Maybe “what do the stars sing for”?
The sage as astronomer: "as long as you still experience the stars as something "above you" you lack the eyes of knowledge"
~Friedrich Nietzsche
The more you look around, the more you realize that the majority of people are just empty shells
What if ones expressed growth would fill ones surroundings with the fruits of ones labors? What if there's a choice to fill (need) or drain (want) ones surrounding?
Added a little more in an edit...
Everything is already perceivable, everyone requires a moment (um) to comprehend more of it...
Truth in the world and the attempts of {some} to manipulate that status
a) "attempt" implies a temporary (partial) and manipulating temporary implies within the momentum of ongoing (whole).
b) "manipulation" implies manual (living) within automatic (process of dying) aka reaction within enacting.
c) suggested STATUS - "legal standing of a person" tempts one to ignore the perceivable flow-state representing ones laid constitution aka LAW, noun [Latin lex; from the root of lay; law is that which is laid, set or fixed, like statute, constitution.]
Perceivable represents the laid law, suggested represents the fixed law..."maritime admiralty law" utilizes the laid law (maritime) underneath the fixed law (admiralty) and the trick used represents AD'MIRAL, noun (Heb. to speak) aka the affixed word over the flow of sound.
"all truth is relative” == “no truth is absolute”
a) RELA'TE, verb [Latin relatus, refero; re and fero, to produce.]...perceivable nature represents the only producer, which implies that every suggested (artificial) truth within is a product of nature, hence relative.
One is tempted to ignore nature as the relative producer of everything, when consenting to suggested "relativism", which the one suggesting it the perceived producer thereof, hence artificial suggestion masquerading as perceivable nature.
b) AB'SOLUTE, adjective - "complete in itself" implies the whole, not the suggested truth by any of the partial ones within. Suggesting others that something is absolute, tempts one to ignore being the partial among partials within the absolute whole.
“all that is unholy is holy”
a) all that is....is....no matter what each one within suggests other ones it to be.
b) HO'LY, adjective - "whole" + UN - "deprivation of"...it's the partial (growth) within the whole (loss) which can perceive loss (deprivation of growth), yet comprehension about growth coexisting within loss needs to be grown first, hence self discernment required for reassembly of comprehension.
Added a little more in an edit...
Everything is already perceivable, everyone requires a moment (um) to comprehend more of it...
Truth in the world and the attempts of {some} to manipulate that status
a) "attempt" implies a temporary (partial) and manipulating temporary implies within the momentum of ongoing (whole).
b) "manipulation" implies manual (living) within automatic (process of dying) aka reaction within enacting.
c) suggested STATUS - "legal standing of a person" tempts one to ignore the perceivable flow-state representing ones laid constitution aka LAW, noun [Latin lex; from the root of lay; law is that which is laid, set or fixed, like statute, constitution.]
Perceivable represents the laid law, suggested represents the fixed law..."maritime admiralty law" utilizes the laid law (maritime) underneath the fixed law (admiralty) and the trick used represents AD'MIRAL, noun (Heb. to speak) aka the affixed word over the flow of sound.
"all truth is relative” == “no truth is absolute”
a) RELA'TE, verb [Latin relatus, refero; re and fero, to produce.]...perceivable nature represents the only producer, which implies that every suggested (artificial) truth within is a product of nature, hence relative.
One is tempted to ignore nature as the relative producer of everything, when consenting to suggested "relativism", which the one suggesting it the perceived producer thereof, hence artificial suggestion masquerading as perceivable nature.
b) AB'SOLUTE, adjective - "complete in itself" implies the whole, not the suggested truth by any of the partial ones within. Suggesting others that something is absolute, tempts one to ignore being the partial among partials within the absolute whole.
“all that is unholy is holy”
a) all that is....is....no matter what each one within suggests other ones it to be.
b) HO'LY, adjective - "whole" + UN - "deprivation of"...it's the partial (growth) within the whole (loss) which can perceive loss (deprivation of growth), yet comprehension about growth coexisting within loss needs to be grown first, hence self discernment required for reassembly of comprehension.
Added a little more in an edit...
Everything is already perceivable, everyone requires a moment (um) to comprehend more of it...
