evidence suggests
a) If it's EV'IDENT, adjective - "open to be seen; perceivable"; then it wasn't suggested...
b) Evidence aka EX (out of) VIDERE (to see)...watching what others show ones eyes to see is different.
waiting for the crescendo
CRESCENT, adjective - "Increasing; growing"...being implies temporary growth (life) within ongoing loss (inception towards death). Waiting for anything implies willfully ignoring the crescendo of being an instrument within sound.
lying
a) Both questions and answers imply as suggested by others; while ignoring perceivable solution as self.
b) A suggested "lie" implies the contradiction of a suggested "truth"...only if one consents to a suggested truth; can others suggest lies about it.
Nature doesn't shape suggestions (neither truth nor lies); it moves perceivable (change) into shapes (perception). Truth tempts one to hold onto a definition within procession; which only then permits others to exploit it with contradicting lies.
Letting go of truth; prevents others to wield lies...
c) Can you describe any "truth" that wasn't suggested by another aka a truth originating from perceivable nature?
a) The line in-between the pictures implies ones life being moved from inception towards death; while both pictures imply suggestions by others tempting one to ignore perceivable.
Suggested tempts one to want vs not want from others (imbalance); while perceivable implies being want (temptation) within need (resistance), hence ones struggle to sustain self as choice within balance.
b) Looking at "daily mail" implies ones consent to suggested, which permits others to define; redefine and contradict the suggested.
c) Notice that a "mail" can be utilized both to send towards others and to defend self...depending on ones free will of choice. Notice further that sending a letter tempts others to consent to "let" one send...whatever others choose.
a) If you build it; then he will come.
b) What if shoes (jews) have no soles (souls)?
to draw a line
Line (inception towards death) draws sentences (life). Others suggest sentences to draw lines, while pointing towards outcomes.
I don't know
Everyone knows (perceives) everything (perceivable)...others suggest nihilism (Latin nihilo; nothing) to tempt one to de-nial perceivable for suggested "don't".
We're all human
a) Human implies color (hue) of man.
b) Man (motion; light) generates Woman/womb-man (momentum; spectrum of color) for TRANS-FORM (matter; shades aka the interception, cutting of or interruption of the rays of light).
c) Others suggest pluralism (we) to tempt partial (one) to ignore whole (all).
son of
a) Father (motion) through mother (momentum) into child (matter)...no exceptions. Child/shield/schild/skildus/skel - "to divide; split, separate".
b) SON (Latin filius) + Daughter (Latin filia) imply FILI - "opening; opportunity" aka OP PORTO UNUS...to bring forth one.
Was...thor; memnon; tithonius; laomedan; ilus; trois; ericthonius; darius; zerah etc.
VERB (expresses action) was perceivable before a NOUN (name; combination of sounds by which a thing is called) can be suggested.
Perceivable sound moves; before one can shape it into suggestible words, which tempt others to hold onto definitions (definite/affixed), which makes them deaf phoneticians within phonos (sound).
rise of nationalist
a) -ist (nationalist) implies ones consent to suggested -ism (nationalism); hence ones submission to another...only resisting that rises ones resistance.
b) Few utilize suggested -isms to accumulate consenting -ists, which within the ongoing procession of nature implies a temporary indigestion (dyspepsy).
Tikkun olam (healing the world by bringing together) tempts the dis-ease of dysepsy among gentiles...if consented to.
Notice the use of "holocaust" as the foundation to be for or against israel...if one chooses either side; then one consents to holocaust.
The only foundation for suggestion by others (fiction) implies perception as self (reality)...others will tempt one with suggested foundations into conflicts of reason (for vs against). Resisting temptations, grows ones resistance.
explain how this could possibly be true
a) POS'SIBLE, adjective (Latin possibilis, from posse, power) - "that may be or exist; that may be now, or may happen or come to pass"
To be implies power/potential/possibility...using that power to consent to any suggested explanations by another can make it true (want) or false (not want) for self.
b) Explain implies EXpressed power (life) within PLANE power (inception towards death). Plane implies even (balance) for odds (choices) within, hence ones plane of existence.
Notice further that PLANE, verb - "to free from inequalities of surface" implies being free (will of choice) within (in) equal (balance) of exterior (surface).
other than
OTH'ER, adjective [Heb.] - "not the same; different"...only within sameness (whole) can there be differences (partials) aka one among one another.
THAN, adverb - "to express comparison between what precedes and what follows"...that implies oneself drawing comparisons among one another, while ignoring that what precedes and what follows implies a continuation of motion (process of dying) for those temporary residing (living) within.
here's why
"Why" implies perceivable origin; "here is" implies a suggestion made within perceivable origin...ones consent to latter; tempts one to ignore former. Ones ignorance permits others to exploit one.
