▲ 1 ▼
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

You're

Trying to define others...defines self. Nature doesn't define (affix); it moves.

you need

Need (perceivable) existed before any you (perception) came to be....other yous (phonetic jews) suggesting what one needs, tempts one to ignore that.

stop spamming

a) energy cannot stop; those within can choose to hold onto affixed (suggested information); while ignoring motion (perceivable inspiration).

b) spam implies unsolicited offer. Free will of choice can only react (comment); not offer (post); hence... About free-will-of-choice: Post Score (0) Comment Score (10821)

Only nature offers everything (perceivable) to each one (perception) within.

mental illness

Ment (mind/memory) cannot get ill, since memory implies momentum of motion aka balance aka natural order. It's the choice of those within balance, who can put self at DIS-EASE by ignoring perceivable balance (need/want) for suggested imbalance (want vs not want).

Adapting to balance aka resonating within sound maintains oneself AT-EASE...momentarily.

The parasitic few are utilizing psychological analysis to define mental illness. The trick...LOGIC (reasoning about suggested) tempts one to ignore PSYCHE (adapting to perceivable) aka animating power aka ANAL'YSIS; noun - "separation of a compound body into its constituent parts " aka resolving partials (life) within whole (inception towards death).

tl; dr: all written above implies learning to teach self, while teaching self how to learn.

▲ 1 ▼
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

discussions and debates

Reasoning over suggested.

they want us

US reasons (want vs not want) among themselves over what THEY suggest...pluralism (us; they) is also suggested.

the burden of proof

Burdening oneself with suggested tempts one to seek confirmation (proof) from others...theism (the) is also suggested.

making one outlandish claim after the other.

A suggestion isn't a claim, but a temptation for others to claim (consent) it. Such claim (consent) is payed in credit (creed; belief; faith), which establishes the one suggesting as the consenting ones debtor.

Consider this...how does something OUTlandish get INTO one?

they advance their goals

Nature advances (inception towards death) growth (life)...if one chooses to resist temptations such as suggested progressivism (goals); then one grows.

build their networks

a) Ones consent puts one into the suggested web of others; like for example the suggested world wide web.

b) only within work (energy) can one build (solid within fluid).

▲ 3 ▼
free-will-of-choice 3 points ago +3 / -0

ARAB; noun (Hebrew arabha) - "desert" + DESERT; verb - "to leave, abandon"...that's why.

▲ 1 ▼
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

Disrespect: Respect?

RE (response to) SPEC (special; particular) + DIS (separation; parting from) SPEC (special; particular).

Disrespect implies ignorance of self; respect implies sustenance of self.

respect that you deserve

Aka disrespect of self by serving others.

quantity

Quantity of being implies ONEself among other ONEs (partials) within ONEness (whole).

In short...reasoning (respect vs disrespect) with others tempts one to ignore being responding (re) partial (spect).

earn

Others suggest one to URN (earn) a living; hence tempting one to consent to a suggested burned (cost aka caust; caustic; burning) sacrifice of self.

▲ 1 ▼
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

Rule 1: Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person.

▲ 1 ▼
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

how they managed to WIN?

a) by tricking growth (life) to choose loss (inception towards death) instead of growing self.

b) by rebranding wanting vs not wanting suggested progressivism into "win" vs "lose", hence tempting gentiles into fighting each other over a suggested outcome.

exiled

Consider being exile (life) within return (inception towards death).

persecuted

Consider that if one ignores need to resist perceivable for wanting suggested from others, then one persecutes (pursues) others.

Ask yourself if consumer persecutes merchant? Notice further that merchant selling temptation puts the persecution mark on merchant, before consumer pays to take it on self.

persecuted in Rome

Notice persecute (to pursue) and rome/roam (to wander)...coincidence?

somehow can't do anything wrong -- it's always Caesar that did

Right vs wrong reasoning is based on ones consent to suggested moralism...those who suggest moralism utilize cult of personality to sell it. Every product needs a face; an idol; a branding so that the product can be sold in the name of. Those idols represent corporations aka voices of death aka a liability shield.

the end result is serfdom, mass book burning, mass starvation, mass dumbing down

Already happened; never an end result...only a distraction from ongoing natural law.

complete annihilation

Being implies partial (life) within complete (inception towards death)...others suggest NIHIL (nothingness) to distract from ATION (action aka everything).

they are driven off....the end result is communism

"they" (plural) implies suggested commune-ism aka pluralism aka collectivism aka a few herding a many together.

Meanwhile...that which drives (inception towards death) sets itself apart (life), hence generating units (ones).

