what would the natural application of natural analysis look like?
a) Look/lock implies holding onto; like implies differences synthesized together...it's all perceivable separating each ones perception, which allows one to analyze what others synthesize.
b) Apply; verb - "join or combine" aka a synthesis. Ation/action implies separation into reaction aka analysis.
It's your consent to the suggested word "application" which hides analysis (cation) within synthesis (apply)...you are choosing to artificially hold together what nature sets apart from one another. I can analyze this, but not take apart your synthesis.
What would it be called?
It wouldn't. Putting a label onto something implies a synthesis...being one thing within everything implies an analytical process. You answering the call, you questioning others what to call, any you holding onto the called label...that's what inverts analysis into synthesis.
Perhaps something like “the Way”?
a) What does way (inception towards death) imply? Wanderer (life)...not a likeness, but internal differentiation aka the inert power you wrote about.
b) Perhaps implies by happenstance aka by chance. Being implies choice given by balance...only then can choice take a chance, which once again implies an inversion.
c) Being implies one thing within everything (analysis)...something implies the sum of things together (synthesis).
Or even “free will”?
Balance (even) gives and takes free will of choice (odd)...that's how nature evens the odds of being. It's OR (either, else, otherwise, as an alternative or substitute) which another exploits to tempt choice at odds with one another.
Taking the chance of even or odds implies gambling ones choice away. Only within even can there be odd..."or" inverts that.
clay mixed with straw
Putting ingredients together isn't compression? Put clay+straw in one hand and a brick in the other...which one looks compressed?
unless you count
If one counts, then one can be held accountable...another compression, this one preventing expression outwards.
baked
If flow (inception towards death) generates form (life), then how do heat (living) and cold (dying) work?
What do call them digging out
Digging out reveals...calling conceals by labeling. Nature reveals; few utilize artificial labels to conceal nature from many.
Call; verb - "to summon; invoke"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/call
True, even...
True and false are at odds with one another. Change implies even, which alters into each ones different choice, which then can choose to put true and false at odds with one another.
ideas of technology
Techno/tekhnē (artifice) logy (logic; circular thinking)...the ideas another suggests become artificial idols within oneself, which then shapes true or false circular thinking.
Nature implies linear progression; each being within a potential to shape form.
innate powers
Aka power native within energy...a process of internal separation (analysis), which holding onto ideals/idols inverts (synthesis).
Technology implies the synthetic inversion of natural analysis.
massive blocks
How does one make a brick? Compression. What's the opposite of compression? Rarefaction aka expanding a body of matter during motion.
first layer
First implies foundation...only thereupon can something be layered. Motion implies the foundation for any layer of matter.
I attribute
I implies taking; attribute implies giving. Only nature gives (inception) and takes (death) from each being (life). If one ignores the latter, then another can exploit the former to shape the growth of ones perception.
"linked" is not synonymous with causes
a) There can be only one cause for each effect within...another suggests causes (plural) to tempt one (singular) to ignore cause for affection aka linking ones consent to the suggestion of another.
b) Consenting to any suggestion establishes a synonymous consensus among different beings within the same nature.
Virus that over 95 percent of us carry
a) US (plural) represents the virus that each one (singular) holding onto it carries. Nature sets each being apart from one another...us (united states) has to be artificially carried among one another.
b) Over 95% includes 100%, hence each one (singular) who consents to suggested us (plural)...
c) If all perceivable flows through each ones formed perception, then holding onto suggested pluralism (us) implies a poisonous fluid injected into form aka a virus.
Holly Large...
...implies whole larger than small partial. Suggesting "us" or "we" implies the summation of small partials within a larger whole.
biochemistry
Aka bio (life) + chemy (to pour; cause to flow) aka flow (inception towards death) pouring form (life).
What's hidden...bioLOGIC ALchemy. Logic implies circular thinking aka artificially pouring together (pollution) what nature pours (purification) apart.