Before one can suggest what "is"; everything perceivable "was". Nobody can suggest what is without tempting others to ignore what was perceivable, and no other can discern for self the difference between reality (perceivable) and fiction (suggestion), hence "self" discernment...
acceleration in greed
a) Velocity (inception towards death) implies constancy; resistance (life) differs.
b) Generosity implies all perceivable generated for each ones perception; while greed implies ones consent to suggested. Holding onto latter tempts one to want more and more, hence greed aka ardent desire aka appetite. Generosity implies that which cannot be held onto aka the constant hunger (need) driving different appetites (want).
c) What greed perceives as acceleration implies its one diminishing of resistance (life) within velocity (inception towards death).
evidence of the greed
That which is evident to ones perceiving eyes moves generously; holding onto suggested evidence implies ones greed...others exploit those who hold onto within that which moves.
science is conclusive
SCI'ENCE, noun (Latin scientia, from scio, to know) aka to perceive perceivable...conclusion implies thrust together; perceivable solution sets each ones perception apart from one another.
Science is dissolving. Ones consent to what another suggests "is"; establishes a conclusion within ones mind/memory. Holding onto conclusion tempts one to ignore resisting (life) dissolution (inception towards death).
it's not just a few - it's a lot.
a) No matter how few or many are suggested; each one is implied within perceivable.
b) "casting a lot" implies suggested pluralism (we) tempting perceiving singular (one) to ignore self for others. The biblical "lot" is suggested for his journey with abraham (father of multitude)...
c) LOT, noun - "that by which an event is committed to chance (effect of an unknown cause)"...being implies effect (life) within known cause (inception towards death), hence positioning one at the known-ledge in-between.
d) Numbers 26:55: "...divided by lot"...number (designation of a unit) aka unit (unitas; unus; one) implies oneness (whole) dividing into many ones (partials).
Others (chosen ones) invert this by casting ones into a lot (e pluribus unum; out of many; one), which nature continuously divides aka rips apart.
a) Why? Energy aka origin of all powers within. Why else?
b) Like? Different!
c) Are those within mystery schools behaving alike or different from the "norm"?
d) If one seeks "likeness", then differences remain mysterious to oneself.
When do we begin...expulsion.
If singular (one) consents to suggested pluralism (we); then that implies "impulsion". Only oneself can resist taking others in; while being (life) within expulsion (inception towards death).
Notice that while a jew suggests expulsion; he erects self at center; while cutting off gentiles. Therefore; a jew prevents others to come in; while a gentile seeks to drive others out.
a) Case for disposition (shrine) implies ones memory, because only there can suggested information be momentarily deposited, while perceivable momentum goes on. Case also implies cover; hence ones consent to suggested covering perceivable with ones ignorance.
b) FEZ; FES; FESS; fateri (to admit); fasi (to speak) aka ones consent (admit) to suggested (word) over perceivable (sound) aka a con-fez-ion/confession. This also ties admission into fasces; faski (to bundle).
Edit: What comes first...cover on head (fez) or cover within head (fess)?
a) Suggested emancipation (freedom from bondage) tempts one to ignore that only within dominance (inception towards death) can one be free (life); and that bondage to others implies ones free will of choice consenting to being bound aka Religion (Latin religio; to bind anew).
Emancipate aka MANUS (hand) CAPIO (to take)...choosing to manually take (consent) from another (suggestion).
One cannot take without ignoring that all perceivable is given to each ones perception for free. To take implies ones free will of choice to want to take possession of aka to hold onto aka to seize aka to occupy.
Reality implies work (energy)...anything inside reality implies minds employed (employment) within work.
b) A chosen one cannot be held in bondage; it's ones choice choosing a chosen ones suggestion, which holds oneself within bondage. A chosen one sold bondage to others; utilizes consenting slaves to erect self at center; while cutting others off from circumference.
jewish ethnicity
- ETH'NICAL, adjective (Latin ethnicus; Gr. from nation from the root of G. heide, heath, woods, whence heathen)... https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/Ethnic
- HE'ATHEN, noun - "a pagan; a Gentile; one who worships idols, or is unacquainted with the true God"... https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/Heathen
"jewish ethnicity" represents a contradiction (jew/gentile) to many, while only a few can comprehend the implication of you/jew (life) within generation/gentile (inception towards death).
Hidden knowledge for others; a choice to hide from knowing (perceiving) for oneself...when consenting to suggestions by others.
jewish religion
Religion (Latin religo; to bind anew)...it's on you/jew to bind yourself to another when consenting (buy) to suggestions (sell), hence binding self by transaction into a contract.
Before branding a jew as bound...ask yourself if he sells others into bondage? Next; ask yourself if ignoring perceivable sound for suggested words makes oneself "spell-bound" to others? What could be a bigger spell-bound than YOU/JEW?
not the same thing
Same (inception towards death) differentiates into things (life) internally/inherently. Only within sameness (ongoing loss) can there be differences (temporary growth).
Others suggest nihilism (Latin nihilo; nothing; not) and theism (the) to distract one from discerning this for self.
sect embedded around the world
a) Only within world/vault can there be a separation/division (Latin seco/sect) within surrounding (around).
b) Suggested EMBED'DED - "inclosed in surrounding matter" tempts one to ignore that surrounding motion (inception towards death) sets matter (life) free.
