- TYR'ANNY, noun - "arbitrary exercise of power"
- 'ARBITRATE, verb - "to decide"
DE (down from) CIDE (kill; fall down)...ones consent to the suggestions by another implies ones down fall; submission; self sacrifice.
AAAAA-mazing...isn't it?
a) The first comment: "This speech makes me proud to be Scottish. And I'm from Bangladesh."...that's how jews meme gentiles.
b) MEME; noun - ""an idea, behavior, or style that spreads from person to person, introduced by evolutionary biologist Richard Dawkins in "The Selfish Gene," coined by him from Greek sources, such as mimeisthai "to imitate".
Aka monkey see; monkey do. Imitating (similar/equal) others instead of being different.
who will enforce the "laws" of the land?
Natural L(and) A(ir) W(ater)...the only force (momentum of motion) that exist for the matter within.
to preserve freedom
a) FREE will of choice implies within DOM-inance of balance...only within balance can there be choice.
b) DOM (inception towards death) doesn't preserve FREE (life)...it offers temporary growth within ongoing loss, which implies adaptation of choice within balance.
c) Towards (to) implies motion...free (choice) dom (balance) implies matter within momentum of motion. Matter is offered a momentary choice to sustain self within momentum of motion.
Others suggest preserve aka PRAE (before) SERVARE (to keep safe) as the inversion of being (life) within harm (inception towards death).
speech
a) Speech (articulation of sound) implies as suggested by others, which tempts one to ignore perceivable "natural sound".
b) FREE (perception) within DOM (perceivable) can be deceived with liberty (suggestion).
LIB'ERTY, noun - "freedom from restraint"...only while restraint (balance) can one be free (choice).
c) Speech implies a liberty for many by suggested words from few, while using LETTERS aka ones consent to LET another ones suggestion shape words (artifice) out of sound (natural).
Letters btw go back to RU'NES/RHYMES - "consonance of sounds" aka ACCORD - "concert; harmony of sounds; the union of different sounds".
Why is that an issue? Because SOUND, adjective (Latin sanus) - "entire; unbroken" differentiates itself into each in sanus (within sound) per sonos (by sound) aka into each ones structured-mind-within (in-stru-ment)....suggested "insane person" tempts one to ignore that.
- READY (quick to receive)
- TO (towards) or FOR (forwards)
- TAKE (to get hold or gain possession of)
- OFF (separation to distance)
The conspiracy in that...tempting ones consent to readily take suggestions by others, which tempts one forwards/towards outcomes; while separating/distancing one from origin.
we landed
a) 55 years and counting and the minds of the many are still afloat reasoning about a suggested landing by few.
b) Natural L(and) A(ir) W(ater)....that's the only LAND of the free and the home of the brave. Reasoning about suggested implies ones denial to land on perceivable foundation.
radiation
- RADIA'TION, noun (Latin radiatio) - "emission (inception) and diffusion (death) of rays (life) of light".
- DAM'AGE, noun - "any hurt, injury or harm to one's estate"...ignorance/denial of radiation hurts; injures and harms the state of ones being.
Ayh do not buy
"not" was sold as suggested nihilism (Latin nihilo; nothing) by others, and ones consent buys into it.
we...we...we...we...
Singular (one) speaking in the name of plural (we) aka that which nature sets apart; aggregating itself with others, while pondering the loss of control over self...
Foundation (perceivable origin) is for building upon; intention (suggested outcome) distracts from foundation. In other words...nature offers the only foundation to build upon; those within tempt each other to focus on what to build as to distract from nature.
Nature implies generation; each one within implies reaction. If reaction ignores generation it cannot re-generate.
a) It's ones consent to any suggested -ism by another, which permits others to define (idolatry); redefine (revisionism) and contradict (talmudic reasoning) the suggested information at will.
If one resists the suggested -ism; then one can discern self within reduction aka RE (response to) DUCO (lead) TION (action) aka reaction (life) within action (inception towards death).
b) Suggested reductionism as the "sum of all things" tempts one to consent to e pluribus unum (out of many, one) aka tikkun olam (healing the world by bringing together) aka abrahamism (father of multitude) aka equality (same) through diversity (difference) aka united states; united nations; european union; uniformity; university; unisex; unicode; universal basic income; unicef; united kingdon aka mass migration; multiculturalism; miscegenation; mongrelization etc.
In short...reductionism tempts together; while nature generates partials within whole. Not a SUM of things; but EACH thing apart from one another.
Being implies apartheid (perception) within wholeness (perceivable).
c) FAMILIAR; noun - "demon, evil spirit that answers one's call". The Latin plural, used as a noun, meant "the slaves"... https://www.etymonline.com/search?q=familiar
know the meaning
Meaning (suggested information) contradicts knowledge (perceivable inspiration).
