Per aka through, petu- aka pter- to wing, -ation aka action, implies action winging through.
Through what? Reaction! Wing (inception towards death) moving through bird (life) aka action (motion) winging through (momentum) reaction (matter).
Sun's wings are rays aka past line and future line.
Past and future are measurements taken by a ray, while ignoring light given. Light generates a spectrum within which each ray divides from one another...the spectrum represents the singular wing.
Inception moving through life towards death are not "two wings", but one momentum for each medium (middle) of matter in-between.
Others suggest left-wing vs right-wing conflicts to turn two sides against one another...an inversion of nature. Notice that ones SIGHT (life) cannot see ones SIDES (inception/death), because inception towards death implies a singular line of progress; not two conflicting sides.
Balance generates choice not to hold onto either side, but to balance at center aka temporary adapting to ongoing change, not holding onto this, while fight that to protect this.
Good can never destroy bad, nor could bad ever destroy good...one can destroy both sides by choosing to hold onto neither, but only for oneself.
Choosing to let go of past and future changes suggested PRESENT into perceiving PRESENCE.
a) Nature doesn't orate...any rhetoric was shaped artificially to distract from nature.
b) Taking debate (the bait) gets one caught...
c) Known cannot be claimed since it moves.
Why do people like...
Being implies person (singular)...a jew suggests pluralism (people) to establish a consensus among "like-minded" gentiles. Why? Because being within nature implies differences within sameness...likeness distorts differentiation.
Michael Jackson
- Before the JQ..."It doesn't matter if you're black or white"
- After the JQ..."Kick me; kike me; don't you black or white me"
Are they insane?
Each being implies insane (in sanus; within sound) person (per sonos; by sound)...holding onto pluralism (they) represents the mental distortion within each singular being.
A chosen one cannot be more than a singular...
Helter Skelter
Helter-Skelter (to hasten-to scatter) aka progressivism + dispensationalism...a jew utilizes the former to tempt gentiles to hasten towards the end of life, while using the latter to grow self within diaspora.
Only dispersed (apart) can an off-spring grow...
Why is there so much censorship
To corrupt the censor/sensor/sense of a seagoing (inception towards death) vessel (life).
Nature reveals...artifice is utilized to conceal.
As in deutsch/dutch/dish aka yid-dish (jew-ish)...