Truth in the world and the attempts of {some} to manipulate that status
a) "attempt" implies a temporary (partial) and manipulating temporary implies within the momentum of ongoing (whole).
b) "manipulation" implies manual (living) within automatic (process of dying) aka reaction within enacting.
c) suggested STATUS - "legal standing of a person" tempts one to ignore the perceivable flow-state representing ones laid constitution aka LAW, noun [Latin lex; from the root of lay; law is that which is laid, set or fixed, like statute, constitution.]
Perceivable represents the laid law, suggested represents the fixed law..."maritime admiralty law" utilizes the laid law (maritime) underneath the fixed law (admiralty) and the trick used represents AD'MIRAL, noun (Heb. to speak) aka the affixed word over the flow of sound.
"all truth is relative” == “no truth is absolute”
a) RELA'TE, verb [Latin relatus, refero; re and fero, to produce.]...perceivable nature represents the only producer, which implies that every suggested (artificial) truth within is a product of nature, hence relative.
One is tempted to ignore nature as the relative producer of everything, when consenting to suggested "relativism", which the one suggesting it the perceived producer thereof, hence artificial suggestion masquerading as perceivable nature.
b) AB'SOLUTE, adjective - "complete in itself" implies the whole, not the suggested truth by any of the partial ones within. Suggesting others that something is absolute, tempts one to ignore being the partial among partials within the absolute whole.
“all that is unholy is holy”
a) all that is....is....no matter what each one within suggests other ones it to be.
b) HO'LY, adjective - "whole" + UN - "deprivation of"...it's the partial (growth) within the whole (loss) which can perceive loss (deprivation of growth), yet comprehension about growth coexisting within loss needs to be grown first, hence self discernment required for reassembly of comprehension.
Added a little more in an edit...
Everything is already perceivable, everyone requires a moment (um) to comprehend more of it...
Truth in the world and the attempts of {some} to manipulate that status
a) "attempt" implies a temporary (partial) and manipulating temporary implies within the momentum of ongoing (whole).
b) "manipulation" implies manual (living) within automatic (process of dying) aka reaction within enacting.
c) suggested STATUS - "legal standing of a person" tempts one to ignore the perceivable flow-state representing ones laid constitution aka LAW, noun [Latin lex; from the root of lay; law is that which is laid, set or fixed, like statute, constitution.]
Perceivable represents the laid law, suggested represents the fixed law..."maritime admiralty law" utilizes the laid law (maritime) underneath the fixed law (admiralty) and the trick used represents AD'MIRAL, noun (Heb. to speak) aka the affixed word over the flow of sound.
"all truth is relative” == “no truth is absolute”
a) RELA'TE, verb [Latin relatus, refero; re and fero, to produce.]...perceivable nature represents the only producer, which implies that every suggested (artificial) truth within is a product of nature, hence relative.
One is tempted to ignore nature as the relative producer of everything, when consenting to suggested "relativism", which the one suggesting it the perceived producer thereof, hence artificial suggestion masquerading as perceivable nature.
b) AB'SOLUTE, adjective - "complete in itself" implies the whole, not the suggested truth by any of the partial ones within. Suggesting others that something is absolute, tempts one to ignore being the partial among partials within the absolute whole.
“all that is unholy is holy”
a) all that is....is....no matter what each one within suggests other ones it to be.
b) HO'LY, adjective - "whole" + UN - "deprivation of"...it's the partial (growth) within the whole (loss) which can perceive loss (deprivation of growth), yet comprehension about growth coexisting within loss needs to be grown first, hence self discernment required for reassembly of comprehension.
freedom is slavery
a) everything is...everyone within can only adapt to everything that was, because ones choice of adaptation...takes a moment (um).
b) being "free" will of choice within the "dom" inance of balance implies the choice to be a SLAVE, noun - "subject to the will of another" by ones consent to the suggestions of another one.
Consenting to suggested sets the suggesting as the master, while subjecting oneself as the slave. Free-dom demands response-ability (choice).
Postmodernism/relativism...Sabbatean Frankists...Orwellian doublespeakers...claim
A CLAIM, verb - "to call for; to ask or seek to obtain" represents a temptation for everyone else to consent to, by wanting a piece of the suggested, hence obtaining a "truth" to uphold mentally. It's ones consent to a suggested claim, that gives the one suggesting the power to gain control over the claimed consent.
