state department, eh.. what exactly do they do
In short...governing the estate of departed minds among others.
Governing implies control; estate implies possession; departed implies ignoring to be partial within whole. The few shape suggestions; which the many consent to uphold within their minds; hence claiming possession; which in return tempts them to ignore being partial (perception) within whole (perceivable)....mass consent permits exploitation by chosen few.
harry s truman
HARRY (Old English hergian; make war, lay waste, ravage, plunder) S (solomon; Hebrew Sh'lomoh; peace) TRUMAN (true man aka conformable to fact within motion).
"war vs peace" implies reason; which is established by ones consent to suggested fact, hence one conforming to another.
praying hands
Upwards pyramid (male) without balance (male/female) aka offense without defense.
emoji
Emotion (Latin emoveo, to move from) tempts one to ignore being (life) within motion (inception towards death). Motion implies offer (offense); being within implies resistance (defense).
How does one get others to ignore resisting motion? Emotional reactions.
a) what's easy to get in; but hard to get out of? A trap.
b) feels like being chained to a block within a crypt, huh?
they're going to incorporate little grains of truth in their bullshit, because that gives the bullshit more credibility
It doesn't matter how much others are suggesting...it's ones consent; belief; faith; creed etc. which gives it credibility aka creed-credit-bility.
Consenting to suggested feeds credit to those suggesting.
nobody takes...seriously
SERIOUS (important; weighty; momentous)...only within momentum (inception towards death) can one (life) take anything.
does not contribute anything to science or technology
In-between perceivable (science; scio; to know) and suggested (technology; artifice)...oneself represents CONTRIBUTE (impart) aka partial within whole.
They don't debate so there's nothing that they would win.
If reason (debate) can be won, then why does humanity keep reasoning about everything?
AI...isn't intelligent
a) INTEL'LIGENCE, noun (Latin intelligentia, from intelligo, to understand)...using Artificial intelligence (AI) implies ones consent to "stand-under" those suggesting it.
b) Artifice implies one ignorance of natural (perceivable) for artificial (suggested), hence ones submission (understanding) to another.
c) is vs isn't represents a conflict of reason shaped by ones consent to suggested nihilism (nothing), while ignoring perceivable (everything).
written by man
Others suggest WRITE (to impress durable) to distract one from RITE of passage as expression (life) within impressing (inception towards death).
In short...WRITE (durable) represents the inversion of RITE (perishable).
Free Speech
Speech binds ones free will of choice to the suggested definitions by others, while tempting one to ignore that nature doesn't utter words...it sounds.
is...
Perceivable sound was; before one can suggest through speech what is.
without reason
With vs without implies a conflict of reason.
why give...and then lock?
Consenting by free will of choice to a given suggestion; permits the one suggesting to choose for one.
Consenting to suggested establishes ignorant one (self) underneath chosen one (other).
claimed to travel out of their bodies while asleep to struggle against malevolent witches
- Wife: "did you fell asleep again?"
- Husband: "witch..."
- Wife: "what was that?"
- Husband: "Witch...I was totally hunting witches to secure our crops"
- Wife: "right..."
They worked together to fuck this world up.
Add Eugene Bleuler to that list aka the one who coined "schizophrenia", "schizoid", "autism", "depth psychology" and what Sigmund Freud called "Bleuler's happily chosen term ambivalence".
Bleuler and Freud conspiring to "conquer psychiatry"... https://files.catbox.moe/4ve91i.jpg
a) "Torches of Freedom" implies a burned offering (torching) of free (will of choice) within dom (inance of balance).
b) Propaganda (suggested information) is Everywhere (perceivable inspiration)...oneself is positioned as choice in-between perceivable need and suggested want.
c) Edward aka EAD (prosperity; wealth) WEARD (guardian)...the highest value within existence implies evaluation aka ones free will of choice aka ones guard of well being + Bernays aka BERO (bear) aka to bear ones burden as resistance (life) within temptation (inception towards death).
- TRUE, adjective - "being in accordance with the actual state of things"
a) If being implies reaction (life) within action (inception towards death); then accordance implies harmony aka harm to one.
b) instead of false; consider FALSETTO (feign; figure) aka form (life) of any thing as expressed by the outline or terminating extremities (inception towards death).
c) remember True Detective? To detect implies "bringing to light"...being alive implies from light (inception) towards dark (death), hence ones spark of life glimmering out.
Notice ASTRO (star) COSMO (world) NAUT (nautic; seafaring)...
I'm not antisemitic
Others suggested antisemitism towards your consent (want or not want)...you chose "not want", which fuels the suggested antisemitism by the chosen ones, while keeping you within a conflict of reason (want vs not want).
That conflict of reason among the gentiles represents the cut-off circumference; which in return permits the jews to erect a center among them.
i'm clearly not a chosen person
That represents suggested definism (I am) and nihilism (not) tempting others to consent (agree or disagree), hence choosing you.
it changes people and not for the better.
Inception towards death changes life...and not for the better.
One woman, a very excellent and successful southern lawyer...
A lawyer of laws as suggested by others; a success based on following suggested orders to take the place which another has left, and a position that cannot excel beyond submission.
In short: one under another one...under a chosen one.
from centrist to deepstate
a) -IST (centrist) implies ones consent to -ISM (centrism) aka ones submission to another. Ignoring this implies a deep-state of consciousness, buried underneath the suggestions by others.
b) being able to choose between perceivable (need) and suggested (want) implies being choice within balance (need/want) aka the center (perception) of ones surrounding (perceivable).