If one pollutes during a process of purification, then one dilutes self...perceivable flowing through formed perception implies purification; suggested held by consent implies pollution. That's how brainwashing works.
fool God
a) God implies fool/fall for anything rising within.
b) Fool/bhel - "to blow" implies God blowing spirit through each being.
Origin of what?
Origin of each thing coming out within it.
No, every...
Why put nothing before everything?
Genesis describes
De (to divide) scribe/skribh (to cut)...reading a description implies affixing by connecting.
If origin (genesis) divides (describes), then describing genesis tempts the divided to affix (logic) and connect (reason).
Nope, everyone does it.
a) Again putting nothing before everything...
b) One cannot be every...only each. Every implies the sum of each aka artificially putting together what nature separates from one another.
c) A being cannot do...only nature does, which allows each being within to re-do self aka to respond to being (life) done (inception towards death).
Even if so, is that a bad thing?
a) Even (inception towards death) generates odd (life)...a jew tempts gentiles at odds with one another to even them out.
b) Nature WAS perceivable before one can suggest what it IS.
c) Good and bad are in conflict against one another...each thing within everything implies apart from one another aka not in conflict against one another unless ignored.
d) Choosing good or bad puts gentiles at odds against one another within so called conflicts of reason.
Strawman. What sentience is supposedly "ignored"??
a) Inception SENTENCES life towards point of death, hence giving each being SENTIENCE...what a jew tempts gentiles to ignore with rhetorical points is self discernment, which one cannot get from one another.
b) What if words can only be shaped within sound, wouldn't that make any argument through words a straw man fallacy that tempts one to ignore the distinction through sound?
Example...good vs bad reasoning represents a straw man fallacy ignoring implication (if/then) of natural change. As in...holding onto either good or bad tempts one to ignore that nature changes.
No one is burdened by anything here.
What if NO aka nothing aka suggested nihil-ism tempting ones de-nial of perceivable for suggested implies a self imposed burden?
How could not being able to discern in-between everything perceivable and suggested nothingness not burden one?
Examples for "nothing" originating from a jew...
- Seinfeld selling nothing... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EQnaRtNMGMI
- Creatio ex nihilo (creation out of nothing)... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creatio_ex_nihilo
- "Beause it's the deepest impulse of a jewish soul to pull at the very fabric of life until there's nothing left but a thread. They want nothing but nothingness. Nothingness without end"... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZRUjy1Dhx-k
Withdrawing into self"????
Perceivable inspiration inspires one to draw from, while moving through one...suggested information is drawn by others and held within self. The latter tempts one to ignore the former.
Plato's cave represents holding onto information within mind/memory, while ignoring inspiration passing through. Cave/keue - "to swell"...which is what information does to memory aka growing in bulk, which is how a jew collectivizes gentiles with suggested information by establishing consensus within memory.
MY discernment
My implies taking into possession by holding onto; dis-cern implies the division of perception...the former implies synthesis; the latter analysis.
The origin of my implies I AM (je suit; jesus), which brands everyone else into YOU ARE (jew are; judah)...
clearly better
Better implies versus worse...conflict doesn't clear; it obscures.
What I wrote describes origin. A jew utilizes labels to tempt gentiles to seek outcomes like "your point". This inversion of ignoring ones sentience for points made by another is why a jew uses names as label/libel.
Label implies "to affix"; libel implies "to charge"...asking for a point implies affixing by withdrawing into self when getting the point aka a charged burden upon self.
The holocaust narrative distracts one from being caust (life) within holo (inception towards death)...which requires self discernment, not others making points for one.
Nostra Aetate (in our time)
Nostra (our) as in Cosa Nostra aka kosher nostra...
a) Ferdinand (to fare; travel; pass-over) + Helena (the bright one) aka the bright one (life) passing over (inception towards death) the burned offering...
b) Josef (to add) and Marta (to rebel) aka each life resisting the process of dying.
c) I have to cross (inception towards death) you (life) out...