Ones free will of choice is open to respond to all perceivable surrounding...while ones consent to suggestions incloses one to others, hence narrowing ones focus within perceivable reality to a tiny speck of suggested fiction, which those suggesting are expanding (infinite space) and contracting (atom without division) at will...
not until the late 1800'sG when every thing changes
a) Everything changes; because each thing (life) exists within change (inception towards death).
b) 1800 according to which calendar...February, 2024 or Shevat - Adar I, 5784?
c) Can "nothing" change?
religious sect
- Religion (Latin religo; to bind anew) implies binding together.
- Sect (Latin seco; to separate) implies setting apart.
Ones consent to suggested words; permits others to put contradiction together (religious sect); while tricking oneself to ignore being apart (perception) within whole (perceivable).
change their odds
Only within even (balance) can odds (choice) exist...increasing odds imbalances self. How does ones choice increases odds? By consenting to chosen one's suggestions.
quite the opposite
- QUITE, adverb (from quit; that is, primarily, free or clear by complete performance) - "completely; wholly; entirely".
Only within whole can partials be in opposition to one another. Consenting to suggested the-ism tempts one into opposition (conflicts of reason) with another.
your pictures
A moment captured by many; willingly given into storage of few; while ignoring that momentum (inception towards death) cannot be captured/stored by those living within.
Take any picture of yourself...it isn't you; you cannot take possession of yourself; you exist apart from whatever you try to hold onto; you try to link a resembling medium with a fading memory, while ignoring that holding onto semblance destroys difference (life) within sameness (inception towards death).
PIC'TURE, noun (Latin pictura, from pingo, to paint) aka PAIN/AINT aka phantom pain...
the world collect all data
a) DA'TA, noun - "things given, or admitted"...admission (consent) to things given (suggested information) tempts one to ignore being (life) in-between admit (inception) and dismiss (death).
b) World/vault implies repository for the dead, and being able to RE (respond to) POSIT (positioned; placed; situated) implies being within (life) process of dying (inception towards death).
Vault/world sets apart; those withing suggested collectivism to tempt together.
'intellectuals'. It's a cult.
Cultivated by ones consent to suggested intellectual-ism, hence ones choice to stand-under (understand; Latin intelligo) another.
When did intellectuals begin ruling?
IN'TELLECT, noun (Latin intelligo, to understand); hence from the moment one chooses to "stand-under" another.
graduation
GRAD'UATE, verb (Latin gradus, a degree) aka portion (life) of progression (inception towards death) within motion (tion).
Mystery
Nature reveals everything (perceivable) to each one (perception)...choosing to ignore this conceals perceivable (reality) underneath suggested (fiction).
based on tradition
Motion (tion) delivers (trado) each matter within....choosing to ignore this embases (to reduce by admixture) one aka self deprivation of self discernment, while permitting others to redefine basis of being.
focus everything on the afterlife
Progressivism aka tempting ones focus towards suggested outcomes; while ignoring perceivable origin.
this is some death cult shit
It ain't about cultivating death; but about distracting life from cultivating self within the process of dying.
afterlife
Suggested "after" tempts one to consent to "behind" aka being backwards, while ignoring "before" aka forwards (inception towards death) being (life).
aren't allowed
a) Those aren't allowed by others are seeking permission from others.
b) Being implies per/by (life) mitto/to send (inception towards death).
c) Matter (living) permeates/permits motion (process of dying).
automatically deported
a) Auto (inception towards death) generates manual (life).
b) Others tempt manual to de-port (carry division), hence tempting one into recess (suggestion), while ignoring to be vessel (perception) within motion (inception towards death).
Perception needs to balance within perceivable (need/want); suggestion (want vs not want) tempts one to carry division, which imbalances ones choice.
- M'ARK, noun (Latin mercor, to pass) - "sign of distinction"
- SPOT, noun - "mark on a substance made by foreign matter"
a) Mark (perceivable) - Substance (perception) - Spot (suggestion).
b) If substance consents to spot, then it (life) crosses the line (inception towards death).
c) Sleight of hand: "Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind"
a) Suggested words are things within this world held onto; perceivable sound cannot be held onto. Sound (entire) differentiates itself into things (instruments)...
b) Will implies want implies love implies ones choice to hold onto; while ignoring the need to let go.
transform...to be like
Transformation implies from whole (same) into partials (difference)...others suggest likeness to tempt one to hold onto alike, while ignoring to sustain oneself apart from one another.
body of god
Body implies frame (momentum) of animation (motion) for matter within.
From the christian perspective...inception towards death (momentum) implies body of god (motion); for each anointed one (matter) living within. The issue...matter holding onto a suggested word (god) to describe motion/movement/that which moves mind.
Could you rewrite one of the "bad bot" sentences into a "good bod" sentence...or dare I say...into your own words?
How about this one...Before one can suggest what "is"; everything perceivable "was"? What's bad about it; and how could I write it less bad?