How does the metaphysical fit into your conception?
a) PHYS'IC, noun [Gr. from nature; to produce.] + META (Gr. after)...hence meta (living) within physic (process of dying).
b) each partial fits into whole.
c) CONCEIVE, verb [Latin , to take.]...everything is received; everyone within is tempted to want to hold onto it, while ignoring the need to resist.
Does anything resembling Platonic Forms exist?
a) PLAT- "to spread"....form (partial) implies the internal/inherent spread of flow (whole).
b) Theory of forms: "non-physical (but substantial) Forms (or ideas) represent the most accurate reality"...
-
take the suggested "non" out and the perceivable "physic" (nature) implies the nature of everything (flow state).
-
whole flow represents essential; each partial form represents inessential (within essence)
-
suggested SUB'STANCE, noun - "essential nature or essential part" mixes whole (essential) and partial (inessential) together, hence making it harder for the partial to discern self within whole.
-
accuracy (wanted truth) vs inaccuracy (not wanted lie) ignores the need to adapt to perceivable ACU'TE, adjective - "sharp at the end (death); penetrating (impressing process of dying towards expression of living)"
Or does the Flow comprise the totality of All?
a) only within the momentum of flow can there be form...both together (ones within oneness; partials within whole) represents TO'TAL, adjective [Latin totalis, totus.] - "whole".
b) COMPRISE, verb - "to comprehend"...that represents a choice of the partial (form) within the whole (flow), hence the compression (comprehension) of the impressing (perceivable) for expression (growth)....or repression (loss).
In short...comprise (growth) represents the reaction within enacting dismissal (loss) and dismissal represents the departure of each partial as conscious existence within the whole, hence the voyage (process of dying) or each vessel (living).
SAY, verb - "to utter in words"...nature represents the perceivable sound that allows the ignorant within to utter suggestible words.
Usurper - one who chooses want (suggested) over need (perceivable), hence one trying to hold onto ongoing.
Truth - suggested information; one consents to hold onto, within a moving system of perceivable inspiration.
Infinite - perceivable whole through the lens of the perceiving partial.
Why have the .win's been divided against each other?
Each suggestion tempts consent (want or not want) into division (want versus not want)...
Why do they mock
Ignorance tempts insolence.
rational compared to speculation.
SPECULA'TION, noun - "examination by the eye" implies adaptation to perceivable; RA'TIONAL, adjective - "having reason" implies reasoning over suggested.
"marxism" is just used to describe things that have nothing to do with what really Marx meant
a) the meaning of every suggested -ism is being defined, redefined and contradicted by those suggesting it and for those consenting to it.
b) suggested meaning (modifiable) is utilized to tempt one to ignore perceivable predefined meaning (inherent).
c) the suggested idol "Marx" represents both the sales-pitch for the Marxism, as well as the cover for the choice (suggestion) towards choice (consent) contract law underneath. Without the cover...those consenting may suspect the authority of those suggesting.
have nothing to do with
What if all that was is inherent within all that is? What if the many ignore the ongoing, which allows the few to use the temporary (falling away through progression) as narratives to distract from ones need to sustain self (living) within ongoing (process of dying)?
controlled elitist capitalism for chosen ones
a) ELITE, noun (French élite) - "selection, choice" represents the many consenting to the suggested choices of the few, hence selecting and thereby shaping them into the "chosen ones".
b) consenting to the suggested -ism gives control to those suggesting and ones ignorance of perceivable represents the CAPITAL (pertaining to the head) PUNISH (pain) MENT (mind/memory).
c) everything the many consented to is being stored within their memory, which allows the suggesting few to control their minds and utilize them as capital. All conflicts of reason represents head vs head among the many, while reasoning about the suggested information the few are shaping within the heads of the many. For example...it doesn't matter if the many reason over capitalism vs communism, since only the few can define both -isms.
advanced indirect
Being (life) within direction (inception towards death) implies advancement.
slavery
Choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law represents slavery; while balance (perceivable) to choice (perceiving) natural law implies "free" will of choice within the "dom" inance of balance aka free-dom.
In short...representing free will of choice within perceivable represents free-dom, consenting to suggested represents slavery to those suggesting it...by contractual agreement.
society is divided
The few suggest "society" ( consensual togetherness) to tempt each one of the many to ignore perceivable apartheid (living) within wholeness (process of dying), hence suggested togetherness as the inversion of perceivable division.
means of production and driven by basic needs
The process of dying represents the only producer (generator), those living within represent the needed adaptation (reactor) while being generated (regeneration).
