I am curious what firepower did that. Artillery where? According to the narrative it was Russian retreat, recently, forces regrouping North, from the counter offensive. The counter offensive North East.
According to Russia it was a bridge they ambushed and blew up. Plenty of reports of this recently. They were regrouping behind their lines, and left a trap. It was in their artillery range.
Tell me what artillery by Ukraine, it's often static. It moves into ranges and fires. The drones Ukraine has can't do that too that many units. They have gotten better drones, but no, multiple drones. Or artillery. Or a few strikes by planes. Or larger payload missiles.
Okay the claim seems erratic.
Ukraine has left ambushes around Kiev early on and quite a few other places. But that seems like a bunch of nonsense off a recent counter offensive, supposedly the Russian retreat in the North East. What was used? Multiple drones, artillery trap where? In their fortified line around the contested Oblasts. Not what is claimed.
However there were repeated reports of Russia blowing up bridges, as they retreated in the North East. Also repeated reports of Ukraine trying to reclaim the Islands.
In any event, it's speculation. It hasn't done much else. Any war is still being fought.
It is possible Russia loiterred around a bridge, one wildebeest at a time. How to cross a river, defend the crossing, because it's obviously a crossing point. No surveillance of course. It has a squadron not covered by recon, because it's holding the bridge waiting for the herd. Patiently waiting for the crocodiles and lions. All the Wildebeests. Sshh be quiet and hide in the trees, making camp at the crossing, because y'all must cross one at a time. Possible of course. I mean then, it seems magical. How to hunt wildebeest.
That is Ukrainian losses according to Russia. It was an ambush on a bridge they blew.
The other picture is a failed beach-head of Snake Island by Ukrainian forces.
I don't really care what it is. Apart from there is no accurate reporting by Ukraine. Nothing has much accuracy by Ukraine.
When we aren't hearing the other side. Properly. There are only erratic claims. I don't care about any shit like this, until the war is won or lost.
Factually Ukraine are losing far more. What have they won. Nothing is that answer. Russia however are winning. No Ukrainian Coastline. Even if they don't take Odesa they hold the Islands. Kherson Oblast is faster a Russian protectorate. Gains in Luhansk and Donbass Oblasts.
Ukraine haven't won anything. They've only lost. Russia can lose whatever speculation, it doesn't detract from the facts they're gaining Ukrainian territories.
Do you trust them. More than this bullshit. Omg leaving it to that curriculum. But then as soon as its mandated school time what happens. Back to even worse bullshit. It's being criminalised not to send your kids into school at other ages, unless you follow study programs. They include.
Modern horrors. Like after that class what happens. Junior has all of sudden gone nuts. Literally talking about it incessantly. Possibly even worse much worse with that homework. The poor dog has become an experiment. God forbid.
Hang on was that America? Or Australia?
Australia there's different laws. They're insane.
But again. It shouldn't happen. It should be prosecuted on the same principle. It's a forced sex act on kids. It's not homework or a curriculum. Throw her jail for even suggesting it.
At what point does anybody, tell a kid to masturbate. Illegal. It's completely against the law. Kids can't. But girls could break their. Alerting them to their privates outside of descriptions has sexualized them. Why at that age? I don't understand why it's taught then outside of a word identifying their biology and possible reproduction. It has nothing to do with sex. Sex as children they have no understanding about. They simply don't need to. What benefit is there at 4 years old. Where their family came from. Simple description. Mommy and daddy or God forbid. Why details. How has it advanced them then. It hasn't. Later it's different. Not much not until perhaps 6 or 7. When they're actively learning more. Exposed to older children etc. But never to do sex acts. Criminal.
Abuse has simple profiling. Almost any teacher can spot it on younger children. Signs are as obvious as night and day. Older children less so, if they're being sexualized.
I don't want to read look or try to understand how it has broken the law. It has big time.
4 years old being sent home to masturbate is a forced sex act. Rape. Discussing sex with teachers is subjective to very strict laws. Where this topic has become so absurd the Supreme Court will step in sooner. Undoubtedly the national curriculum will change.
Instances like this will force the Scotus to rule. It has become insanity.
But that should be prosecuted to every length of the law. It's unbelievable abuse. The content is subjective, very dubious how it entered a cirriculum. It shouldn't at their age. There is simple profiling to watch for abuse. Almost any teacher can spot it at that age.
Send them straight to Congress. Obviously they're keen to represent somebody else.
Should be done in Europe. Send them straight to Brussels. Every boat. Send them on buses to Brussels. Such representation. Ukraine send it to Brussels. Any in the Thames, send them to Brussels. Obviously they're so keen.
It makes sense. All these other "citizens" first. Send them to where they care.
Ah look a down vote. It's common sense. If somebody makes absurd laws for somebody else not respresenting the population voting. What do you do. At what point, has the population voted for it? In fact at every opportunity they have emphatically despite propaganda and suppression voted away from it. Even legal immigrants would vote away from it, many would. Nobody wants it, apart from somebody else dictating other laws. Put it to vote. It would never pass, by any citizen majority. Not today. Please make it a referendum. Illegal immigration, and enforced immigration, gonna war to take their refugees, pay to war and take refugee. It would be overwhelmingly rejected.
