Money is just an agreed upon metric that doesn't mean anything in reality
Both money and meaning represent measurements taken by ones consent to the suggestion of another. Nature gives mind; mind takes measurement while ignoring given.
earthly riches all perish
The perishing process represents moving value aka rich/reg - "to move in a straight line"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/rich
Early riches represent the possessions formed within the flowing process...which cannot be held onto without destroying growth potential.
all perish like
All implies same; each one within implies diverse from one another...likeness represents an earthly richness suggested by few to tempt many into taking possession by holding onto one another.
If diverse within same behaves alike, then it perishes faster.
ash and dust...
...imply remains of fire aka flowing heat forming cold ash and dust.
beholders are beholden
Ones consent to any suggestion by another implies a being holding onto aka taking into possession, while the possession of another.
Ones choice beholding becomes beholden to a chosen ones suggestion. Becoming beholden by something another suggests represents the animation of an anthropomorphic being aka a remotely controllable golem/golum/goyim.
Billionaires dont work
All works, which employs each one within....few suggests zeros added to one to tempt many into ignoring that.
If you made...
Work made you...few tempt many to ignore that by suggesting that more can be made than all already offered.
you still wouldn't be
Work moves and can't stand still...anyone employed within work can choose to ignore being moved. Few exploit this ignorance among many by adding zeros to one to mimic stillness aka the movement of nothing.
until
Until implies onward towards outcome...work implies origin for anyone employed within. Few tempt many to work "until" making enough to remain still...which represents an outcome which cannot be reached within motion.
They always feared we would stop paying taxes, banker debts
Fear implies towards outcome...few suggest taxes and debts as burdens for many to carry within an artificial currency, while ignoring the unstoppable natural current moving towards outcome anything coming into being within.
join the club...save your money
Joining increases burden; currency/current cannot be saved.
reduce the value to nothing
Everything (flow) reduces each thing (form)...unless resisted. Adding value to anything implies ones de-nial/nihilo (nothing) of everything.
Flowing value (perceivable) forms evaluation (perception)...denial devalues evaluation.
What illuminism is
All was light (lumi) before each one comes into being within (il) as a native (nati)...shaped -isms tempt one to consent to what another suggests IS - "third person singular present indicative of be".
All (first) > one (second/seco; to divide) > another (third person)...one cannot consent to another without ignoring all giving each one being.
Looking at the average
Average/avarie - "damage to ship" aka damage to goods (life) in transit (inception towards death). To be implies extraordinary...hence few suggesting averages to tempt many into undermining one another.
A jew suggests arithmetic averages to distract gentiles from ones intermediate free will of choice within nature's balance.
ethnic
In Septuagint, Greek ta ethne translates Hebrew goyim, plural of goy "nation," especially of non-Israelites, hence especially "gentile nation, foreign nation not worshipping the true God" (see goy), and ethnikos is used by ecclesiastical writers in a sense of "savoring of the nature of pagans, alien to the worship of the true God," and as a noun "the pagan, the gentile."... https://www.etymonline.com/word/ethnic
white
White implies pure light aka fully luminous and devoid of hue (aka human). Light generates a spectrum within which each ray (race) comes into being, which allows each being to purify within light or to pollute into darkness.
A jew suggests white (pure light) and black (absence of light) to tempt gentiles who choose either side into a conflict against one another. Why? To mix the visible spectrum of light, which distorts the sight of each being within.
smart
Smart/smert - "pain"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/smart aka punishment aka the agony suffered by Christ. A jew tempts gentiles to view each other as "smart"; thereby establishing a consensus about punishment.
everybody
Body implies each (partial); not every (whole) aka apart from one another...not together.
empire
Aka em (within) pire (to produce) aka each single being produced within nature....not the plural "empires" build by few beings to tempt many beings into wiling subjection to imperial power.
circumstantial
Nature implies delineation (inception towards death) of being (life)...a jew suggests circular thinking (logic) to tempt gentiles into circular conflict (reason), which in re-TURN permits each jew centralized con-TROL over gentile CIRCUM-ference. And what does each jew do at center of circumference? Erecting self while circumcising the circumference.
supreme
Being implies as above/so below aka in-between aka rising (life) during fall (inception towards death) aka inferior within superior.
