It's mocking people that ask for basic evidence to substantiate the claims of Jesus resurrecting from the dead. The Jews look for miracles to establish someone as credible in what they claim. The Greeks look for logical argument to verify claims. Paul's argument basically amounts to just believe what he says on blind faith cuz that's what God wants.
The jews look for miracles to establish someone as credible in what they claim.
A jew shapes a suggestion to tempt gentiles to claim the suggested by giving creed/credit to it. Miracle implies the jewish sales-pitch for the suggested, which amazes the minds of gentiles into wanting to claim by giving credit.
A jew knows that all perceivable moves through each ones perception and cannot be claimed, nor does it require credit/creed to utilize ones "free" will of choice.
Yes vs no implies a conflict of reason against another, and circular logic within self based on ones consent to suggested logos (words). That's infiltration of perception.
Consenting to anything suggested permits infiltrators to set parameters for ones thoughts aka mind-control aka govern-ment.
Holding onto suggested establishes circular thinking, which in return prevents ones perception to think straight, hence from within (life) a line (inception towards death).
I see no problem here. What is your issue with this?
It's mocking people that ask for basic evidence to substantiate the claims of Jesus resurrecting from the dead. The Jews look for miracles to establish someone as credible in what they claim. The Greeks look for logical argument to verify claims. Paul's argument basically amounts to just believe what he says on blind faith cuz that's what God wants.
A jew shapes a suggestion to tempt gentiles to claim the suggested by giving creed/credit to it. Miracle implies the jewish sales-pitch for the suggested, which amazes the minds of gentiles into wanting to claim by giving credit.
A jew knows that all perceivable moves through each ones perception and cannot be claimed, nor does it require credit/creed to utilize ones "free" will of choice.
Yes we do filter everything through our perception. Our free will of choice is within the parameters of our perception and thoughts.
Yes vs no implies a conflict of reason against another, and circular logic within self based on ones consent to suggested logos (words). That's infiltration of perception.
Consenting to anything suggested permits infiltrators to set parameters for ones thoughts aka mind-control aka govern-ment.
Holding onto suggested establishes circular thinking, which in return prevents ones perception to think straight, hence from within (life) a line (inception towards death).