So tell me what makes sense. Send them to where they care about it. Turn the WH into an asylum center. Turn Brussels into immigrant housing. Why not? Seriously has any citizen voted for it? Put it to referendum.
That's sick. Real sick. It's sexual assault, and rape.
I hope and pray every single teacher there goes to jail.
Think. That's rape. It's forcing children into sex acts. Illegal no matter that small print. Throw them in jail.
Possibly. The Software. The AI recognition systems. Hooking into various mainframes, via which satellites and coms.
What stake, which patients and shareholders for longer.
Or you tell me. They're macevillian. There's a hidden evil behind them that the public haven't even begun to catch on. It's their direct tracking. Not to mention the cost. It will just keep inflating. Like your train tickets. Undoubtedly much worse. Force demand for profit. Everytime a new powerstation needs to be put in, does energy increase or decrease in cost look at it. More cars more costs. Ching ching how easy is that, easier than oil. Parts break much quicker. Win win win. Not you, you get to pay for them because of the "Weather" they break in.
The church of batshit crazy. Batman the Redeemer.
All new tech has done is suppress them. Empowering tyrants. But they're being cheerled by the intelligence agencies and the media, backed by corps. Many of the same corps they're attacking. Until they were that dumb anyway. They actually larped on it. They genuinely thought they aren't enriching somebody else into greater profit and with it tighter control. But the weather they cry.
It's not his fault either and he's an easier tool to use.
As for this topic if you pay me more I'll build it. Hahaha. What a joke. I am sure there's some other expertise? Can't think of it.
Underground hyperloop. They had this system already. Not for humans, but the mail shoots? Remember those cartridges that shot all over cities with mail and cash in? What went wrong. The creditcard. But would you trust a human in it. Nope. That cost today would be insane. But probably better than drone delivery.
Underground expressway they have them already in places. But that access is quite restricted. It would be in his vision, it would be hugely expensive and exclusive.
Accurate to the point of 5G becoming real time. Where simply moving from one grid to the next has triangulated you, your device has been identified in it. Who has that data becomes the question, what does it take to acquire it. Harder where there isn't coverage, the lag, until they're fitting it everywhere, or trying too. Wait for the EVs. But the grid can pinpoint your location, moving from one to the next. You're a beacon through most devices, and depending on what they're using, has full building layouts, upto the point of optics.
They had a point. A real point. In fact if we go back to a turn of century. Children books and fairytales were quite dark. Aesop fables etc, but it's only because you have gained far more knowledge that you are pragmatic.
There's evil in the World.
Disney isn't to blame for this. It's more to blame for its modern bullshit. I don't what it is, except I have found it really hard watching anything today. It is utterly annoying all of it. So horribly annoying, can't watch 5 minutes of it. Haven't seen anything this year that makes me think it competes with previous. So utterly dreadful. Vomit inducing. Literally. Bring a barf bag. Walk out. Rewind films when they were fun instead of toxic. Try to watch a series where actors at least pretended to be their parts.
The productions today stink. Completely stink. Hopefully I find The Northman entertaining later. No expectations. Another one from this decade. They've nose dived. Edit: The Northman is actually quite good.
But I don't find Disney much to blame for it. Rather the repugnant programming. It's awful beyond all imagination.
Name one film this year, name one series. Don't. Utter shite.
Topically those old tales going back centuries aren't that cause. It's the people turning them into something else.
Did the Potus just air that bullshit? You can tell where he got his funding from. Where he still expects it.
1 million isn't even a percentage. There are in fact no empty chairs. That's the irony. Sure it sounds bad. Let's do Cancer shall we. Air that daily death rate. Please invent a vaccine for it. Not one that causes it.
Every climate activist is silent on this. No surprise.
What will it do to the environment. For a start the herds of Reindeer travelling the open border are going to be hugely affected by this. As well as other wildlife agreements in place from prior neutral status. The border will likely get fortified.
Any Nato bases will be cutting directly into the Arctic and Europe's largest remaining forest. It cut the rest down apart from the Carpathians now under bigger Nato expansion. Right into the Arctic. Any bases will see increasing build up, infrastructure, roads, airports, docks, and service factilies. Shipping lanes full of ships and subs now increasing their patrolling cutting into the thinning sheet ice.
Laughably not a word from the activists, people who supposedly cared. Because they only care about bullshit tech.
Russia's bases there have had a huge environmental toll. The Arctic tundra has warmed up. Until Wildfires are blazing across Siberia. The Arctic tundra releasing methane. Sweden and Finland that land is quite pristine. It will see increasing infrastructure, and build up. Forget the other threats.
Who cares, it really doesn't.
Is it even a percentage?
Let's get technical. What's the population 326,000? Plus another 20 million undocumented. A million is not even a percentage? Not compared to any other death. Fear porn probably kills more people. The rest of the population.
