The Boy with the Henna Tattoo
(youtu.be)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (17)
sorted by:
a) free will of choice can only exist within the boundaries (limit) of balance. Without balance (need/want)...no choice in-between.
b) LIM'IT, noun - "the part that terminates a thing"...a suggested inversion of the perceivable whole (process of dying) terminating each perceiving partial (living).
c) how would you expand awareness of body-art? Why stain the natural, while tempting self to hold onto the artificial? Why disguise appearances? Why worship the suggested symbolism instead of the perceivable symmetry...a symmetry in motion?
d) color implies "inherent within light", which also implies coexistence with darkness, so why put value on the colors, instead of evaluating the ongoing spectrum of colors, as the center spectator with the free will of choice to paint in-between light and darkness?
e) what is it about being ANOINT'ED - "rubbed with oil; set apart; consecrated with oil" that draws the many to the suggestions of others?
f) COSMETIC, adjective. [Greek; order, beauty.] implies the natural order...not artificial orders suggested by others.
You added nothing of value to this conversation.
a) everything (process of dying) gives (inception) and takes (dying) to and from everyone (living)...others suggest one to ADD, verb - "to set or put together, join or unite", hence e pluribus unum (out of many, one); tikkun olam (healing the world by bringing together); united states; united nations; european union; uniformity; equality (sameness) through diversity (difference) etc.
b) perceivable (inspiration) represents value, suggested (information) represents ones ignorance to evaluate (perceiving) value, while tempting others to choose the same.
c) the few suggest creationism (out of nothing) to tempt the many to believe someone can add something to everything already in existence. Meanwhile; nature setting itself apart; from whole (process of dying) into each partial (living) implies perceivable transmutation (out of everything).
What if one is tempted to want to converse (interchange of thoughts or opinions), which tempts one to ignore the need to adapt to perceivable origin (inspiration), while being INTER (internal aka within) CHANGED (being moved by)?
How about this...why are those tempted to abuse others also tempted to leave marks upon others? Furthermore; why are those in the position to abuse others, tempting others to mark themselves, hence choosing self-abuse?
People aren't going to read any of that. Just the replies to your spam, such as this one. You are a hindrance to be ignored.
Why suggest in the name of others, rather than express as oneself?
Did you choose to read any of that?
HIN'DERANCE, noun - "the act of impeding or restraining motion"...living implies being a temporary reaction within ongoing motion. Ignoring this for wanting to restrict the movement of others represents spending ones resistance against others instead of for the sustenance of self (life) within the ongoing motion (inception towards death).
Choosing ignorance implies want (suggested) over need (perceivable), hence ignorance of need for want.