Standing under contradicts being "free" will of choice.
kicked out of local
The local (position) of choice implies at the center of balance...others cannot kick one out of center; only tempt one into a conflict of reason by suggesting sides. If ones choice inclines towards any suggested side, then one imbalances self.
church
Church/kerke/keue - "to swell" implies each ones rise (life) during fall (inception towards death), hence church representing the "body of Christ".
enough is enough
Being implies one (partial) within all (whole)...whole offers partials always more than can be taken.
Ones struggle to sustain self is based on needing to resist wanted temptation, hence if one takes, then nothing will ever be enough, yet if ones resists to take, then one knows when enough was enough.
converse within the social confines
If ONE (singular) consents to suggested pluralism (con; soc);then one con-fines self to others.
Only within ALL (god) can ONE (christ) be free from one another...as long as one resists the temptations of others, which implies each ones free will of choice.
you are merely script NPCing this shit to others
a) A non-player cannot adapt by free will of choice to perceivable inspiration.
b) About free-will-of-choice: Post Score (0)...no scripture was offered by me toward others. Those who get offended chose to take an offer I didn't make.
Which makes you ignorant and irritating.
Nature irritates (inception towards death) reactions (life)...I simple make it harder for others to continue ignoring that.
Standing under contradicts being "free" will of choice.
The local (position) of choice implies at the center of balance...others cannot kick one out of center; only tempt one into a conflict of reason by suggesting sides. If ones choice inclines towards any suggested side, then one imbalances self.
Church/kerke/keue - "to swell" implies each ones rise (life) during fall (inception towards death), hence church representing the "body of Christ".
Being implies one (partial) within all (whole)...whole offers partials always more than can be taken.
Ones struggle to sustain self is based on needing to resist wanted temptation, hence if one takes, then nothing will ever be enough, yet if ones resists to take, then one knows when enough was enough.
If ONE (singular) consents to suggested pluralism (con; soc);then one con-fines self to others.
Only within ALL (god) can ONE (christ) be free from one another...as long as one resists the temptations of others, which implies each ones free will of choice.
a) A non-player cannot adapt by free will of choice to perceivable inspiration.
b) About free-will-of-choice: Post Score (0)...no scripture was offered by me toward others. Those who get offended chose to take an offer I didn't make.
Nature irritates (inception towards death) reactions (life)...I simple make it harder for others to continue ignoring that.