A jew tempts gentiles to fight one another aka inferior vs inferior, which in return permits each jew the superior position above gentiles by simply suggesting the ring for gentiles to fight each other in.
nonsense
One cannot sense nothing. A jew suggest nihil-ism (nihilo; nothing) to tempt gentiles to de-nial everything perceivable for suggested nothing.
Example 1: Seinfeld's Nothing Pitch... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EQnaRtNMGMI
Example 2: The Believer. "Cause it's the deepest impulse of a jewish soul to pull at the very fabric of life until there's nothing left but a thread. They want nothing but nothingness; nothingness without end."... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZRUjy1Dhx-k
Two-dimensional given Three-dimensional form...all that’s needed is Soul
Soul/sole - "one and only" aka one flow giving form to each one within by division.
Dimensional aka di (to divide) mens (mind) ion (action) al (all) aka all action dividing each ones mind from one another. It's not TWO dimensional, but oneness dividing internally into opposites. It's not THREE dimensional, but each one (life) coming into being in-between opposites (inception/death) of oneness.
Only matter (three) within momentum (two) of motion (one) has the free will of choice to count together what nature sets apart from one another. Others trick one to count, which makes one accountable to others, while distracting from discerning self as within singularity by joining plurality with one another.
data given form
Data/dare/do - "to give"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/data
Data implies all perceivable given to each ones perception. Any exchangeable data aka suggestible information tempts one to TAKE while ignore given.
Gattaca
The last time I watched that was on VHS. Anyway...the DNA origin of the name is based on shaping a double-helix aka one matter + one matter turned against one another aka the serpent's coil aka ourobouros aka the ring that binds aka kike/kikel/circle aka internal (logic) and external (reason) confinement.
Soul, or the breathe of life
Soul (motion) > breathe (momentum) > life (matter)...not OR, since only matter alternates aka adaptation (matter) to change (motion) as choice within balance (momentum).
Two particles created in the same event are “entangled”, facilitating Spukhafte Fernwirkung or “spooky action at a distance”
Two implies counted together by one being. Another one suggests creationism to establish entanglement within ones mind. Ones consent to another ones suggested -ism establishes the "two" aka one and one together.
As for Spukhafte Fernwirkung aka the anthropomorphic animation of a being by another from outside...that's the jewish Golem... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golem
Here's the related quote: "Over the centuries, it (Golem) has been used to connote war, community, isolation, hope, and despair." Spooky; ain't it?
As for Spuk aka Mr. Spock; spies called spooks; blacks called spooks etc. That's about "specter, apparition, ghost" aka utilizing the process of dying by distracting those living within from being animated aka being a living dead.
Life inhales the animating spirit, while exhaling the ghost of death...to distract from that...perceivable sound gets inverted into suggestible words, so that a being doesn't draw from animation, but instead animates corpus-oration aka the language of death.
Words do not animate...they draw animation out of life.
All particles in the universe ultimately derive from a single event (a so-called “big bang”)
a) Particle implies each one within all..."all particles" implies a sum of particles put together.
b) Only particles can "bang" against one another, which puts form at odds with one another, while ignoring the single even flow aka the event horizon (inception towards death) for each zenith (life) rising within.
c) Derive aka de (to divide) rive/rei (to flow) aka flow deriving into form.
I think we can recognize God therein
I implies taking possession over oneself; WE implies singular one joining plurality with one another...both contradict re (to respond) cognize (to perceive).
God (all perceivable) therein (each ones perception) implies an analytical process...not a synthesis of putting possession (i) together (we).
Once one chooses to resist synthesis (suggestion)...analysis (perception) allows one to recognize self as therein God, which makes it clearer how others are synthesizing to obscure ones self discernment.
We aren’t observing the hologram, we are a part of it
Holo (whole) gram (to draw or write)...only within all can each one draw from reality or write fiction. Holding onto fiction establishes the optical interference pattern within oneself.
One drawing (gram) from all (holo) implies being part of it...one writing/reading from one another implies observance.
neuroscience
One can only perceive (science/scio/to know) NOW...others suggest NEW (neuro) to manipulate ones perception.
our perception of the “hologram” known as “reality”
Holding onto "our" represents the fictitious hologram. Real implies each ones response (re) to all (al) aka a singular delineation of cause > effect.
intersection of... consciousness
Inter (within) sec (to separate) tion (action) implies an analytical process. Con (together) scious (to perceive) ness (denoting action) implies a shaped synthesis.
