1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

Druid/druwid aka deru (solid) weid (to see)...

The difference between seeing (perception) liquid (perceivable) and seeing (perception) solid (suggested) implies ones consent to hold onto solid, while ignoring liquid, hence the use of jack o'lanterns and hexes as solid idols to invoke liquid/lucid imagination.

2
free-will-of-choice 2 points ago +2 / -0

a) Parallel/parallēlos aka para (besides) allos (other) aka being (life) in-between sides (inception/death) among others.

b) Parallel as in "same plane but never meeting" contradicts intercourse among life.

c) As for "parallel to surface"... earth isn't surface, but interior aka in-between aka as above/so below.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

home of mind

Home implies "fixed residence; dwelling place; a settlement"...within a moving nature that implies a self imposed prison.

Fixed residence contradicts temporal resistance (life) during ongoing velocity (inception towards death).

on behalf...leave us alone

a) Behalf implies "being half", hence the division of ALL and ONE aka "alone"

b) US aka united states implies suggested pluralism tempting ones consent to join others. How could "us" ever be "alone"?

cyperspace

Aka cyber/cipher (zero) space/spatior (to wander)...there's your fucking prison with zero space to wander.

We have no elected government

Each one wields the ELECTING free will of choice, which by selecting permits others to control (govern) ones mind (ment) with suggested information.

the tyrannies you seek to impose on us

Entering the "cyberspace" implies ones free will of choice to seek entrance, hence putting self willingly EN TRANCE (into an insensible condition).

Seeking entrance into cyberspace implies the RESIDENT EVIL TYRANT within self giving chase, on behalf of an UMBRELLA CORPORATION.

2
free-will-of-choice 2 points ago +2 / -0

ALGO (rithmic) L(anguage) aka ALGOL aka al-ghul aka a ghoul/demon... https://www.etymonline.com/word/Algol#etymonline_v_8143

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

Decentralized is the only way

Center (life) of way (inception towards death)...solidification during liquidation implies centrifugation.

2
free-will-of-choice 2 points ago +2 / -0

din jabbar

"The Gom Jabbar test for humanity, which assesses a person's ability to endure pain and maintain self-awareness under extreme duress" ... so much for the DUNE coon angle.

shamsud

Aka "sun of islam" from islam/aslama - "resignation; surrender; submission" aka a setting sun.

2
free-will-of-choice 2 points ago +2 / -0

training replacement

Setting up a skeleton crew for a sinking ship (disney)...

break down in tears

Wait until the reality hits that he's bald...

2
free-will-of-choice 2 points ago +2 / -0

jew in charge...need electricity to control

a) Ones choice of consent charges a chosen ones suggestion.

b) Suggestion attracts (magnetic); consent elects (electric).

c) Electing (need) or selecting (want)...it's ones free will of choice.

fragile defeatable system

a) Being implies fragment (ones perception) within whole (all perceivable)...struggling to sustain self amidst attractions (suggestions) by others.

b) A fragment cannot defeat whole...trying to defeat other fragments only fragments further.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

if december is the 10th...

...then january (11th); february (12th); march (1st) aka vernal equinox aka spring.

how many months are there?

Month/menon - "moon"...how many moons are there?

2
free-will-of-choice 2 points ago +2 / -0

Happy

Happy/hap - "chance, fortune"...choice adapts to origin; chance seeks fortune towards outcome.

New

"The thing that hath been, it is that which shall be; and that which is done is that which shall be done: and there is no new thing under the sun." ~ ecclesiastes 1:9

  • September/septem/seven
  • October/octo/eight
  • November/novem/nine
  • December/deca/ten

Wed, 1 January 2025 = 1st of Tevet, 5785. Tevet (טֵבֵת) is the 10th month of the Hebrew year.

Year

Year/jaru/jaro - "spring"...

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

some shape or form that is provable by sense data

Sensing implies as form (life) shaping within flow (inception towards death)...collected data has to be artificially moved and exchanged among those who ignore their senses.