Loss (process of dying) generates growth (living)..growth needs to struggle to sustain self within loss, yet wields the choice of wanting to ignore need.
just like other labels...anything some group don't like.
Ones consent to want or not want any suggested label (-ism)...shapes the want versus not want group (reason). If you ignore need (perceivable) for want (suggested), you'll attach yourself to the conflict of reason among all those who want vs not want the suggested.
In other words...if the singular choice consents to another singular choice, then there will be a plural conflict.
how to maintain a single-minded and a single-united course
a) by comprehending perceivable DAI (divider) MON (provider) aka whole divider (process of dying) for partial provided (living).
b) consenting to suggested "we" (plural) tempts "one" (singular) to ignore self, hence ignoring single-mindedness for plural-consensus.
c) consenting to suggested outcomes (progressivism) tempts one to ignore the single-united course for each life...from inception towards death.
constant and unchanging
Nigga pls...change (motion) represents the permanent state...only within constant motion can one choose to reanimate "stop-motion" MOVIES.
mastercard is the top of
a) it's called CREDIT, noun [Latin creed.] - "belief; faith", because giving it to the suggestions of others represents submission (slave) to their will (master). The cards are used as means of identification, hence IDEN'TITY, noun - "sameness" of submissive slaves, instead of diversity (difference) of free will of choice.
b) top implies bottom (coexisting opposites in balance with each other), and perceivable balance (top/bottom) implies free will of choice at the center thereof. Others suggest one to reach the top or to be at the bottom, as to distract one from discerning ones position at the center of everything perceivable.
illuminati
Perception represents the source of light; comprehension represents illumination; ignorance represents darkness.
now i know
Knowledge represents perceivable inspiration, communicates through ongoing motion (inception towards death). Motion generates momentum (balance), which represents the perceivable, ever changing moment (um), for each perceiving ones choice to respond to...this moment represents "now". Others suggest "past; present and future" to distract one (choice) from adapting to the moment (balance) of now.
Sleight of hand: "Take me to the magic of the moment...In the wind of change" ... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n4RjJKxsamQ
Everyone (perceiving) knows everything (perceivable)...others tempt one with suggestion (fiction) to willingly ignore perceivable (reality).
because of your
Nature (process of dying) represents the only cause, everyone within (living) represents the effect thereof. To be (effect) implies within; out of and in response to (cause).
secret forbidden knowledge
a) nature offers everything (perceivable) to everyone (perceiving) at any moment (um).
b) any concealment (hidden from mind) is based on ones consent to ignore perceivable (need) for suggested (want).
c) choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law (inversion of balance to choice natural law) gives those suggesting the power to define (idolatry); redefine (revisionism) and contradict (talmudic reasoning) the suggested meaning at will, which the few utilize for example to withhold it from the many, hence "forbidding" them access to the now "hidden" information, the many believe to represent "knowledge".
Resist the temptation to hold onto suggested information within your mind/memory and you can tap perceivable inspiration by adapting to whatever inspires. This way perception delivers whatever the consciousness needs at the moment of adaptation.
by chance
CHANCE, noun - "effect of an unknown cause"...the few suggest "chance" to tempt each one of the many to keep ignoring the only perceivable cause (process of dying) for every perceiving effect (living).
points out the exact secret truth of everything
a) "points out" implies your want of suggested outcomes by others, while ignoring the need to adapt to perceivable origin.
b) truth implies versus lies aka your choice to want (truth) vs not want (lies) the suggested information by others, while again ignoring the need to adapt to perceivable.
c) "secret" implies your "creed" aka your consent to the suggested information by others, while ignoring your response-ability (choice) to adapt to perceivable inspiration.
d) ask yourself if everything (perceivable whole) is inherent within everyone (perceiving partial), hence everyone (living) representing an expression (growth) of the impressing (loss) everything (process of dying)?
In short...temporary growth (living) within ongoing loss (process of dying).
RNG
a) RAN'DOM, noun - "motion without direction"...represents the suggested inversion of perceivable motion (inception towards death) aka from/to aka forwards velocity. To be within motion implies reactor (living) within generator (process of dying).