Intersection implies reality; consciousness represents fiction. Other words for consciousness...hivemind; gestalt intelligence; egregore; collective consciousness; mind coalescence; swarm intelligence; universal mind; group think etc.
Occultists that practice evil and good mixed.
Few suggest both sides to tempt many to mix in conflict against each other. Choosing either SIDE occults SIGHT. One can only see from in-between...inclining to either side distorts ones sight.
only practices evil
There can be only one...hence evil/live implying an inversion.
They claim...
Few shape suggestions to tempt many into a consensus...each member within claiming a side.
Nature cannot be claimed since it moves. Any claim by a being (perception) implies denial of natural (perceivable) for consent to artificial (suggested).
God is...
God WAS before anyone within can suggest to each other what IS.
the fact that good and evil
Fact aka "fictitious act" establishes a good vs evil conflict...if one chooses to hold onto any fact.
Trinity concept
Con (together) cept (to take)...singularity gives each single unit within the free will of choice to take (want) all given (need). That represents the wanted temptation one needs to resist.
It's only three if one counts together what all sets apart from one another. Inception > life > death represents one momentum and three states within...depending on ones choice to count together what nature sets apart.
God's law of Faith
Faith implies holding onto, which tempts one to ignore the setting apart of L(and) A(ir) W(ater) as different matter within the momentum of the same motion.
to hold their positions of power
The power of few represents many holding onto fiction, while ignoring ones position within reality.
Example...few issuing currency are not holding onto anything, but are discharging (issue) a current (currency) which many ignore to see.
Caveman
Aka man who caves aka hollowing out ones memory by ignorance, while allowing others to fill it up. Many are still cavemen; still sitting in Plato's cave; still caving into ignorance willingly.
Middle Ages
Only in the middle can there be age/aiw - "vital force, life". Age implies singularity...not plurality, since only one force (inception towards death) can vitalize each being (life).
All the suggested "ages" represent distractions from discerning self as reborn (renaissance age) or ignorant (dark age) or a mode within motion (modern age) or at the middle of all (medieval age)...
jews were mostly excluded from civilized society.
Civilized society implies domesticated gentiles herded together by each jew. A jew suggests the rhetoric ex (out of) clude (to close) to invert the minds of gentiles with contradiction (outwards vs inwards).
I wonder what changed.
All changes each one within...a jew amazes the mind (amazement) of gentiles into wondering/wandering in circles (logic), hence "they call me the wanderer...yeah, the wanderer...I roam around, around, around" aka the wandering jew shaping the kike/kikel - "circle" inside (logic) and outside (reason) of gentiles.
the kings of the ashes
Not kings...native of ash aka ashke (asche; ash) nazi (nati; native). King implies ruler/rule/reg - "to move in a straight line" aka nature delineating each being within.
a means to an end
Holding onto meaning tempts one to ignore being (life) moved from beginning (inception) towards end (death).
the greatest social media platform ever made
Platform aka flat like a plateau (inception towards death) and form (life)...that's the only platform for existence, and media implies formed in the middle of plat-flow.
The trick...social aka soc (together) i (within) al (all). An inversion of being set apart from one another. Nature doesn't collect users together, it sets each being apart from one another. It's suggested social-ism which tempts many together, while permitting few the central position.
myspace
Space/spatior (to wander) implies process (inception towards death) allowing potential (life) to wander in any direction. My implies possession, which prevents potential from wandering within procession.
you had to learn...to not look terrible
Terrible/terror (fear) aka being afraid of how one looks to others...that's vanity. Technology domesticates one to play make believe with others aka to deceive by looks within nature aka looksmaxxing aka pretending to be what one isn't as to distract others with pretension.
that was real engagement
En (within) gage (to bind) ment (mind) isn't real, but fake bondage of free will of choice. Few utilize technology to gauge many into engagement with one another.
One wants or not wants to engage with others...one needs to sustain oneself (life) apart from one another within all (inception towards death).
Building something = problem solved
Building a sum of things (something) ignores each thing (problem) within everything (solution). It's everything which dissolves (inception towards death) each thing (life) within.
