2
FetAnka 2 points ago +2 / -0

To do a successful assassination you gotta make it believable. You think people would just sit back and accept if AJ died, no matter how much of an accident it may have been? They've probably been considering it many times but aborted due to the risk of a major backlash.

He's banned everywhere and they try to waste his time with lawsuits and other legal fuckery. Assuming that someone is controlled opposition simply because they haven't been killed yet is just retarded. Then who could we possible trust anyway? Nobody, because everyone's controlled opposition right 🤡

by pkvi
2
FetAnka 2 points ago +2 / -0

Blockchains has the potential to replace every single big tech company and power everything from apps to websites, all by using the client machines instead of relying on massive data centers. It's a multi billion dollar industry and the only payment method that works is crypto because otherwise it wouldn't be a decentralized blockchain.

It's the precious metals of the digital world. It's also operating under the same principles, the supply if fixed, not just on this planet but for the whole universe. Although it's unlikely, there is always a small chance that a large lump of solid gold or silver falls down from the sky and land in your back yard.

by pkvi
1
FetAnka 1 point ago +1 / -0

Not to mention how much more vulnerable bank money is due to it's centralization. Power and internet connectivity aside it also relies on one single server, often multiple single servers with multiple parts involved, for instance, a bank, a card processor and some other middle men who all want their cut. Particularly during international trading.

Here in Sweden the largest grocery store chain with over 100 stores where forced to shut down for days, because of one server going down in Florida, that's a fucked up dependency right there. And it's not just the legacy banking system, their whole inventory tracking system relied on one company which relied on that one single server, so they couldn't even take cash.

Imagine instead with crypto, in a fully decentralized blockchain economy, where all systems are decentralized and platform independent, that chain would have had their own servers in their own stores, if power goes out, no problem, they just have a set of printed QR code which the customer could scan and send the payment too, then they register all the items manually as soon as the power comes back. Internet goes out? no problem, mesh networks, wifi, Bluetooth, 4G/5G and many other protocols solves that problem, especially when the servers are in house.

by pkvi
3
FetAnka 3 points ago +3 / -0

Devs are a diversity hire, anyone who knows programming in objective high level language would have used an array. That way, if more doses are needed only one number needs to be changed. This way it'll cost millions to upgrade, because muh government contractor who is just as incompetent, and the upgrade will break the application so that nobody could do anything.

2
FetAnka 2 points ago +2 / -0

The best asset to own is the one you don't have to trust, which you can also verify. You buy some land and it's obvious that this piece of land you bought is now your and you can do what you want with it. You buy a gun and you can test shooting at some stuff and verify how powerful it is. You buy food and you can taste it and make sure that it taste well and has the nutrients you need, and that it doesn't make you sick.

If you have use of gold during a SHTF situation, you may want to get some of that too, assuming that you can identify real gold to avoid getting scammed. If you have technical knowledge you could verify Bitcoin and other crypto too, it's all about verification, but no trust. Blind trust is how you get fucked over.

You'll be doing just fine in the new world order as a free human being.

2
FetAnka 2 points ago +2 / -0

The stock market is rigged as we saw with $GME, crypto markets are more like gold, real estate or used car market, only digital so that nobody is stupid enough to buy "paper crypto" which is just fractional reserve crypto.

Now imagine if the big banking cartel where to manipulate the market of used cars, fist they would have to buy up a shitload of used cars, mostly at terrible prices. Then to dump the price they would have to sell them all, at massive loss. And when they do, a lot of people are gonna take this opportunity to get a cheap used car which will go up in value once the market stabilizes.

Of course they could trick people into some sort of honey pot or trap door, but not like this. Why choose the most expensive way possible with huge risk of failure as they cannot control these sort of markets? It makes no sense at all.

1
FetAnka 1 point ago +1 / -0

Also sticking something that far up your noose will cause permanent brain damage either way.

1
FetAnka 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's possible to make crypto cash locally tho. Thing of it this way, in your small town you the people establish a bank, basically a warehouse where you can lockup assets. This time and unlike the globalists banks with full transparency. Then for every item deposited to this warehouse an entry of new value is added to the blockchain.

You then have a local WAN in the town, so when an item is deposited to blockchain you all receive this update in the next block, verify it and now has the latest updated wallet. Let's even make it so that the system updates once per day or week max. This means, you'll have the most recent version, even if you lose WAN connectivity for a few days.

Now why you you wanna do this then? Well because now you have a local currency, which you can print to slips of paper, and unlike regular cash you can verify that it actually has the value it claims to have by scanning it's QR code in case you don't trust the person trying to pay you. Best of all, this new local currency is also backed 1:1 by real physical gods. Also make sure to regularly audit the "bank" and switch the people responsible for it with votes on a regular basic, and ban loans.

Then if they at some point tries to steal from the warehouse hang them high in nearest light pole.

1
FetAnka 1 point ago +1 / -0

Crypto is the only asset that could bypass such restrictions tho. It's open source and platform independent by definition. So what if Apple and Goolag bans crypto wallets on their phones and prevent you from access crypto related websites. That doesn't mean you have to carry a whole desktop machine to the store, you can use a slip of paper with a QR code, just like cash but with in store verification or a plastic card with RFID chip.