The few suggest "actors" under "directors" to tempt the many to ignore the implied "reaction"...instead the many react in ignorance, hence "monkey see, monkey do" adaptation to suggested information.
b) NUM'BER, noun - "the designation of a unit" + U'NIT, noun [Latin unus, unitas, unity.] - "one"...being partial (living) within whole (process of dying) implies being "one" within "oneness"...others suggest one to count numbers (ones), while ignoring "oneself".
Suggested "two" doesn't exist within perceivable nature. Put any "two" things next to each other, and notice that each "one" of them has to exist at a different position for you to be able to perceive it, hence to discern differences in motion (inspiration).
Sleight of hand: "all for one and one for all" + "there can be only one" + "alone" aka ALL(in)ONE.
c) there can be only one generator (process of dying) for each one reactor (living) aka sameness (whole) generating different (partial) reactions.
accidental enlightenment
What if willing ignorance (darkness) tempts one to repress growth of comprehension (enlightenment), hence brushing a fully functioning system (impression towards expression aka loss towards growth) off as accidental happenings?
discover
I see what you did there...
Also... if comedy (living) can only exist within drama (process of dying), then expressing the perceivable comedic within the suggested dramatic can unravel the conspiracy of the few; suggesting narratives using both comedy and drama, to distract the many.
DIS- (lack of) COURSE (motion forward)...really? Or would questioning this contradiction of reality DETER (to frighten) MENT (mind)?
Does suggesting accusations (you wasted) in the name of others (everyone's time), as well as mocking (congratulations) and branding (you are a terrible person) others fit into the topic of abuse?
What if social media suggests one the administrative tools to abuse others, hence tempting everyone to abuse each other?
No part of that equals 33°
a) DEGREE, noun - "a space in progression"...represents the momentum (balance) of motion (process of dying) for the form choice (living) within.
b) partial (living) implies different from one another; whole (process of dying) implies equal.
height as denoted by Freemason rank
What if one is tempted by other ones to count, while struggling to climb ranks, just to find oneself in the process...or fail to do so?
NUM'BER, noun - "the designation of a unit"...from U'NIT, noun [Latin unus, unitas, unity.] - "one". What if a suggested fraternity represents the brotherhood to conceal each "one" within?
rotation speed
Is it about speed if the axis represents ongoing velocity (inception towards death) or about the temporary resistance of the one (life) life?
Sleight of hand: what was the movie "SPEED" about? Keeping within momentum or boom.
It's...at best
Best (want) vs worse (not want) represents "ones" choice to ignore need...
a) anyone shaping suggestions by free will of choice represents a mason, hence shaping walls of ignorance within the minds/memories of those, who were tempted to consent.
b) choice can only exist at the center of balance, so balance (momentum of motion) represents the only "room" for ones choice to exist within.
Notice that choosing in-between left/right; up/down and front/back places ones perspective at the center of a room...a cube.
People aren't going to
Why suggest in the name of others, rather than express as oneself?
People aren't going to read any of that.
Did you choose to read any of that?
You are a hindrance
HIN'DERANCE, noun - "the act of impeding or restraining motion"...living implies being a temporary reaction within ongoing motion. Ignoring this for wanting to restrict the movement of others represents spending ones resistance against others instead of for the sustenance of self (life) within the ongoing motion (inception towards death).
to be ignored
Choosing ignorance implies want (suggested) over need (perceivable), hence ignorance of need for want.
knockoff goods
I get that if one knocks-off the price and quality of suggested goods, then advertising them as knocked-down bads could be an issue, by why would those pointing out "knock-offs" associate their goods with whatever bad others knocked them down to?
Could suggested "good" represent a brand more valuable, than whatever "bad" others could do to it?
they knocked off...
The process of dying does that to everything the living want to hold onto...others mimic this with suggested narratives to distract one from resisting the want to hold onto for the need to resist.
lumber
LUM'BER, noun - "any thing useless and cumbersome, or things bulky and thrown aside as of no use; harm; mischief; heaped together in disorder"... https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/lumber
About that revisionism...
absence makes the heart grow fonder
The rhythm the heart beats in response to is always there...absence represents the choice of the partial to ignore wholeness. Abstinence from suggested distractions, allows the heartbeat to re-calibrate with the natural order.