Building a sum of things implies tikkun olam (repairing the world by bringing together) aka mosaic law aka few summoning many together.
Problem implies diverse; solution implies equal...equalizing problem destroys diversity.
gone the opposite direction
There can be (life) only one direction (inception towards death)...turning against one another distracts one from being directed. The only misdirection is ones free will of choice ignoring being within direction.
they don't want you to build anything
- THEY represents suggested pluralism by few...build by consent of each one, holding onto one another as many.
- DON'T represents suggested nihilism by few...build by consent of each one who chooses to ignore everything (perceivable) for nothing (suggested).
- WANT implies a conflict of reason (want vs not want)...build by many who are willingly fighting each other over any suggestion by few.
they want you scrolling
Scroll aka "to roll" implies circular thinking (logic) turning into circular conflict (reason). That's why the use of a Torah Scroll (instruction to mosaic law)... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Torah_scroll
The scrolling used on the internet represents the world wide instruction to mosaic law upon logical and reasoning gentiles.
a generation that thought itself code
Code implies the "compilation of laws" aka mishnah for teaching each jew and gemara to finish gentiles. That's the talmudic codex underneath any code suggested further along the line of process to distract many with unification (synthesis) from separation (analysis).
we call it progress
Calling implies "summoning together"...being (life) progressed (inception towards death) implies a setting apart from one another.
A jew suggests WE... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Royal_we to call gentiles together, as to distract each being from the one and only natural progress.
no
Where does one take nothing from?
explaining logic
Logic implies circular...not plain.
Stay the hell away from my threads.
Starting threads invites comments; commenting to a thread implies by free will of choice. Besides that...free doesn't require invitation, unless it's called freemasonry.
God's plan
Plan implies the representation of anything drawn on a plane...God implies plane (inception towards death) of existence (life). A jew sketches plans to tempt gentiles into circular conflicts, while distracting from linear delineation.
If one writes God is in control, then one ignores linear plane for circular plan aka con (together) trol (to roll)...
use AI to run your dead friend's account
Digital necromancy used to exploit those who ignore the need to let go for the want to hold onto.
could be a morbid alternative
Morbid/mori/mer- "to rub away; harm"...holding onto prevents alternation while harming one by rubbing against one another.
The internet aka world wide web restricts alternation, while tempting users to hold onto any artifice within mentally, which turns into real physical conflicts.
Nowhere under the definition of Patriot, does it say "Hold country above God"
Holding anything (nowhere; definition; patriotism; country; saying) above tempts one to ignore being (be) lowered (low) by God.
it's Blasphemy to proclaim that...
It's claiming, not what's proclaimed, which blasphemes all given by attempting to add a fault to it.
to proclaim that you love...
...implies consent to hate, thereby binding ones free will of choice into a conflict (love vs hate).
your wife, as she is not God
She isn't yours, but S(plit)HE aka the divine/divide of God into masculine (motion) and feminine (momentum) for each off-spring (matter) coming into being.
Others suggest you to take her into possession by the bond of matrimony aka wedlock, which tempts you to ignore that God divides each from one another.
I suspect that you do not understand ordered rule sets
a) If free will of choice chooses to stand-under, then "free" becomes "bondage", while permitting a chosen one to set ordered rules for ones choice.
b) Why suspect one another if God cannot do wrong? If God represents righteousness, then how did suspicion arose?
Replied before reading user name
Aka adapting instead of prejudging...
My mistake.
Did you took anything from free-will-of-choice? If God gives everything, then what could one miss by taking anything from one another?
Only when you keep
Can you keep your breath? For how long until you're forced to give away what never was yours?
Infancy implies adulteration towards elderly...only the adult mind has enough power to waste on the belief that anything can be kept.
Gold is a store of value
Value moves and cannot be stored. Within moving value exists evaluation, which can be tricked to ignore moving value...that ignorance represents storage.
Gold implies malleability of evaluation within value, and it's being used by few to tempt the evaluation of many to hold onto value, which makes the evaluation of many malleable to few.
in the process
Aka evaluation (perception) within the process of value (perceivable)...no storage but ignorance.