Why in Revelation is it a female
a) Motion (male) > momentum (female) > matter (trans-formed off-spring in-between)
b) RE (responding matter) VELA (veil of momentum) TION (motion revealing)
c) Male (seed) > female (soil) > offspring (fruit)
Exopsychology.. how we used to be cavemen
a) Logy aka circular logic represents the cave of ones mind ignoring psyche aka natures linear progression.
b) Exo (outer) tempts one to ignore being intro (inner)...those who use exopsychology lure others into ignorance (inner cave), while studying them from outside.
how will we evolve
Evolving implies unrolling...being implies straightening (inception towards death) out (life) from within. Will implies an inner expression outwards, which others invert into an outer repression (reason) inwards (logic).
just normal evolution
Few suggest norms to roll (volvere) many into a consensus. Norm/gnōmōn - "carpenter's square"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/norm which is how a freemason uses norms (square) to roll consensus together (compass).
It's like what the jews called Goyim...
A jewish suggestion represents a calling...consenting to it makes gentiles alike one another. It's the suggestion from outside controlling consensus from within, which shapes the golem/goyim.
how Aleister Crowley was a respected influence
Re-spec implies ones response to either natural (perception) or artificial (suggestion) influence...Aleister Crowley got his respect from those ignoring natural for artificial, just like any other influencer suggesting information.
When things change faster than our native capacity, we loose coherence.
Change enables capacity, but one needs to resist the wanted temptation thereof...otherwise one ignores change (perceivable inspiration) for whatever one contains (suggested information).
Coherence is based on consensus about capacity, while ignoring that change destroys coherence. One cannot hold within capacity without ignoring change, yet what one contains tempts one by consensus with others to continue to ignore change.
spiritual warfare
Being implies a spiritual fare aka passage from inhale to exhale...war implies one side against another, while ignoring passage.
War (circular conflict) contradicts fare (linear progression).
2WAI
An inversion of there can be (life) only one way (inception towards death).
avatar
Ones consent to any suggestion of another implies the "concrete embodiment of something abstract" aka an avatar. The suggested only exists as an abstract body within ones mind for as long as on consensual holds onto it.
Controlling consensus through the use of abstracts implies an animated anthropomorphic being in jewish folklore aka a golem/goyim... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golem
One thing is not like the other.
Suggesting what one thing is tempts one another into an alike consensus about what it is. Nature only every WAS perceivable before any being within can suggest one another what one thing IS.
math; science; retard?
Consenting to suggested mathematics and scientism retards ones mind, because nature moves and cannot be affixed by measurement or methodology.
...was a sex offender
Only nature offers sex/seco (to divide) by dividing each being within from one another.
humiliation ritual
Ritual/rite - "to move within a straight line"...nature implies arrogance (inception towards death); each being within implies humble (life). Self discernment requires humble to resist the temptation of arrogance...not showing humility to one another's suggested rites.
straight on TV ad
Ad aka advertisement aka ad (toward) vertere (to turn)...there cannot be anything straight, while ones mind is turned.
straight couple
Straight implies direct; couple implies indirect aka coupled opposites.
sober
Sober/sobre - "moderate in desires or actions"...only nature acts; each being reacts by free will of choice either to nature (perception) or one another's desires (suggestion).
Moderate implies "not excessive in amount"...if ONE consents to any suggestion of another ONE, then ONE excesses the amount of ONEself by a chosen ONE.
Consensus implies immodesty...free will of choice implies moderation.
important to determine
To determine implies to fix the bounds of...import implies export aka an ongoing transfer in-between.
why Jesus was Crucified
If one determines by fixing the bounds of self as I AM (je suis; jesus), then ones mind gets stuck on the transfer ACROSS (cruci/crux) in-between (life) import (inception) and export (death).
I AM (jesus) gets crucified whenever ACROSS (a cross) meets DENIAL (the nail). Others suggest the story of jesus being nailed to the cross to distract one from self discernment by storing stories within mind/memory, which corrupts dis-cernere (mental analysis).
year
Year implies "a full round of seasons; the interval between equinoxes"...
a) Nature moves each being (life) linear (inception towards death)...not circular.