Get that high ground
Everyone already got it...being HIGH (temporary evaluation) within GROUND (ongoing value), hence the highest value representing evaluation.
all the way to the horizon
The way (inception towards death) generates the HOR'IZON, noun [Gr. to bound, a limit.] aka it's momentum (balance) for the formed choices at the center. Without discerning ones position at the center, the out of reach horizon will keep tempting one off-balance.
Notice that other ones can exist at the limit of ones horizon, yet wanting to catch up with others, keeps ones horizon as unreachable as ever...
It's lookin' rather rusty these days, ain't it?
Nah..a string of yarn would keep those who willingly ignore response-ability (choice) chained to the suggestions of others. Consent represents the chain and ignorance keeps it in shape. Those who resist the temptation to consent to suggested, can try to rattle the chain of others, but ignorance will prevent recognition thereof.
I think I've got a Rope of Command
Showing off adaptation skills at chain of command inspection day will get ya noticed...
added nothing of value
a) everything (process of dying) gives (inception) and takes (dying) to and from everyone (living)...others suggest one to ADD, verb - "to set or put together, join or unite", hence e pluribus unum (out of many, one); tikkun olam (healing the world by bringing together); united states; united nations; european union; uniformity; equality (sameness) through diversity (difference) etc.
b) perceivable (inspiration) represents value, suggested (information) represents ones ignorance to evaluate (perceiving) value, while tempting others to choose the same.
c) the few suggest creationism (out of nothing) to tempt the many to believe someone can add something to everything already in existence. Meanwhile; nature setting itself apart; from whole (process of dying) into each partial (living) implies perceivable transmutation (out of everything).
conversation
What if one is tempted to want to converse (interchange of thoughts or opinions), which tempts one to ignore the need to adapt to perceivable origin (inspiration), while being INTER (internal aka within) CHANGED (being moved by)?
How about this...why are those tempted to abuse others also tempted to leave marks upon others? Furthermore; why are those in the position to abuse others, tempting others to mark themselves, hence choosing self-abuse?
a) free will of choice can only exist within the boundaries (limit) of balance. Without balance (need/want)...no choice in-between.
b) LIM'IT, noun - "the part that terminates a thing"...a suggested inversion of the perceivable whole (process of dying) terminating each perceiving partial (living).
c) how would you expand awareness of body-art? Why stain the natural, while tempting self to hold onto the artificial? Why disguise appearances? Why worship the suggested symbolism instead of the perceivable symmetry...a symmetry in motion?
d) color implies "inherent within light", which also implies coexistence with darkness, so why put value on the colors, instead of evaluating the ongoing spectrum of colors, as the center spectator with the free will of choice to paint in-between light and darkness?
e) what is it about being ANOINT'ED - "rubbed with oil; set apart; consecrated with oil" that draws the many to the suggestions of others?
f) COSMETIC, adjective. [Greek; order, beauty.] implies the natural order...not artificial orders suggested by others.
Did something Chase Goldman & Sachs onto the American Express to seek Visa elsewhere? Just kidding...the Master holds the Cards, only the slaves scramble.
I'm aware of staining (dyeing)... STAIN, verb - "to blot; to soil; to spot with guilt or infamy; to tarnish; to bring reproach on" and of those who suggest "art" (artificial) to tempt others to ignore natural.
As the temporary (living) one needs to resist the ongoing (process of dying), not mimic it by trying to stain the temporary (body) with suggested permanence (tattoo).
The few suggest temporary body-art to tempt the many to want to hold onto it, hence a gateway-drug to permanent body-art. To re-balance this...embrace the moment when painter expresses upon living canvas, then wash it off to pay response-ability to ongoing origin...the naturally perceivable underneath the artificially suggested.
"henna" means
a) TATTOO; noun (Dutch taptoe) - "signal calling soldiers or sailors to quarters at night; figuratively say no more"
b) all words suggest meaning to those consenting to ignore predefined meaning (perceivable sound). Consenting to suggested words gives those suggesting the power to define; redefine and contradict the suggested meaning at will.
is disgusting; are unable; is pathetic...
If one suggests what "is", then that implies that something "was" perceivable, before one can shape suggestions about what it "is". How could one define by suggestion what is, when everything was perceivable before being able to shape suggestions?
unable
How can those within reality be "unable" while being enabled by reality? What defines sufficiency (being able)...suggested or perceivable?
