"CIRCLES AND 'CIRCULAR' ARE EVIL AND BAD AND I HATE AND AVOID THEM!!!!!"
a) Circle/kikel/kike...
b) What's the narrative given for the "kike" slur? Ellis Island... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kike So drawing a circle to rebel against the cross aka being (life) moved a-cross (inception towards death) aka circular rebellion against linear progression.
Now ask yourself why New York has an ELLIS (eliyahu; my god is yahweh) island, and why migrants would rebel entering the land of the free?
The letter O is circular too
Letter implies ones use of free will of choice to LET another shape LETTERS into artificial words, while ignoring that motion>momentum (balance)>matter (choice) implies linear progression...not circular logic about suggested logos (words).
in every reply I can find
a) Reply implies each...not every.
b) Reply implies a reaction; find (foundation) implies action. Whatever a being seeks to find...nature implies the foundation to find everything offered. The issue is that each being can be deceived with findings from one another, which implies a fief/feud - "possession, holding, domain; feudal duties, payment"
your very name
a) Name/nombre/number implies designation of a unit/unus - "one"...there can be only one, no matter how many names one attaches to oneself.
b) Notice that "free-will-of-choice" doesn't represent ones name, but ones free will of choice to name/label/brand. That's why going against someone called "free-will-of-choice" always backfires against oneself.
the word "choice"
Choosing the word (suggested), while ignoring sound (perceivable)...binds ones choice to a chosen one.
a) Circle/kikel/kike...
b) What's the narrative given for the "kike" slur? Ellis Island... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kike So drawing a circle to rebel against the cross aka being (life) moved a-cross (inception towards death) aka circular rebellion against linear progression.
Now ask yourself why New York has an ELLIS (eliyahu; my god is yahweh) island, and why migrants would rebel entering the land of the free?
Letter implies ones use of free will of choice to LET another shape LETTERS into artificial words, while ignoring that motion>momentum (balance)>matter (choice) implies linear progression...not circular logic about suggested logos (words).
a) Reply implies each...not every.
b) Reply implies a reaction; find (foundation) implies action. Whatever a being seeks to find...nature implies the foundation to find everything offered. The issue is that each being can be deceived with findings from one another, which implies a fief/feud - "possession, holding, domain; feudal duties, payment"
a) Name/nombre/number implies designation of a unit/unus - "one"...there can be only one, no matter how many names one attaches to oneself.
b) Notice that "free-will-of-choice" doesn't represent ones name, but ones free will of choice to name/label/brand. That's why going against someone called "free-will-of-choice" always backfires against oneself.
Choosing the word (suggested), while ignoring sound (perceivable)...binds ones choice to a chosen one.