Everything is ultimately faith based

Before one can choose to have faith in anything...everything generates the balance for ones choice.

What generates balance and why would the choice within require faith to function?

Faith implies holding onto something...holding onto something during balance implies imbalance for ones choice.

you can gather knowledge

What if moving knowledge (perceivable inspiration) cannot be gathered/collected/held onto/faithfully preserved....only drawn from?

What if few trick many to gather/collect/hold onto/faithfully preserve suggested information (fiction), while ignoring perceivable inspiration (reality)?

How come many seem to lose "knowledge" to few over and over again? How often did the library of Alexandria burned down, and what does Amazon's "KINDLE FIRE" imply?

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's just another level of deception

From self onto others aka from deep state within self (ignorance) towards deep state among others (occult)...it's ones own ignorance which occults that which nature reveals, when consenting to the suggestions by others.

Level implies balance; being implies choice..."another" tempts one to ignore that.

God cannot be proven...

...because proof is in the pudding/putting aka CAUSE putting BEING into effect. One cannot proof to another that ALL (whole) causes ONE (partial)...only discern self within it.

It's seeking proofs through one another which takes origin out of the equation...

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

Seek God

a) Seeking implies striving towards outcome...God implies origin.

b) The suggestion: "Ask, and it shall be given you; seek, and ye shall find; knock, and it shall be opened unto you"...distracts one from all being given through an open foundation (perceivable) to each one (perception) within.

Whatever one asks; the solutions was already given. Whatever one seeks; everything was fully available. Wherever one knocks; was already open.

We are flipping an upside down world right side up

So then flip seeking into finding aka foundation of being. Few can only play hide and seek because many willingly ignore origin for seeking outcomes like peace; mastery; end game; love; protection; benefits; growth etc.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

staying in the workforce

From the moment of inception to the moment of death...the living heart works in response to the force of nature. It's the ignorant mind that can be tempted to join a "workforce", which establishes a conflict of reason...

  • Should I stay or should I go now
  • If I go there will be trouble
  • And if I stay it will be double

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8-cjjzNbg70

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

They inherited...

Inheritance in nature aka succession implies increase of child through decrease of adult. Few suggest tradable inheritance outside of self to tempt many to seek from another ones decrease , while ignoring to increase self.

to squeeze out

Nature impresses (inception towards death) expressions (life) within...ignoring this represses ones expression within self, while permitting others to suppress from outside.

Ones consent to hold onto a suggestion implies the squeeze upon self, while reasoning about suggested implies the squeezing of each other among many...for the benefit of few.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

complete lack of leadership

a) Followers complete a leader; lack/loss completes growth...following a leader prevents growth (life) within loss (inception towards death).

b) Before a ship can be led...it balances as solid (life) within fluid (inception towards death). Following another ship establishes an imbalance between giving way vs standing on.

Navigation itself is only an issue within an artificial waterway. Why? Because there's only one way (inception towards death) for each vessel (life) within nature.

No life is like: "Omg, I'm lost, where's death?"...

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

CIA

Each being implies center (perception) of agency (perceivable)...consenting to a suggestion by another implies intelligence/intelligo - "to understand" aka to stand under another, hence permitting another the center position above self.

documents reveal

A docked (docu) mind (ment) conceals itself from what nature reveals.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

The God of Things As They Ought to Be

a) Ought/ahte/agan - "to own; owe"...taking into possession represses the expressions of a being.

b) Thing/þing - "assembly"...God doesn't assemble beings; God (whole) separates each being (partial) from one another.

c) Ones consent to pluralism (things) selects the one suggesting it as "God of Things" aka as the assembling author.

billiken

a) BI (two) LIKE (same; equal; having the same form)

b) If one gives consent (want or not want) to a suggestion, then two sides (want vs not want) are being assembled together within a conflict of reason among consenting aka equalized ones.

Those who rub its belly will have good luck

Applying friction (to rub) to the belly/bhel (swelling) of a conflict gives good luck to the one outside of those lucked/locked in the bad conflict.

