a) Worth of ship implies measuring animation....worshiping animals implies holding onto; while ignoring being animated.
Applied to topic...holding onto memories about dog, while ignoring momentum of children.
b) If one measures up; then one keeps self down.
Welcome back.
How about this? Equator/Ecuador - "which runs through it"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/Ecuador#etymonline_v_32136
Aka which (inception towards death) runs through it (life) aka sameness running through differences.
Equator/equate - "to make equal". Nature doesn't make equal; it differentiates each one within from one another. Can you show me equal without putting yourself at odds with whatever you show me?
a) What am I covering up? What do I shill for? Where does the potential for you to suffer annoyance originate from?
b) Fed/federal implies "covenant, league, treaty, alliance" aka a coming together...everything I write is about nature setting apart.
Look no further than free-will-of-choice
a) Looking/locking restricts free will of choice.
b) How could one look at "no"?
c) Further implies farther along, hence going with the flow instead of resisting (life) it (inception towards death).
you want a fake
Need implies real (perceivable); want implies fake (suggested)...its ones free will of choice to discern or ignore this.
Are ALL accounts here completely authentic?
a) ALL (perceivable) authorizes each ones (perception) free will of choice.
b) Ones consent to the suggestion of another implies taking on a debt aka an account. Therefore...accounting interdicts authorization, while re-authorizing another (chosen one) over self (ones choice).
c) One (growth) implies deficiency within all (loss)...complete (having no deficiency) contradicts being, which is why a jew suggests perfectionism to trick gentiles to aim at reaching completion.
would be the best way to subvert this place
Suggesting "best", which establishes a conflict of reason (best vs worse); which can then be rebranded into "upvote vs downvote" for the gentiles to fight each other over, while ignoring that there's only one way (inception towards death) for each one within (life).
Ones consent implies ones SUBmission, and the resulting conflict of reason implies turning against (verto; versus) others, hence sub-version.
How can you change the consensus?
All changes (inception towards death) into each one (life) by internal differentiation...a jew suggest gentiles to come together (con); while ignoring differentiation of sense (sensus).
In short: One can only sense moving differences...suggested "consensus" inverts that.
all shapes and form
A jew suggest AND (conjunction) to tempt gentiles to ignore that flow (inception towards death) shapes form (life) by setting apart...not by joining together.
you will never suspect
Suspect/suspicio aka sub (under) specio (view)...focusing on another narrows ones sight. Look at this... https://www.wordhippo.com/what-is/the-opposite-of/suspect.html aka knowledge as the opposite of understanding.
their different personas
Per sonos (by sound) implies differentiation (ones perception) by same source (all perceivable)...a jew suggests pluralism (they) to distract singular (one) from discerning this for self.
A jew can utilize different personas because a gentile ignores being a different instrument within same sound, when joining other gentiles.
No, not everyone who disagrees with me is a shill
a) SHILL, verb - "to put under cover; to sheal; to shell".
b) Suggested nihil-ism (Latin nihilo; nothing) tempts one to put everything perceivable under the cover of ones wiling ignorance.
c) Agree vs disagree implies a conflict of reason aka a conflict shaped by ones consent to suggested fiction, while ignoring perceivable reality.
In short...consent; ignorance and reason are the foundation of shilling, and it's ones free will of choice to put that cover over self.
All perceivable is the only source for ones perception...authorizing suggestions by others tempts one to ignore that.
jews are...
...suggesting numbers; numerology; gematria; gemara to distract each consenting ONE from discerning self as a partial unit (one) within whole (oneness).
they give
Nature gives (perceivable); those within tempt each other to take (suggested). Taking (ones choice) gives oneself away to another (chosen one).
are not the same
Same (all perceivable) generates differences (ones perception)...others tempt one with likeness (suggested) to ignore that. If many consent alike to a suggestion by few, then each different one thereof mimics sameness.
Example...wearing a uniform, while following orders, as to not stand out.
why did they lie
Because you hold onto truth, while ignoring that nature moves. Utilizing the contradiction (lie) of what you hold onto (truth) permits others the opportunity to exploit you.
Holding onto something within motion implies spending resistance within velocity...if one deprives self of resistance; then others will show up for freebies.
Level with me aka choice (me) within (with) balance (level).
- Space/spatior - "to wander"
Each of ones steps within perceivable implies wandering; following suggestions permits another to wield a "wand" while casting spells...spells likes pluralism (we) and nihilism (never).
self immolated...Azzarello
Burned offering by AZZAREL/ISRAEL
Patsy to distract from Bernard Weinstein?
- Report...if one responds to a port; then ones vessel gets docked.