Haha. They won't. Sure there are always the emos. There's always a blackmarket. And the chaingangs. For more ghetto bullshit.
But no. You're focused on the what if, and any negatives. Instead of the positives.
At this point, who knows, what it exactly means. But it means something. It's probably just State Laws. A restriction. Not the prohibition. It was factually nothing you couldn't do. You had the power not to get pregnant. Simple education. Or contraception. You had that choice. Also for life. Why are you caught up by it being wrong. Because there are accidents or your mistakes? Now think. But there's always another State for different choices.
It often has another agenda besides the whole hoohaw. It was always controversy. Today why. Why right now, in the midst of it. Hmm, things that go bump.
Well, it's escalating. With it bigger risks. Not just to Ukraine, or Russia.. But how far does this go. It hasn't stopped this last decade, sped right up now. At the rates of today. It just gets worse. Tell me exactly what worse means?
I can link people intentionally, miscarrying, recklessly taking shit, or no care, plane flights, working like mules. I can link accidents. I can link crime like assault, robbery, panic. I can link bad health conditions, for your hairdo.
But they can happen outside of this, freakishly, and even naturally.
But they don't outside of extremes, not in huge statistics.
No miscarriages are traumatic. My sister didn't you read that.
You called it an abortion. I have given explanations, prior and then again, why there are differences. Fundamental differences. Not to be associated. Not even clinically.
First paragraph perhaps it will take a judge.
It went through. Now it rules exactly what it means.
Majority of the Globe is in extreme poverty, without health care, effectively they're decades behind.
Nations with health care, no, it shouldn't be happening, in such huge statistics, because there should be better planning and support. Pro life helps this. Abortion creates those statistics. An excuse for it. I didn't read it through. It's probably unaccurate, fear, used to provoked. But it's not to say with rapid immigration increases, it also occurs.
However, lifestyle also affects those miscarriage rates.
Nobody I know except my mum in the 80s, twice, and one of my sisters miscarried. Other sisters no not once. Friends no. My sister was devastated she had to make an absurd choice. She has had 5 children, had a procedure tubes tied, or something like this, for no more kids, but freakishly got pregnant. It would've killed her, and the baby wouldn't have developed properly either. It was dangerous, really dangerous. But at the time it broke her heart she had something like that. It ate at her for awhile. She got through it. We convinced her it was a miscarriage, it isn't an abortion. It wasn't right. Literally too small to incubate, just developing, couldn't grow it where it was, something with her tubes being previously operated on, and it stuck in the wrong place, but somehow pregnant, despite her former procedure. She was in terrible pain from it, physically and mentally, and it would've killed her. Hospital had made the choice. Miscarriage. She's caught on the sin stuff, chance stuff, life. She's a nurse.
Yea 4 sisters with kids, one miscarriage, 12 kids between them. I can run that with other people I know, and no, never this other huge statistic.
Above isn't an abortion, it's a miscarriage. That procedure is called something else. The odds were so absurd, there's no way in hell. She would've, imagine that. No it's a miscarriage. You had no choice.
But yea pointless debate anyway. Leave it to the judge to call it. Properly. Education. Think there's far to many fear stories. They've been used like my example to call it wrong.
No, most pregnancies are not miscarried. That's statistically wrong. Lifestyle plays a much bigger part. Pregnancy however generally births today. We aren't a century ago. It takes planning and care.
Abortion implies termination, dictionary. Abort means terminate. Further descriptions have been added to the medical procedure, largely because of its legal meanings. As explained. Until that ruling is overturned, any procedure remains worded into abortion's current description. It has included it for miscarriages because of the health aspects, and the support, care, counselling, etc. And for medical insurance. Obviously an angle to sell abortions.
But a miscarriage, isn't an abortion, because dead babies naturally don't stay inside of you. But they often need support and treatment to help get them out, because it's traumatic and can be unsanitary.
Understand?
I am sure there are ways previous comment, to cause a miscarriage. Legally it could count as an abortion, if abortion is criminalised. Then any terminology of medical procedure to extract miscarriages could change. Outside of criminalising abortion. How did your miscarriage occur. Accidentally, deliberately, criminally. They don't at 50%. The purpose of overturning abortion would be to birth, not terminate.
Yawn, evolution must mean the devolution of an invasive species not suited to its natural habitat. Correct me, if that isn't a fair assessment. The only thing humans cause is extinction. They significantly change natural ecosystems until there is no balance. They are invasively unrivaled until nature responds. Every other species they claim to have evolved from lives in harmony with its environment on simple checks and balances having specific roles. If something else invades that habitat, or their numbers don't match simple survival equations, an ecosystem keeping them in check by their dedicated species role's, all are calculated, extinction is caused. Humans have massively upset this, therefore they cannot have evolved and specifically only devolve. Maybe one day they might stop being apes. But it seems no matter what they do they're absolutely invasive to this Planet. It was suited to their demands and not evolutionary towards it.