To buy a Billiken was said to give the purchaser luck, but to receive one as a gift would be better luck.

Buying a billiken implies investing into the shaping of a suggestion, which tempts others into a conflict of reason by selling themselves out.

Receiving a billiken implies others willingly entering into a conflict of reason already purchased...aka benefiting from generated interest/usury.

connection to jesuits

Each anointed one (Christ) is set apart from one another...consenting to suggested jesuism connects many together.

connection to freemasonry

A mason of free (will of choice) shapes suggestions to tempt the choice of others to bind self by consent to a conflict of reason, hence establishing a bi-like being out of each one differential.

new thought movement

New vs old implies circular movement of thought aka logic within self and reason against others.

Suggested NEW distracts one from perceivable NOW aka the momentum (inception towards death) of motion for each matter (life) within.

an idol created

Nature cannot create...all was before each one comes into being. Consenting to suggested creationism aka creatio ex nihilo ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creatio_ex_nihilo ) implies idolatry.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

a) Trust puts ones mind into rest aka "interest"...

b) Don't aka "doing nothing" isn't real...it's a suggested fiction tempting your consenting trust to hold onto it, hence putting your mind to rest.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

all these oligarchs...

Oligos (few) arkhia (to rule)...not all, but each one of few ruling many. How? By tempting each singular one among many to consent to suggested pluralism (these).

Neither God, nor nature implies plural...but one and only/oli aka singular.

the effort to convince

As effortless as using suggestion to tempt consent to convince itself to shirk response-ability onto another.

the surveillance state for intelligence

Intelligence/intelligo - "to understand"...if many "stand under"; then few simply have to hammer down anyone standing up. Wack a mole isn't that hard to watch over aka surveil.

both conservatives and leftists alike

Both conservatism vs liberalism and leftism vs rightism imply alike consent to mutual conflict in-between aka to a conflict of reason.

Before one can choose a side within such an imbalance...one is choice within balance.

they hold all the power

Nature cannot be held onto, since it moves velocity (inception towards death) through resistance (life). The power of few implies consenting many choosing to hold onto suggestions by few, hence collectivizing all ignored resistance of the unwashed masses into the hands of a persistently resisting few aka israel/yisra'el - "he that striveth with God".

until they can separate rhetoric from action

It's action (inception towards death) which separates into reactions (life)...few suggest rhetoric to tempt many to ignore that, while grinding against each other within conflicts of reason over suggested rhetoric.

Rhetoric/rhetorice/rhētorikē tekhnē aka "artificial oration"...an inversion of natural action, which doesn't orate words, but moves sound through each instrumental being.

2
free-will-of-choice 2 points ago +2 / -0

incredible what these companies are doing

Com (together) Pa (to feed)...it's the credit given by each of many, which permits few to feed upon many together.

Few suggest the creeds; each one of many gives credit to it, hence being able (ble) to credit (credi) within (in)...

3
free-will-of-choice 3 points ago +3 / -0

a) Call no other man father/pater/pate...

b) US aka United States contradicts patent/pete - "to spread". Uniting together prevents spreading apart.

c) Only all offers each one within "being"...licensing each other tempts one to ignore the sole/soul offer.

3
free-will-of-choice 3 points ago +3 / -0

From the moment of inception to the moment of death...the living heart is never at leisure. It's ones mind that can be licensed to leisure.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

things MOST PEOPLE consider obvious

Obvious implies "frequently met with"...nature doesn't frequent; it occasions/intermittents/scatters THINGS apart from one another, so that each can have intercourse with one another to regenerate off-spring.

truths around the lies

Truth vs lies implies the circular logic within self and the conflicts of reason against others.

To be (life) implies directed from (inception) to (death)...ignoring this by holding onto either truth of false shapes logic/reason around self.

fall for the whole

Being implies partial within whole aka rise (life) within fall (inception towards death).

fake things people believe in

Believing implies holding onto, hence faking reality, which cannot be held onto, since it moves.

Things cannot be fake...each thing chooses to fake when ignoring what's real.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›