- Restore...if one responds to storage; then one holds onto.
Nature isn't for storage...it moves (inception towards death) each vessel (life). Mind/memory can be misused for storing suggested information by others; which is docked by ones consent.
a) Formative implies giving form; while forum implies jurisdiction over form. Flow (inception towards death) is the only jurisdiction over form (life).
b) Content implies holding together; while agenda/action implies setting apart into reactions. Few suggest content to tempt many to hold onto it; while ignoring that action (inception towards death) sets reactions (life) apart from one another.
c) Articles are scrubbed because natural (perceivable) scrubs artificial (suggested)...few mimic this by continuously destroying suggested information among consenting many.
d) Economic implies regulation of artifice aka ECO (habitation) LOGY (reason) NOMOS (managing)...logic/reason is hidden, because those managed with habitation are reasoning against one another.
lineage is in his blood
Lineage (inception towards death) moves through blood (life).
doesn't associate with the religion...actually hates them
Ones consent to suggested moralism implies religion and establishes a conflict of reason (love vs hate). Choosing to let go of hate and love breaks the bond of religion.
because their mother
Cause (motion) towards being (matter) goes through mother (momentum).
jew; jewish
Nature doesn't brand anything...those within suggest each other to hold onto brands aka idolatry as to manipulate each others behavior aka domestication.
Is there any saving this troubled man?
Order (inception towards death) doesn't save chaos (life)...it reveals it. Ignoring to discern this troubles ones mind.
Why The Lie?
Why implies energy...a moving source. Anyone within motion can be deceived to hold onto something (truth), which establishes a contradiction (lie). Those holding onto are trying to defeat the contradiction with what they're holding onto, and so many destroy each other mutually, while permitting few to utilize energy without interference.
- Kosher... Loose Change 9/11
- Treyf... 9/11 Missing Links
Theological Differences
Being implies different from one another...consenting to suggested theism (theo) and logism (logical) tempts many ones to respond alike.
They're saying it's fringe
Being implies center (perception) within circumference (perceivable)...consenting to anything suggested tempts one off-center, hence towards fringe/border/edge/margin etc.
Being within sound implies centered; consenting to what others are "saying" implies inclination towards "fringe".
emotional "energies" and "vibrations"
a) There's only one energy and it moves/motion...those within can choose to ignore being moved, which implies emotion/emotio/ emoveo - "to move from".
b) EN'ERGY, noun (Gr. work) - "internal or inherent power" implies internal generation of action (motion) and reactions (matter) in balance (momentum) with each other. Center of balance implies choice aka oscillation aka vibration.
Being implies choice within balance (need/want)...instead of oscillating between need (perceivable inspiration) and want (suggested information), many choose dullness for self and friction (want vs not want) against others.
how this holy water retains that holyness even if it just sits there
There implies a differentiation from here...and differentiation can only exist within motion. Holy/whole moves; while each partial within wields the free will of choice to ignore being (life) moved (inception towards death) by for example suggesting to each other that "it just sits there".
As for just..."JUST balances, just weights, a just ephah and a just hin shall ye have." ~Leviticus 19:36.
Balance can only exist within motion...it's the choice within motion that is free to choose to ignore that, hence imbalancing self, which others exploit by tricking ones choice to choose chosen ones suggestion.
holy water, it burns like acid
AC'ID, adjective (Latin acidus) - "edge"...as in knowledge aka all perceivable aka whole/holy for each divided/divine partial within.
The flow of perceivable inspiration, it burns suggested information like knowledge.
What about asking Abraham to sacrifice his son?
ABH (father) RAHAM (multitude)...animation sacrifices (sets apart) multitude.
Few suggested MANY to come together, as to trick each one to ignore that nature sets each one apart from one another.
God sacrificing his one and only son to atone
Aka whole (god) setting apart (sacrificing) each one (son) aka AT (direction towards) ONE...
let's pretend Satanist were doing ...what would one's reaction be?
a) Whole does; each partial within reacts to being (life) done (inception towards death). Reacting to the reactions of another tempts one to ignore being done.
b) A satan-ist is consenting to suggested satan-ism, while ignoring perceivable...satan/adverse/advertere - "turning towards".
part animal
Partials (life) animated (inception towards death) within whole implies SAC'RIFICE, verb - "to devote with loss" aka DEVOTE, verb - "to set apart".
pagan
Pagan/pangere/pag - "to fix; to fasten"...animation cannot be fixed/fastened by those within; trying it anyway hastens ones demise.
a) Bio (life) weapon (choice)
b) Suggestion implies ahead (towards outcome); perception implies astern (in response to origin).