Others suggest centrism to tempt one to permit others by willing consent to represent self as the center...as the selected choice (French élite).
I don't know what Israel is doing.
a) erecting a center, while cutting off their circumference. Those who comprehend this will do anything to not be cut off too.
b) knowledge implies perceivable (inspiration); don't implies suggested nihilism (information)...the latter tempts one to confirm and hold onto; while the former inspires one to adapt and let go of, while resisting temptations.
Suggested "israel" implies a position somewhere; perceivable ISRAEL (Hebrew yisra'el) - "he that striveth with God" implies ones struggle (life) within temptation (inception towards death).
changed...totally different
Partial differences (life) can only exist within total change (inception towards death). A difference can never be total; since it implies being different from something else.
I have met 2
Being implies one apart from other ones. Others suggest pluralism (met; coming together) and collectivism (2) to distract partial one from self.
conservative
Inception towards death (ongoing loss) generates life (temporary growth) not for conservation (to preserve from loss), but for consumption (to grow within loss)...others suggest conservatism to tempt one to ignore that.
Black (absence of light) and White (pure light) cannot be perceived from within the visible spectrum. Only within spectrum can species mix.
This isn't about attacking white and black; but about tempting opposites into each other to corrupt the visible spectrum in-between. Why? Spectrum; species; special etc. implies particular aka apartheid...not togetherness.
Mixing many together sets few apart.
a) that's a fake jew. The real ones go "ka-ching" when you smack em.
b) consider dia-spora aka diametric-sporadic aka apart through center, which implies a collectivized circumference.
c) choice exists at the center of balance (need/want)...ignoring need (perceivable) for want (suggested) tempts one into imbalance (want vs not want), while leaving the suggesting ones at the center of balance. That's how you get a protected few at the center of a fighting many surrounding them.
d) BIS aka Bank of International Settlements...the few bank the trust of the many...the few are located INTERN (internal) NATION (a people), hence within the gentile nations as central banks...those consenting by trusting the suggested banks represent the settled minds (settlements).
the suggestions only get bolder as former ones fail or become stale.
Those who consent to suggested information are upholding it within ones mind/memory...that's where it fails or becomes stale. The weaker the many become; the bolder the few behave.
Did you see CNN's viewership numbers?
The 110,000? What's wrong with 220,000 viewers? As if FOX has 440,000 viewers...
Edward from Eduard aka EAD (prosperity) WEARD (guardian) HITZITG (heat)...what's the guarded prosperity of heat? ZOE (life).
psyop
Aka psycho-logical-operation. Logic implies reasoning (is vs is not) over suggested (jesus), while ignoring psyche (animating spirit aka perceivable).
Tempting one with suggested to ignore perceivable represents a "psyop".
"bend the rules" to their advantage.
a) RULE, noun (Latin rego, to make straight)...straight (inception towards death) advances odds (life).
b) the few tempt the many to ignore perceivable rule (straight) for suggested rules (bend). The consent of the many to the suggestions by the few permits the few to bend the rules at will.
c) it's the many who seek advantages by consenting to the suggestions, while the few comprehend that being (life) advanced (inception towards death) requires ones resistance.
In short...jews suggest progressivism to tempt gentiles to ignore resisting.
smack em around
Gentiles (circumference); jews (center)...jews utilize circumcision to cut off circumference as to protect center. Therefore; smacking jews around destabilizes gentiles.
a) male motion to fe-male momentum for trans-form within.
b) momentum of pure light (white) towards absence of light (black) for trans-formed visible spectrum of hue (color) man aka moving color.
c) being within momentum of motion implies as resistance (life) within temptation (inception towards death)...form needs to face motion (male), while resisting momentum (female).
Facing her (momentum) exhibits self; facing him (motion) expresses self.
d) ADAM (Hebrew adamah; ground) SCHRADER (German; tailor) aka cutting ground aka separate foundation aka to separate by suggestion the foundation of perceivable...the work of a free (will of choice) mason.
as long as it is translated
TRANS (transmutation of ingredient out of base) LATE (to draw from)...if one consents to a suggested book; then one draws from those suggesting it; while ignoring that written (words) is based within motion (sound).
One is being tricked to draw from what others write into motion; instead of being drawn (life) within motion (inception towards death).
Temporary growth (living) within ongoing loss (process of dying) implies a drawn sinus-curvature within a base-line.
in essence... a brutal way.
SENTIO aka sent (life) within action (inception towards death)...a brutal way.
actual rational processes
a) process of action (inception towards death) generates reactions (life).
b) ration implies "portion or fixed allowance of provision"...perceivable portion implies unit (Latin unus; one) aka one-self. Ones consent to suggestions by others implies a "fixed allowance of provision".
A fixed suggestion tempts one to ignore being within a moving process.
to be non-existent.
"to be" implies towards (liquid) being (solid); hence something solid (life) within everything liquid (inception towards death)...suggested nihilism (non) tempts one to ignore/deny that.
Denial aka DE (away from) NIHILO (nothing) AL (everything)...need (everything) or want (nothing) it's ones free will of choice.
Notice a jew erecting oneself at center while cutting off gentiles within circumference, like for example...staying financially afloat while others drown in debt.