Linear movement of matter implies transference (German Übertragung), which Sigismund Schlomo Freud corrupted from a transference from nature through each being to a transference of being to being... https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C3%9Cbertragung_(Psychoanalyse)
All perceivable moving through each ones perception implies linear transference...ones consent to any suggestion of another implies circular transference inwards (logic) and outwards (reason).
b) Suggested equinox (equal night) tempts one to ignore that ones perception within all perceivable implies different ray within equal light...it's ones consent to the suggestion of another, which equalizes consensus into darkness (ignorance), while ignoring light (discernment).
c) Season aka SEA (phonetic to see) SON (sonos; sound)...sound represents the sleight of hand for those with eyes to SEE to utilize phonetic upon SEA.
- All our times have come (as suggested by another)
- Here (ones perception), but now (all perceivable) they're gone
- Seasons don't fear the reaper
- Love of two (ones consent to the suggestion of another) is one (ones perception within all perceivable).
https://www.azlyrics.com/lyrics/blueoystercult/dontfearthereaper.html
Romeo (to roam) + Juliet (to shine)...a forbidden love, since holding onto one another contradicts the sending forth of light.
scientific analysis
Scientific aka scientia + ficus...putting those together implies a synthesis. Scientia implies all perceivable moving through each ones "sentient" perception, while ficus implies shaping perceivable into suggestible. Holding onto suggestible makes ones sentience oblivious to perceivable.
- Zalk...a jewish name from Lithuania, most likely a pet form of the Yiddish personal name Zalkind (see Salkin).
- Salkin...jewish (Ashkenazic): from the Yiddish personal name Zalkind, derived from Salomon.
I don't follow that line of thinking
"Don't" implies circular reasoning (do vs don't), which prevents a straight line of thinking.
God implies "doing everything"...others suggest "doing nothing" to invert that within ones mind.
I am hidden with The I Am, by the Anointed One
a) God reveals all through each...it's ones free will of choice to hide from revelation within ignorance.
b) Before one can take possession as "I Am"...all processes each ones potential apart from one another. As in...one couldn't take if all wasn't giving one being to take.
All was before one came into being, and "I Am" implies a being ignoring what was given by taking possession over self as I AM (jesus), which brands any other as YOU ARE (judah).
c) The separation of all into each one implies anointment aka coming into being as anointed one...a revelation; not something hidden.
Who Is The Saviour
I AM (jesus) implies taking possession into mind/memory aka saving it, which corrupting anointment (christ). God implies motion aka revelation of matter, which cannot be saved since it moves.
He has brought me to Himself and there I am hid.
Bringing implies revelation...only within all can one be free from one another. Bringing into being implies separation (anointment) from one another.
One cannot be hidden...only hiding discernment underneath ignorance of all given.
He welcomes
He implies God; welcome implies each one within coming into well/will...by anointment (christening) from one another.
even those
Even implies God giving balance; those implies each ones choice within being at odds with one another.
He loved us first.
He aka God aka first implies "giving"...love vs hate or us vs them implies "taking" a side against one another, while ignoring all given.
The creation by design is lower than The Creator
Design implies "division of sight" aka God giving sight to each divided one within...consenting to suggested creation-ism shapes the one suggesting into a creator who can re-design ones thought at will.
The Most High Name
A name can only be the most high, because it slaps a label on anything UNDERNEATH. God implies sound giving instruments the potential to shape names...taking that potential into possession by branding anything with a name ignores God, hence the conflict about giving God a name.
Sound cannot be named without contradicting flow (sound) with form (word)...but contradiction can be "saved" within memory for a while.
gives us free will of choice
US implies "united states"...that contradicts free aka each separated state freed from one another.
A plural can only wield free will of choice from within confinement to one another...that ain't free, but a contradiction like "I freely choose this prison food over that prison food".
the only One who can love us
US (plural) contradicts ONLY ONE (singular)...God implies singularity; not plurality.
Your conspiracy?
