I get that if one knocks-off the price and quality of suggested goods, then advertising them as knocked-down bads could be an issue, by why would those pointing out "knock-offs" associate their goods with whatever bad others knocked them down to?
Could suggested "good" represent a brand more valuable, than whatever "bad" others could do to it?
they knocked off...
The process of dying does that to everything the living want to hold onto...others mimic this with suggested narratives to distract one from resisting the want to hold onto for the need to resist.
The rhythm the heart beats in response to is always there...absence represents the choice of the partial to ignore wholeness. Abstinence from suggested distractions, allows the heartbeat to re-calibrate with the natural order.
Get that high ground
Everyone already got it...being HIGH (temporary evaluation) within GROUND (ongoing value), hence the highest value representing evaluation.
all the way to the horizon
The way (inception towards death) generates the HOR'IZON, noun [Gr. to bound, a limit.] aka it's momentum (balance) for the formed choices at the center. Without discerning ones position at the center, the out of reach horizon will keep tempting one off-balance.
Notice that other ones can exist at the limit of ones horizon, yet wanting to catch up with others, keeps ones horizon as unreachable as ever...
It's lookin' rather rusty these days, ain't it?
Nah..a string of yarn would keep those who willingly ignore response-ability (choice) chained to the suggestions of others. Consent represents the chain and ignorance keeps it in shape. Those who resist the temptation to consent to suggested, can try to rattle the chain of others, but ignorance will prevent recognition thereof.
I think I've got a Rope of Command
Showing off adaptation skills at chain of command inspection day will get ya noticed...
I get that if one knocks-off the price and quality of suggested goods, then advertising them as knocked-down bads could be an issue, by why would those pointing out "knock-offs" associate their goods with whatever bad others knocked them down to?
Could suggested "good" represent a brand more valuable, than whatever "bad" others could do to it?
The process of dying does that to everything the living want to hold onto...others mimic this with suggested narratives to distract one from resisting the want to hold onto for the need to resist.
LUM'BER, noun - "any thing useless and cumbersome, or things bulky and thrown aside as of no use; harm; mischief; heaped together in disorder"... https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/lumber
About that revisionism...
The rhythm the heart beats in response to is always there...absence represents the choice of the partial to ignore wholeness. Abstinence from suggested distractions, allows the heartbeat to re-calibrate with the natural order.
Everyone already got it...being HIGH (temporary evaluation) within GROUND (ongoing value), hence the highest value representing evaluation.
The way (inception towards death) generates the HOR'IZON, noun [Gr. to bound, a limit.] aka it's momentum (balance) for the formed choices at the center. Without discerning ones position at the center, the out of reach horizon will keep tempting one off-balance.
Notice that other ones can exist at the limit of ones horizon, yet wanting to catch up with others, keeps ones horizon as unreachable as ever...
Nah..a string of yarn would keep those who willingly ignore response-ability (choice) chained to the suggestions of others. Consent represents the chain and ignorance keeps it in shape. Those who resist the temptation to consent to suggested, can try to rattle the chain of others, but ignorance will prevent recognition thereof.
Showing off adaptation skills at chain of command inspection day will get ya noticed...