"WEF"...unelected.
a) ELECT', verb [Latin electus, from eligo; Greek; to choose.]..."unelected" doesn't exist within reality, since everything perceivable represents choice based reactions. One cannot "not" choose. To be (living) implies choice based adaptation to being within (process of dying).
b) consenting to suggested "WEF" and perpetuating "WEF is" by tweeting towards the consenting (agreement or disagreement) choices of others, implies suggested "WEF" to be elected by ones consenting free will of choice.
never asked for
The living never asked for the process of dying...others suggest questions to tempt one to want suggested answers from them. Meanwhile; one is tempted to ignore being a temporary problem (living) within ongoing solution (process of dying), hence struggling to sustain self.
a) nature sets itself apart, from whole (process of dying) into each partial (living), hence differentiation (temporary growth) within sameness (ongoing loss)...external action to distinguish internal reaction.
b) PECU'LIAR, adjective (Latin peculiaris, from peculium, one's own property, from pecus, cattle)...within perceivable motion one cannot own anything (hence being moved by everything); others exploit ones ignorance thereof by suggesting that one can if holding onto suggested (information) within perceivable (inspiration). In return...ones consent to the suggestion of another shapes the many into the order following cattle of the few.
c) M'ARK, noun [Latin mercor, the primary sense of which is to go, to pass; Greek; to pass)...hence life being passed from inception towards death..."marked for death"
a) partial (difference) cannot perceive whole (sameness), hence being differentiated through and within the momentum of whole. Notice that while alive, one cannot perceive ones own inception and death, hence temporary living within the momentum of ongoing motion (inception towards death).
Look at anything you believe to be the "same", and allow yourself to notice that each has to exist at a "different" position for your to be able to perceive each thing. Everything implies sameness; each thing within represents difference.
Others suggest likeness (differences mimicking sameness) under the umbrella of sameness aka e pluribus unum (out of many; one) or tikkun olam (healing the world by bringing together) or equality (sameness) through diversity (difference) or united nations; united states; european union, uniformity or one world; one people etc.
b) to be (living) implies within (process of dying), hence struggling to sustain apartheid within wholeness.
Sleight of hand:
"come on and let me know (perceivable inspiration)...should I stay (resist) or should I go (ignore) now (momentum)"
"If I go, there will be trouble (death)...And if I stay it will be double (perpetuating of life through offspring)"
The band is called "The Clash" as in velocity (process of dying) meeting resistance (living) within momentum.
ADVANCE (flow) MENT (formed mind responding to flowing input).
TIME, noun (Latin tempus; tempora) - "duration"...aka temporary duration of those within the momentum of ongoing motion, hence one perceiving the ever changing moment (um) of now.
One can only exit "now" not "before" or "after"....others suggest before (past) and after (future) to corrupt ones comprehension of now (present).
a) whatever you suggest "is"..."was" perceivable before you could shape a suggesting about it.
b) ME'ANING, participle - "having in mind"...the mind (Greek memory) represents a response to input; both perceivable inspiration and suggested information, the former represents predefined meaning, while the latter tempts with redefined meaning.
c) to write down "unchanged" implies changing perceivable symmetry into suggestible symbolism, writing upon something changes it; suggesting written towards consent by reading implies a consensual exchange; while writing or reading you'll breathe, hence adapt to constant change (expression of impressing)...
d) UN - "negation; cessation of motion"...partial (living) cannot negate whole (process of dying) or react to it. Prolonging (growth) or shortening (loss) life doesn't negate being moved from inception towards death...it represents ones ongoing struggle to growth within loss by temporary resisting (living) ongoing temptation (dying).
a) we (plural) is being suggested to tempt one (singular) to ignore self.
b) don't (doing nothing) is being suggested as the inversion of being (living) done by everything (process of dying).
c) the choice of left/right; up/down and forwards/backwards can only be made within balance (momentum of motion) and choice can only exist at the center of balance, hence as "free" will of choice within the "dom" inance of balance aka free-dom aka temporary free (living) within ongoing dominance (process of dying).
d) going backwards won't let you climb back into your moms womb again, neither does it stop aging (dying).
e) HAVE, verb - "to hold in possession or power"...one represents the power of resistance (living) within the power of velocity (process of dying). Holding onto (want) tempts one to ignore resisting (need) being dissolved, while being processed.