Reductionist...
-ist implies consent to -ism...where did I consent to suggested reductionism?
Address the argument
a) A mind arguing over suggested ignores to adapt to perceivable.
b) Address implies being (life) moved in a straight line (inception towards death)...addressing others tempts one to ignore that.
aware of the context
Consenting to suggested CON (together; with) TEXT (to weave) constricts ones awareness.
Few suggest an internal net (internet) to weave consenting many into its world wide web, which in return permits few to "pull at the very fabric of life until there's nothing left but a thread"... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=He1TntAK2fs
autistic
The jew who coined autism and schizophrenia (eugene bleuler) and the jew coined father of psychoanalysis (sigismund schlomo freud) conspired to "conquer psychiatry"... https://img.gvid.tv/i/3gc1x1nk.jpg
Psychoanalyzing others as autistic implies being conquered.
to account
ACCOUNT', noun - "a registry of a debt or credit"...it's why I resist giving credit/creed/consent.
What he meant is the perception of
a) Perception implies in response to what WAS perceivable...responding to what others suggest IS tempts one to ignore that.
b) Mean/medius/middle implies being center (perception) of surrounding (perceivable)...others tempt one off-center with suggested MEDIA.
c) One cannot define meaning...only motion can establish matter (life) at the center of momentum (inception towards death). Momentum implies balance within motion, and center of balance implies each ones free will of choice. Holding onto a definition imbalances ones choice.
To define implies to affix, which is why few suggest definitions to tempt many to affix suggested meaning/media (information) within mind/memory, while ignoring perceivable inspiration...which moves and cannot be held onto.
That's a non sequitur
a) "that is non" implies "something is nothing"...a contradiction in terms.
b) "a" implies "a partial within whole"...how could a partial within whole perceive "nothing"?
c) NONE SEQUITUR - "in logic, "an inference or conclusion that does not follow from the premise"...logic/reason is based on the premise of ones consent to the suggestion by another.
Consenting to suggested implies following those suggesting it, while ignoring that perception (life) needs to resist perceivable (inception towards death) aka matter needing to resist momentum of motion for the sustenance of self.
Logic/logos (suggested words) tempts one to ignore pathos (perceivable sound). Motion operates on implication (if/then), hence if motion (inception towards death); then matter (life).
Matter tempts each other to ignore motion for reasoning (want vs not want; true vs false; yes vs no; good vs bad etc.) over suggested definitions...which ones consent affixes within ones mind/memory.
It's ones free will of choice to adapt to perceivable implication (balance) or consent to suggested reason (imbalance)...those who ignore "ones choice" for suggestions by "chosen ones" are permitting others to exploit them, which is how a few manages to exploit a many.
not truth itself
a) What can you tell me about the truth of "no; not; nothingness" and the "self" thereof?
b) What if suggested nihil-ism (Latin nihilo; nothing) tempts one to de-nial perceivable (everything)? What if nothing implies ones denial/ignorance of everything?
Sleight of hand: "Neverending story confronted by the Nothing"... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Neverending_Story
not truth itself which is absolute and unchanging
a) Absolute implies AB (away from) SOLVERE (to loosen, untie, release, detach)...a moving/changing process.
b) What if a moving whole separates itself into partials? What if internal separation generates resistance (life) within velocity (inception towards death) aka temporary growth within ongoing loss aka solid matter within fluid motion?
c) UN- implies "prefix of negation"...what if that implies ones choice to deny/ignore change?
c) How could one hold onto truth without compressing it within self? How can there be a differentiation in-between true and false without ATION (action/motion)?
d) What if the only thing which cannot change are the rules of how change operates? What if those rules allow growth of self discernment by those within change? What if rule implies "to direct in a straight line"?
a) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Triple_parentheses
b) PAREN'THESIS, noun (Gr. to insert) - "a sentence, or certain words inserted in a sentence"
- Living within process of dying implies ones inserted life sentence.
- Ones consent to suggested (words) over perceivable (sound) implies a double insert.
- Those suggesting gaining consent based permission to write within the inserted implies a triple insert.
In other words...ones perception within all perceivable implies single insert; suggested information by others implies dualism aka double insert; and those suggesting being permitted to define (idolatry); redefine (revisionism) and contradict (talmudic reasoning) the suggested implies trinitarianism aka a tripple insert.
"I'm mad as hell, and I'm not gonna take it anymore!"
If that's what you took from it; then you're still working within the net of others. Re-watch when the jew speaks... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yuBe93FMiJc
- HAP'PEN, verb - "to come by chance"
- CHANCE, noun - "effect of an unknown cause"
a) Few suggest "happening" to distracts many from discerning to be effect (perception) within cause (perceivable), hence KNOWL'EDGE, noun - " perception of that which exists"
b) Another word for happen is "occurrence" aka OCCUR; verb - "meet in argument", which is why many are reasoning against each other over what's happening.
c) The decision to think about what happened or if it happened, tempts one to ignore the decision already made to ignore perceivable for suggested "news".