Fiat
Few tempting many to hold onto moving value becomes fiat...the moment one ignores moving value.
propped up by having a place to store
Aka ones memory choosing to ignore moving value by holding onto immovable value (fiat).
the extra fiat
Since value moves, the immovable fiat held onto, exponentially increases demand for extra value.
normally have nowhere to go and cause
Cause moves effect...few suggest norms (affixed rules of behavior) and nowhere (denial of everywhere) to affect ones ignorance of being moved as effect (life) within cause (inception towards death).
That's it.
Motion moves...matter declaring to one another "that's it" isn't the end of anything, but the ignorance of everything moving.
rugpull
Being within motion implies being (life) pushed (inception) and pulled (death) simultaneously...ignoring motion by holding onto matter represents the artificial rug put above ones sight, which always pulls life towards death.
entire economy
Only within entire can eco (to abide) nomy (to take) be shaped out by particulars. Motion neither abides; nor can it be taken...it's matter which can be tricked to abide motion, while taking hold of self and one another; which represents mental and physical materialism.
only the worst of humanity are the ones being affected
If those affected represent the worse of humanity, and those not affected represent the best of humanity, then what about those who implement affection to tempt humanity into a best vs worse conflict against one another?
Patriots concerned about Satanists
"And call no man your father upon the earth: for one is your Father, which is in heaven." ~Matthew
How isn't it satanic to ignore the above by using the label patriot/patri - "father" for one another?
beneath
Aka as above/so below...the linear origin for potential growth.
you...me
A circular conflict preventing potential growth.
If you had a way to see
Only within the way of all energy can one see...it's flow within which sight forms.
portal within ourselves
a) Port/per (to lead; pass-over) + al (all) aka all leading each one within through a pass-over aka the transfer of power (life) within energy (inception towards death).
b) Self implies singularity passing through one another by inter-course for off-spring. Within energy...self cannot be possessed, nor can any plurality be sustained.
God who is the source of energy itself
God; source; energy; self implies the flow causing each form within...it's the suggested label "God" tempting those who hold onto it to ignore flow, hence continuing to solidify "God" above source; energy; self etc.
All doesn't have a label until anyone within applies to self. Your free will of choice holds onto the suggested label "God" while superimposing it onto anything else, while ignoring that all flow separates each form within from one another.
Energy only moves, which empowers each matter within. Energy can be analyzed as en (within) + ergos (work) hence implying all work separating into each employed mind within.
how Zero Point tech works
Work implies moving energy...suggested zero (absence of quantity); point (end of sentence) and tech (artifice) tempts one to ignore that.
Energy implies singularity (one) sentencing life at inception towards point of death, while allowing free will of choice to shape artifice by ignoring natural.
instead of within us, he was getting it from within basic particles
Being implies particle (life) within base (inception towards death)...it's ones consent to the suggestion "zero point tech", which permits Tesla to get power from within basic particles.
Zero requires one to ignore self for it; point requires sentence to ignore self for it; tech requires being to ignore nature for it...by free will of choice. Consenting tempts one to ignore basis (perceivable) for extract (suggested).
tesla
Tesla aka "magnetic flux density" represents magnetic (ones consent) flux (all perceivable) density (ignoring perceivable by holding onto suggested).
What's the opposite of magnetic flux density? Electric form freely aka ones formed free will of choice for electing/selecting.
Few suggest the label "tesla" to distract many from discerning self within energy, while using the person Tesla to sell magnetic flux density as the distraction embedded within the implication of the label "tesla".
Nature doesn't label...labels are artificially shaped to distract from nature.
That is the theory but not exactly true.
Energy implies praxis (action) for each extract (reaction) within...others suggest theory to distract from praxis with a true vs false conflict called "reason".
Reasoning about theory implies extract vs extract in ignorance of praxis.
control the pathway to your inside
Con (together) trol (to roll)...that's what clogs the pathway of all energy moving through each ones power inside.
All energy comes from the outside
Energy implies all for each one within coming into being.
a) Luci (light) fer (to carry) implies motion setting free fire aka heat aka animation.
b) An animated fire place is called hearth aka heart (with a silent "age").
c) While burning...motion represents the ice for the burning heart animated within.
Here's a sleight of hand for those with eyes to see... https://genius.com/Survivor-burning-heart-lyrics