Extending the crypto cash idea you could even have a central authority to verify the bills for you. It would ruin the point with crypto but then again, how's that worse than today's cash? It would be cash without inflation, and in most cases it would be possible to digitally verify the bills as soon as there's a machine with a local copy of the chain which is up to date.

1
FetAnka 1 point ago +1 / -0

They hijack everything centralized. Decentralized protocols are still protected by it's fundamentals. Take http for instance, the protocol for websites, we got our sites and leftists got their hijacked sites. Same with crypto, they're gonna build their carbon credit system as a smart contract on already established blockchains, that doesn't make the blockchain evil.

Tools are tools, Rothschild has most of the worlds gold in their vault, that doesn't make gold bad. Globalist tyrants are using guns to enforce tyranny, that doesn't make guns evil. Tools shall be used to prevent tyranny, and crypto is a great tool for black market trading in the new world order.

5
FetAnka 5 points ago +5 / -0

After Napoleon it should have been obvious that it's impossible to invade Russia from continental Europe, it's a massive open area with just forest and no signs of civilization, no resources. Armies waste their energy and supplies only to get killed once they actually reach the enemy.

The defender will always have the advantage. Just look at Finland who kept the red army out just by focusing on defense. Soviet had plans to invade Germany anyway so Hitler should have focused on defense rather than trying to conquer Russia, while also fighting most of Europe and the US.

Why were any jews and half jews in high ranking positions in the nazi military?

Why did so many high ranking nazi officers go to serve in the UN and NATO and NASA?

These are both great questions.

by pkvi
1
FetAnka 1 point ago +1 / -0

With corrupt government taking away your access to physical mediums of exchange they control, like cash while limiting your access to centralized digital currency (in your bank) because you don't bend over to leftist values. You should be happy that crypto exist and provides a digital decentralized alternative, with market value that both goes up and down instead of just down while the government steal your wealth through inflation.

The fact that miners can keep nuclear power plants alive is a very good thing. Otherwise you'll end up like the European continent, "but nuclear isn't needed, close it down REEE", only to realize few years later that you need a shitload of energy, at which point you'd already shut down all the nuclear power plants and realize you have to build new ones, which takes years. Meanwhile you'll pay insane amounts of money for your energy from the grid, possibly so much that it's more profitable to just have your own diesel generator.

1
FetAnka 1 point ago +1 / -0

Nature has a way to deal with parasites, once the temperature goes below -30C socialists will keep their hands inside of their own pockets and eventually starve to death. Authoritarian tyranny is harder to get rid of. Globalists holding a carrot on a stick has no power over people with a shed full of potatoes and carrots.

1
FetAnka 1 point ago +1 / -0

Scandinavian governments doesn't have that sort of authority. Every major city has no-go zones which is essentially lawless and the rural areas simply lacks law enforcement officers. Some counties only has two cops, it'll take them hours to drive from one side to the other.

You're misinterpreting the unwritten rules of society with "become ungovernable". Think of the consequences for each of your actions. You wanna shit in the sink or dump a tractor load of shit outside your municipality building? Go ahead, that's the way you become ungovernable in Scandinavia.

You don't drive on the left side of the road just because the government says you're supposed to be on the right side, just to prove that you're ungovernable. That way you'll just crash with someone else who just like you only wanna mind their own business without the government poking around.

The only way globalists could claim authority over Scandinavia would be through invasion from a foreign army, an army with at least 50 million people who know the landscape better than the millions of local hunters, which is impossible.

The only thing they could occupy is the bigger cities, which is useless anyway because they're full of libtard cucks who can't survive on their own.

2
FetAnka 2 points ago +2 / -0

Globalists never reward anyone and vaxx rates ain't higher there than anywhere else. None of these countries has mandates either as Nuremberg code is still taken seriously.

1
FetAnka 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's a known fact, you can do your own research in the archives of NY times and WSJ, assuming of course that MSM wasn't as fake back then as they are today, but it's the primary source of information that existed back then.

"Judea declares war on Germany" literal title for news articles back in 1933. The Jewish population in Europe started to boycott German products and did everything they could to hurt the German economy. Of course the people where probably more of useful idiots while the globalist banking cartel did most of the real damage.

1
FetAnka 1 point ago +1 / -0

Palestine existed unofficially, it's wasn't an "ethically clean" Jewish country/area but a lot of Jews did live there at the time so it makes sense to deport them to there.

Of course there's a globalist narrative that don't want you to know that, same narrative doesn't want you to know that Judea declared war on Germany long before WW2, the Jews in Germany where essentially enemies of the state, and prisoners of war.

2
FetAnka 2 points ago +2 / -0

Soviet always wanted a west coast in defense towards the US, and if it wasn't for the nazis rebuilding Germany and preparing it for war they might have actually succeeded. A weak Europe with minimal help from the US might not have been able to resist a Soviet invasion.

And if that would have happen, who knows, maybe they could have won the cold war as well. The German scientists did a lot for the US space program and the development of the nuclear bomb, if they worked for Soviet instead then perhaps Soviet could have conquered the world in just a few decades.

I think this is why the globalists really hates the Nazis, and always tries to associate patriots and nationalists with the nazis. They wanted Soviet to conquer the world. But the nazis fucked up their plans so they had to delay everything, rethink, do decades of preparation then release the plandemic in 2020 in a new attempt to conquer the world with global communism.

view more: ‹ Prev