Stalin and Hitler

Have you noticed EISEN (steel; stalin) HAUER (hitter; hitler)? The narrative just keeps giving...

through reverse psychology

PSYCHE (animating power aka inception towards death) goes through one (life)...LOGY (logic; reason; conflict) implies turning (reversing) against one another.

Logy tempts one to ignore psyche...if one chooses reason over implication.

ended up rolling over and dying

There you go...reverse (rolling over) logy (ended up dying within conflicts of reason); while ignoring psyche.

That which animates (inception towards death) inspires resistance (life)...meanwhile; logic/reason tempts resistance against resistance, hence wasting animation.

elephant in the room

It's about the ignorance of the willingly blind, who're reasoning about what others suggest them they're looking at.

▲ 3 ▼
free-will-of-choice 3 points ago +3 / -0

Erecting the center; while cutting off circumference...the inversion of circumference (inception towards death) generating center (life).

Being implies comedy (life) at center of drama (inception towards death).

▲ 3 ▼
free-will-of-choice 3 points ago +3 / -0

Notice Mac suggesting scientism towards Charlie (want) and Dennis (not want), who both consent to the suggestion thereof, hence both being made bitches by Mac (daddy; the pimp)... https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=MacDaddy

Notice further, that MacDaddy dominating his bitches can suggest scientism in the name of others (aristotle; galileo; newton), while being viewed as above all of them by all the consenting bitches.

Meanwhile...SCI'ENCE, noun (Latin scientia, from scio, to know) aka to perceive...not to consent to suggested scientism by others.

▲ 1 ▼
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

The schools are teaching them that there will be no punishment for their actions.

Being a student implies "REACTING" to a teacher. Action (inception towards death) comes before reactions (life). This is why schools; teachers; education; information etc. is being suggested...to mimic action as to tempt reactions to ignore self for others.

▲ 1 ▼
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

kids want...they pretend that's what the kids needs.

What generates need...the suggestions by others or what one perceives?

Consider the following...PRETEND', verb - "to offer something feigned (suggested information) instead of that which is real (perceivable inspiration). Who wields the response-ability to take such an offer...others or self?

▲ 1 ▼
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

schools are mostly holding pens

Who let the kids go for others to hold onto them? Who ignores that OFF-SPRING implies a setting apart from one another; not a coming together for things to hold onto each other?

▲ 1 ▼
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

Schools don’t even teach anymore.

If schools taught before; then what lessons did the students learn for permitting the inversion of schooling?

indoctrinate kids to not know

a) DOCTRINE, noun (Latin , to teach)...ones consent to study the suggestions by another implies in-doctrination, hence placing oneself within the influence of doctrines.

b) to know knowledge implies to perceive perceivable...not ones consent to suggested definitions aka affixed meaning aka DOGMA, noun - "a settled opinion, a principle, maxim or tenet; a doctrinal notion, particularly in matters of faith and philosophy".

what gender

GEN'DER, noun (Latin genus, geno, gigno) - "to beget; to produce as an effect"...it's cause (inception towards death) which produces effects (life).

This isn't something to be learned from the suggestions by others; but solely about each ones growth of self discernment...or the ignorance thereof, while being affected by others.

by DrLeaks
▲ 2 ▼
free-will-of-choice 2 points ago +2 / -0

How could there be silence (absence of sound) for one person (per sonos; by sound) insane (in sanus; within sound)?

▲ 2 ▼
free-will-of-choice 2 points ago +2 / -0

The audacity...to...claim to really know

Aka audacity of claiming (suggested information) to know (perceivable inspiration).

hearsay.

One cannot hear (perceive) nature (perceivable) say anything...all suggestions by those within nature are hearsay aka bought (consent) and sold (suggested) among each other; while ignoring nature.

by DrLeaks
▲ 2 ▼
free-will-of-choice 2 points ago +2 / -0

number of his name

NAME (nombre; number) - "the designation of a unit" aka UNIT (unitas; unus) - "one"

beast

Aka BEing ASTute (discerning)...requires one to resist (need) temptation (want).

by DrLeaks
▲ 1 ▼
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

a) buying (consenting) and selling (suggesting) tempts one to ignore being (perception within perceivable)...FREE will of choice.

b) nonparticipation implies ones denial (non) of being reaction (part) within action (tion), hence taking (capio) the easy way out.

▲ 2 ▼
free-will-of-choice 2 points ago +2 / -0

The elites have to play both sides

Elite (selection; choice) can only exist in-between balance (need/want). Choosing to hold onto a suggested side establishes imbalance (want vs not want), while permitting those suggesting control over both sides.