One perceives N(orth) E(ast) W(est) S(outh) from the center thereof, while focusing on suggested NEWS reduces ones sight within surrounding.
truth passes through three stages
So truth changes. If one applies change to truth it becomes a lie.
First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.
If self-evident is the goal, and others (ridiculed, opposed) are the obstacle, then why is truth suggested by others?
- Another: "I have truth"
- Self: "I mock you; beat you, and take truth from you"
- Another: "I don't have truth..."
agree about politeness
a) Agree vs disagree...always in conflict with each other.
b) Polite/Politic...used by few to smooth the rude masses.
We are adults
How does a singular (one) mature into a plural (we)? What if ignoring self for others implies immaturity?
helps society function.
Function implies "discharge"; society implies "aggregation of persons"...the latter implies putting together; while the former implies taking apart.
Few suggest society-ism (socialism) and community-ism (communism) to tempt many together; which nature then sets apart aka dis (life) charge (inception towards death).
social lubrication
Lubrication of partials within whole is required to reduce friction among partials...society tempts partials into each other to generate friction.
Furthermore; solid (life) within fluid (inception towards death) implies each ones unction aka anointment - "set apart; consecrated with oil" aka male (motion) through female (momentum) for setting apart transform (matter).
current state of affairs...we can change the world.
a) current implies change.
b) CHANGE, verb- "to cause to pass from one state to another; to alter, or make different" aka to alter (life) from one state (inception) towards another (death).
radical honesty
Honest/honor (equitable) implies in dealing with others; radical/radius/race/ray implies as partial within whole.
Consider being ray (matter) within spectrum (momentum) of light (motion)...that's radical. Matter dealing with other matter implies superficial in ignorance of radical.
Sleight of hand: "no honor among thieves". Ignoring perceivable by taking suggested implies theft.
use truth as a weapon
Instrument of offense/defense implies ones free will of choice...choosing a suggested side within a conflict of reason (truth vs lies) disarms ones weapon of choice.
Holding onto suggested truth contradicts ones FREE will of choice; while binding self to a chosen ones suggestion.
implant ideas
It's ones consent to suggested ideal-ism which plants suggested information into ones mind/memory as "true" or "false".
Idea (that which is seen) implies as perceived by oneself...not as shown by another ones suggestions.
I don't wish to offend
That choice to wish/want to not offend another implies ones ignorance of needing to adapt to what nature offers.
All perceivable towards ones perception implies offer; while suggestions by others tempt one to take offense.
The bread and butter
Suggested bread and butter tempts ones appetite; perceivable hunger forces ones adaptation.
live in fear
Fear implies focusing on suggested outcome (death); being alive implies within origin (inception towards death). Others suggest outcomes to tempt ones focus to ignore origin.
Fear implies APPREHEN'SION, noun - "taking or arresting; the operation of the mind in contemplating ideas, without comparing them with others, or referring them to external objects"...
Sleight of hand: "fear is the mind-killer".
evil forces
There's only one force (inception towards death) that generates life...ignoring this for suggested "evil forces" inverts ones mind....EVIL/LIVE.
find the edge
KNOWL'EDGE, noun - "perception of that which exists".
Can one keep momentum? Try keep running...
a) WEALTH /WEAL/WILL...others suggest wealth as "prosperity; external happiness" to distract one from being free "will" of choice within a balance based system. Consenting to wealth decreases will.
b) AR-AM-CO aka Arabian-American Oil Company.
c) OIL (oleum; aelan; fire) + COMPANY aka com (together; with) pa (to feed)...a burned offering.
d) Look at the graphic...taking the two towers down makes it easier to discern the PROPHETS foretelling PROFITS.
e) Insane (Latin in sanus; within sound)...that's where person (Latin per sonos; by sound) comes to be.
f) SAUDI (Arabic sa'd) - "happiness"...it's just a jew fucking with the ignorance of gentiles.
candace owens
OWEN (Greek eugenes) - "well born" + CANDI; KATTU - "sugar; condensed"...reducing something to a denser form by means of eugenics (dysgenics). Now look at her husband...George Farmer aka Greek Georgos - "husbandman, farmer". How Orwellian... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Animal_Farm
- Within fiction:
Repute; verb - "to believe (that something is so)" aka a gentiles consent to believe that what a jew suggests (candice owens) is so.
- Within reality:
Reputation aka ones response (re) to given (putare) action (ation).
Those who celebrate (praise; raise) others are willingly lowering themselves...why would those being raised look down upon those raising them?
The trick...it ain't a pedestal being raised for few; it's the many digging a pit for themselves.