YOUR aka YOU ARE (judah) based on claiming self as I AM (je suis; jesus)...
Perhaps that some jews betrayed Jesus?
a) Jesus (i am) betrays Christ (anointed one) by taking into possession what a process divides into potential...Judah (you are) was shaped by Jesus (i am) while betraying Christ.
b) Another layer of deception...BE (being) TRAY (to transfer) AL (all) aka all (motion) transferring (momentum) each one (matter).
Be-tray-al implies the status quo of coming into being aka of being christened...an analytical process. A jew suggests loyalty to invert it into a synthesis. If a gentile consents to be LOYAL, then a jew becomes ROYAL.
Loyalty (slave) implies the origin of royalty (master)...
Judas is the Image of the jewish people
a) If I AM (je suis; jesus), then YOU ARE (jew dah, judah)...that's the fictitious exploit.
b) In reality...if each represents an anointed one (christ) aka separated from one another, then consenting to one another's suggestion shapes another into a chosen one, and self into an anti-christ.
Judaism, since Christ, is a corruption
The corruption of ignorance within each christ (anointed one), who selects another (chosen one) over self.
All gives each anointed one free will of choice...choosing to select another inverts ones choice into a chosen one, while turning self against (anti) anointment (christ).
Before one can select another, one has to claim self as I AM (jesus), which brands any other into a YOU ARE (judah).
If potential (life) during process (inception towards death) takes self into possession, then ones DE NIAL (the nail) of being moved ACROSS (a cross) can be exploited by another.
be restored
If a being (be) responds (re) to storage (stored), then that implies a burdening of self during the natural process of relieving burden aka setting being free.
former condition
a) ION implies action aka flow (inception towards death) generating reacting form (life). Only within flow can form come into being.
b) CON (together) DITI/DEIK (to show by speech) tempts one to ignore that flow separates form apart from one another.
c) CON implies gentiles together; DITI implies each jew apart showing gentiles to come together; ION implies God ignored by gentiles, which each jew exploits.
agcom
Aka com-uni-ism by centralized control (Centro direzionale).
They will have to...
Communism tricks the singular (uni) to join the plural (com) willingly.
Will implies singular...only if one ignores ones free will of choice for a suggested plural, can a chosen one speak in the name of the plural (they) to command (com) the singular (uni).
agcom influencers
A (authority) G (guaranty) COM (together)...that's fiction.
In reality...form (life) implies in-fluence (inception towards death), which authorizes form and guaranties outcome.
Author/autor/aug - "father; originator; instigator; one who brings about; to increase" ...that implies the process of dying fathering; originating; instigating; bringing about and increasing each potential life within, which guaranties that inception sentences life towards point of death.
The registry will also be partially public
a) Partially implies apart from one another, while public implies together with one another...a contradiction.
b) The registry of a being aka ones mind/memory can be tricked to willingly hold onto a contradiction like partially (singular) public (plural)...yet not without destroying oneself (logic), while fighting one another (reason).
c) Re (to respond) gistry/gestere (to carry)...a self imposed burden for oneself and a gest/jest for another aka a funny exploit.
Require(ment) implies a mental inquiry among humans during the natural synthesis of each being from one another. Ones response to such inquiries represents the synthesis.
Flow directs linear...form (life) grows up (living) and down (dying) during linear flow. Only during linear flow can formed heat flow down, and formed water flow up and vice versa.
Will can only come into being within natures outward balance...keeping anything imbalances ones will.
Another inversion...actual through initial (inception) towards ultimate (death). That's how a reaction comes into being.
Structure implies in-between roof/foundation aka as above/so below...that separation implies natural analysis, which translates to self discernment. Whatever one artificially synthesizes tempts one to hold onto it, while ignoring natural analysis.
Notice how many seek shelter from rain under a roof, yet how few leave the shelter when the rain ends...the temptation to artificially shelter grows exponentially unless resisted.
Notice furthermore that each infant gets exposed to lack of shelter, and that each elder gets exposed despite of shelter.