The sides (want or not want) exist within ones consent mind, while the chosen ones suggest rebranding for those sides like...israel vs palestine; ukraine vs russia; good vs bad; winning vs losing; rich vs poor; us vs them; belief vs disbelief; left vs right; white vs black and so on.

▲ 2 ▼
free-will-of-choice 2 points ago +2 / -0
  • DEMOS (common people) + KRATOS (strength)

Ones consent to suggested common-ism (communism) permits others to collectivize ones (person) into many (people), which gives the chosen few the strength of the ignorant many...the strength to steer order followers.

Meanwhile in the minds of the ignorant..."I'm just following progressivism; why is everything digressing?"

In other words...trying to reach the finish-line ends the race.

▲ 2 ▼
free-will-of-choice 2 points ago +2 / -0

allowed to puppeteer your government,

Ones consent to suggested government gives others permission to puppeteer ones choice, hence controlling (govern) ones mind (ment).

two state solution

Solution (inception towards death) generates states (life) aka oneness (whole) generating ones (partials)....others suggest dualism (two) to distract ONE from self.

Nature cannot generate two; for all is one in energy. Test yourself: If energy is one, then two implies...?

▲ 3 ▼
free-will-of-choice 3 points ago +3 / -0

The power of the 'dark side' nowadays mostly reside on acknowledging

Consenting to a suggested side tempts one to ignore being choice in-between sides, hence keeping self in the dark (within ignorance), while permitting chosen ones to shine the light at whatever they choose one to focus on.

The power of a chosen one implies ones consenting choice, choosing another over self.

enforcing a false narrative to keep the power

FORCE, noun (Latin fortis; strength) - "momentum; the quantity of power produced by motion". The center (life) of momentum (inception towards death) is forced (loss) to resist (growth), which is how motion generates strength through force internally.

Sleight of hand: "may the force (inception towards death) be with you (life)".

The few suggest narratives; sermons; orations; stories etc. to tempt one to keep holding onto them, while ignoring the ongoing force aka the perceivable inspiration for each expression within.

  • Yoda: "Death is a natural part of Life, rejoice for those around you who transform into the Force"
  • Yoda: "Through the force (perceivable); things you will see (perception)"
  • Yoda: ""Anger, fear, aggression, the dark side of the Force, are they...easily they flow, quick to join you in a fight. If once you start down the dark path, forever will it dominate your destiny."
  • Yoda: "You must feel the Force around you. Here. Between You, Me, the Tree, the Rock, Everywhere"
  • Yoda: "The Way of Things (life). The Way of the Force (inception towards death).
▲ 1 ▼
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

warmongering slaver

a) slavery implies ones free will of choice to submit to another.

b) mongering implies the suggestions of others tempting ones free will of choice to consent.

c) if one consents (want or not want) to anything suggested; then one shapes a conflict of reason (want versus not want)...aka foundation of war.

the same

Sameness (inception towards death) differentiates itself (life)...ones consent to suggested the-ism (the) tempts one to ignore that.

by Gumball
▲ 1 ▼
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

City implies center...a jew erects self at center, while cutting off circumference. Why? As the inversion of circumference (inception towards death) generating center (life), which gentiles (cover/tile over generation) are ignoring.

▲ 1 ▼
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

Abolition of all religion

Ones consent to suggested implies religion (to bind anew)...others cannot abolish ones consent.

made to believe

Aka tempted by suggestion to consent by free will of choice.

Abolition of patriotism/nationalism

To abolish any -ism; one simply chooses to not suggest anything to another. Yet; what if it's hard to simply resist doing something tempting?

one family

One implies apart from one another. Family perpetuates through off-spring, hence a setting apart.

private property

Being implies private (life) within proper (inception towards death)...proper institutes (inception) and abolishes (death) private.

ordered governments

Natural order governs ones mind/memory...even when one ignores it for suggested governments.

The hankering of the mind is irresistible

Resistance (life) within temptation (inception towards death) feels a constant urge to ignore (want) resisting (need).

the plan of Illumination

Plane (inception towards death) brings the light; ignoring it for suggested plans dims ones sight with the darkness of ones ignorance.

▲ 2 ▼
free-will-of-choice 2 points ago +2 / -0

a) Nature sows (inception) and reaps (death) seasons (life). Sleight of hand: "seasons don't fear the reaper".

b) Others suggest corporations (corpus oration; voicing death); hence mimicking the reaper while scaring the living seasons (seeing-ones).

c) If solid (life) ignores fluid (inception towards death); then it turns LOOSE (loosh). Less resistance equals easier harvest.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›